The left’s religion.
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
jcboy3 wrote:
There is no god.
Based upon what?
Are you one who believes that the Big Bang set everything in the universe in motion and that everything since is a direct result?
LWW wrote:
Based upon what?
Are you one who believes that the Big Bang set everything in the universe in motion and that everything since is a direct result?
One can accept the possibility of something one might consider a god and still find the idea of the god of the bible to be absurd. At the same time, if you have a religious belief, and it helps you through life without impacting others, I wouldn’t attempt to talk you out of it.
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
thom w wrote:
One can accept the possibility of something one might consider a god and still find the idea of the god of the bible to be absurd. At the same time, if you have a religious belief, and it helps you through life without impacting others, I wouldn’t attempt to talk you out of it.
A typical non answer to a question not directed towards you.
If you insist on butting in would you try answering what was asked.
jcboy3 wrote:
Whips and chains and guns and h*****g ropes are what kept s***es in place.
Grow up little boy, you are referring back to the time when lib f*****t socialist dems ens***ed b****s. Today lib f*****t socialist dems ens***e the poor by keeping them on the dole. Keep the pittance flowing to them and you have their v**e. This is no surprise to anyone.
jcboy3 wrote:
There is no god. You just made that up.
No wonder you act the way you do. Your statement explains a lot.
thom w wrote:
One can accept the possibility of something one might consider a god and still find the idea of the god of the bible to be absurd. At the same time, if you have a religious belief, and it helps you through life without impacting others, I wouldn’t attempt to talk you out of it.
So, are you lonely or what? Your point of posting this drivel was......what????
Elaine2025 wrote:
Grow up little boy, you are referring back to the time when lib f*****t socialist dems ens***ed b****s. Today lib f*****t socialist dems ens***e the poor by keeping them on the dole. Keep the pittance flowing to them and you have their v**e. This is no surprise to anyone.
Awhile back you falsely chastised me for name calling. Which is untrue, since I have seldom, if ever, resorted to name calling. Once I told a story about spreading manure. You said I just insulted 40 million people that v**ed for Trump, ( the 43 million who v**ed for Hillary probably did like it). Now, I see you using the terms, "lib f*****t socialist dems" and "little boy" constantly. The demeaning name calling you do is pure hypocrisy. Not pretty.
If democrats are enslaving b****s by keeping them in poverty, please explain how they are doing this and also, since Republicans have been in control of Congress and/or the White House for years and in control of both for the past two years, what have they done to change this perceived situation? All I've seen is efforts to make it more difficult for them to v**e, gerrymandering to negate their v**e, make it more difficult for them to get health insurance and efforts to reduce their financial safety net. Please state what Republicans have done for b****s when they were in control.
thom w wrote:
One can accept the possibility of something one might consider a god and still find the idea of the god of the bible to be absurd. At the same time, if you have a religious belief, and it helps you through life without impacting others, I wouldn’t attempt to talk you out of it.
I think that was well put.
Since ancient time people have always believed in God or Gods. There are so many variations of religious belief that it is pointless to argue that one particular religious belief is the right one. If your belief system works for you great. Personally I believe in the big bang and a god. It works for me and that's all that matters. I don't think they are mutually exclusive.
Frosty wrote:
Awhile back you falsely chastised me for name calling. Which is untrue, since I have seldom, if ever, resorted to name calling. Once I told a story about spreading manure. You said I just insulted 40 million people that v**ed for Trump, ( the 43 million who v**ed for Hillary probably did like it). Now, I see you using the terms, "lib f*****t socialist dems" and "little boy" constantly. The demeaning name calling you do is pure hypocrisy. Not pretty.
If democrats are enslaving b****s by keeping them in poverty, please explain how they are doing this and also, since Republicans have been in control of Congress and/or the White House for years and in control of both for the past two years, what have they done to change this perceived situation? All I've seen is efforts to make it more difficult for them to v**e, gerrymandering to negate their v**e, make it more difficult for them to get health insurance and efforts to reduce their financial safety net. Please state what Republicans have done for b****s when they were in control.
Awhile back you falsely chastised me for name call... (
show quote)
Get over yourself Frosty. Little tomme, tard and jcboy act like preschoolers so I refer to them that way. It is mine as well as many others that the dems are lib f*****t and socialist. That is not "name calling" they even describe themselves as socialists. Ocasio Cortez, the the lib f*****t socialist dems little darling is an admitted socialist. She is an i***t, but she is one of yours. There is the party of the democrat socialists in government and Democratic Socialists of America. Conservatives are not socialists.
So, your opinion is that if one has to have ID to v**e, that is JUST TOO DIFFICULT? I guess you view minorities as too stupid or lazy to get ID? You have to have ID to buy alcohol, cigarettes, a bank account, food stamps, welfare, social security, medicaid, unemployment, getting a job, pay rent or buy a house, drive, buy or rent a car, fly, get married, purchase a gun, rent a hotel room, adopt a pet, get a hunting or fishing license, buy a cell phone, visit a casino, and even buying certain cold medications, but you think it is unfair to ask a potential v**er to supply ID? What is wrong with you?
