kenievans wrote:
I like them both. Really nice job.
Thanks, Keni. I truly appreciate your comment.
Bmac wrote:
Hi. I prefer the first one, although both are quite beautiful. The first has superior composition with foreground, interesting subject, and background of a brilliant sky and clouds. The reflection is icing on the photo cake. I enjoy the focus, exposure and the overall feeling I get while viewing the image. Well done.
Thanks, Bmac. The reeds do add foreground. But they do block the view a bit. The reflections at this point in the river are nearly always calm. I think the river gets deeper there, as it is just above the dam. I do truly appreciate an emotional reaction to the scene. It's what I get every time I stand there. I'm pleased that it comes across.
rmalarz wrote:
Kathy, these are lovely. I agree with the comment about the foreground grass. That could be dealt with through the use of color or luminosity masks. Otherwise, the lighting and you way you handled it is quite nice.
--Bob
I'll look into how to do that. I've never been successful with masks. Thanks for the tip.
jaymatt wrote:
Both are nice, but I prefer the first one with the grass as a base.
Thanks, Greg. The first one is from a place where "someone" trims the reeds from time to time. I don't know who does it or why - maybe another photographer? So that's where I normally shoot. But the small invitation of the narrower opening was too good to pass up.
jaymatt wrote:
Both are nice, but I prefer the first one with the grass as a base.
Thanks, Jay. The jury seems to be mixed on that subject. I don't normally use the reeds in my images - in fact, I normally try to avoid them altogether. But on this day, in this place, they seemed an appropriate part of the scene.
yssirk123 wrote:
Both are beautiful images Kathy, but I like the richer colors in the first one. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks. The mountain changes from really dark when in shadow to really bright when in full sun. I find that my own mood affects which I like at a given time.
These are both beautiful. I love the perspective in the first shot, reeds and all. I love the angel wings in the second. Have you thought about a composite?
AzPicLady wrote:
Here are a couple more of Red Mountain that I took on Christmas Day. The clouds were playful, so we went from "severe clear" to totally clouded and back again several times. One cloud looked very much like an angel!
I'm looking for any suggestions you might have to make either of these better. I have to tell you up front that I really like both of these.
There are some dust spots on my sensor, apparently. I'm cleaning them up on the TIFF's as they get printed or uploaded to my website. So know that I'm aware of them.
These have basic processing: From RAW, contrast adjustment, clarity, vibrance. straightened.
Here are a couple more of Red Mountain that I took... (
show quote)
The two images tell very different stories.
The first is closer in and involves more of the foreground. It seems to be about the environment of the viewer looking at the mountain (hill.) This story is ephemeral. The reeds will change, the water level will change. The hill is the constant in a changing environment.
The second is more about the hill and how it fits in its environment of the sky and the mountain in the distance. While the sky will change the mountain in the background will be around longer so the story reaches back in time. This story seem more about permanence.
For me the story about the viewer is not nearly as compelling as the story about the hill.
But that is just me. I do like both however.
Anvil wrote:
These are both beautiful. I love the perspective in the first shot, reeds and all. I love the angel wings in the second. Have you thought about a composite?
I'm sure that could be done. I don't do them, though. But thanks for the suggestion. What elements of each would you keep?
dsmeltz wrote:
The two images tell very different stories.
The first is closer in and involves more of the foreground. It seems to be about the environment of the viewer looking at the mountain (hill.) This story is ephemeral. The reeds will change, the water level will change. The hill is the constant in a changing environment.
The second is more about the hill and how it fits in its environment of the sky and the mountain in the distance. While the sky will change the mountain in the background will be around longer so the story reaches back in time. This story seem more about permanence.
For me the story about the viewer is not nearly as compelling as the story about the hill.
But that is just me. I do like both however.
The two images tell very different stories. br ... (
show quote)
Actually, these were exactly some of my thoughts as I took these pictures and then studied them later for processing! You stated it much better than I could. THANK YOU. It is all about the mountain.
Mountains and hills almost always look better if their peaks are well lit. You may be able to do that by making selections, or alternatively I see that the darker bits are also red, so you may be able to lighten the top of the hill by lightening red in the HSL section.
AzPicLady wrote:
Here are a couple more of Red Mountain that I took on Christmas Day. The clouds were playful, so we went from "severe clear" to totally clouded and back again several times. One cloud looked very much like an angel!
I'm looking for any suggestions you might have to make either of these better. I have to tell you up front that I really like both of these.
There are some dust spots on my sensor, apparently. I'm cleaning them up on the TIFF's as they get printed or uploaded to my website. So know that I'm aware of them.
These have basic processing: From RAW, contrast adjustment, clarity, vibrance. straightened.
Here are a couple more of Red Mountain that I took... (
show quote)
Very nice. I like them both. By the way, I think R.G. is right about lightening up the peaks in the first image. I did a quick two minute mask/luminosity layer operation on the image and it improved it a lot, in my opinion.
Mike
dsmeltz wrote:
The two images tell very different stories.
The first is closer in and involves more of the foreground. It seems to be about the environment of the viewer looking at the mountain (hill.) This story is ephemeral. The reeds will change, the water level will change. The hill is the constant in a changing environment.
The second is more about the hill and how it fits in its environment of the sky and the mountain in the distance. While the sky will change the mountain in the background will be around longer so the story reaches back in time. This story seem more about permanence.
For me the story about the viewer is not nearly as compelling as the story about the hill.
But that is just me. I do like both however.
The two images tell very different stories. br ... (
show quote)
Poetic, eloquent, wonderful commentary!
R.G. wrote:
Mountains and hills almost always look better if their peaks are well lit. You may be able to do that by making selections, or alternatively I see that the darker bits are also red, so you may be able to lighten the top of the hill by lightening red in the HSL section.
I've looked at lightening the top. A cloud was moving in and caught the top of it just as i got into position. I'll try dodging that a bit. Thanks.
Blenheim Orange wrote:
Very nice. I like them both. By the way, I think R.G. is right about lightening up the peaks in the first image. I did a quick two minute mask/luminosity layer operation on the image and it improved it a lot, in my opinion.
Mike
Thanks, Mike. I'll see what I can do.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.