Frosty, you see what you want to see and what fits your narrative. You have heard it all explained before how the lib f*****t socialist dems ens***e the poor, obviously you choose not to believe that. Me repeating it one more time will not change your opinion
http://www.youtube.com/embed/Wx1Kb51kOBQ Another poster posted this. Watch if you want. It lays it out pretty clearly.
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
Frosty wrote:
I think that was well put.
Since ancient time people have always believed in God or Gods. There are so many variations of religious belief that it is pointless to argue that one particular religious belief is the right one. If your belief system works for you great. Personally I believe in the big bang and a god. It works for me and that's all that matters. I don't think they are mutually exclusive.
Thanks for adding a reasonable reply, still waiting for JC and Tommy.
Elaine2025 wrote:
Get over yourself Frosty. Little tomme, tard and jcboy act like preschoolers so I refer to them that way. It is mine as well as many others that the dems are lib f*****t and socialist. That is not "name calling" they even describe themselves as socialists. Ocasio Cortez, the the lib f*****t socialist dems little darling is an admitted socialist. She is an i***t, but she is one of yours. There is the party of the democrat socialists in government and Democratic Socialists of America. Conservatives are not socialists.
So, your opinion is that if one has to have ID to v**e, that is JUST TOO DIFFICULT? I guess you view minorities as too stupid or lazy to get ID? You have to have ID to buy alcohol, cigarettes, a bank account, food stamps, welfare, social security, medicaid, unemployment, getting a job, pay rent or buy a house, drive, buy or rent a car, fly, get married, purchase a gun, rent a hotel room, adopt a pet, get a hunting or fishing license, buy a cell phone, visit a casino, and even buying certain cold medications, but you think it is unfair to ask a potential v**er to supply ID? What is wrong with you?
Frosty, you see what you want to see and what fits your narrative. You have heard it all explained before how the lib f*****t socialist dems ens***e the poor, obviously you choose not to believe that. Me repeating it one more time will not change your opinion
http://www.youtube.com/embed/Wx1Kb51kOBQ Another poster posted this. Watch if you want. It lays it out pretty clearly.
Get over yourself Frosty. Little tomme, tard and j... (
show quote)
You live in the world you created for yourself. Thankfully I don't have to live in this fantasy world and get to live in the world of reality.
I knew you couldn't answer the question about what have the Republicans done for the many black people living in or near poverty. Since Republicans have had control of both Congress and the White House they could have done something. They did nothing. Instead of answering all the questions, you focused on ID's. What about the gerrymandering and the lack of polling places and the lack of b****ts and the long lines at the few polling places? All done to negate b****s and other groups v**es or to discourage them from v****g at all. I bet you didn't forget about those questions? You just can't answer them without acknowledging the t***h as it exists in the real world.
I don't believe you even know what a socialist or f*****t is. To you they are just insults to everyone who isn't an extreme right wing fanatic.
Chile was run by a rightwinger, Augusto Pinochet. Read about how that went.
LWW wrote:
Based upon what?
Are you one who believes that the Big Bang set everything in the universe in motion and that everything since is a direct result?
Based upon two things: (1) there is no evidence, and (2) the propensity of people to make up supreme beings of all sorts.
And yes, there is substantial evidence for the Big Bang.
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
jcboy3 wrote:
Based upon two things: (1) there is no evidence, and (2) the propensity of people to make up supreme beings of all sorts.
And yes, there is substantial evidence for the Big Bang.
You didn’t answer my question, and yes I believe in the BBT.
This was my question:
“Are you one who believes that the Big Bang set everything in the universe in motion and that everything since is a direct result?”
Please try again.
LWW wrote:
You didn’t answer my question, and yes I believe in the BBT.
This was my question:
“Are you one who believes that the Big Bang set everything in the universe in motion and that everything since is a direct result?”
Please try again.
LWW: "Based upon what?"
I answered that question.
As for the second; Causality is questionable, so it depends on what you define to be the "Big Bang".
But if you think that a god had some hand in some of the early universe; there is no evidence and no possibility of any evidence for that. And it's a stretch to attribute the extremely localized developments on this planet, billions of years later, with that god. The human mind can't comprehend the vastness and time scale of the Universe, and until recently didn't even have an inkling of it. So people make up their gods to put meaning in there life and provide easy answers. And that puts obstacles in the way of knowledge.
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
jcboy3 wrote:
LWW: "Based upon what?"
I answered that question.
As for the second; Causality is questionable, so it depends on what you define to be the "Big Bang".
But if you think that a god had some hand in some of the early universe; there is no evidence and no possibility of any evidence for that. And it's a stretch to attribute the extremely localized developments on this planet, billions of years later, with that god. The human mind can't comprehend the vastness and time scale of the Universe, and until recently didn't even have an inkling of it. So people make up their gods to put meaning in there life and provide easy answers. And that puts obstacles in the way of knowledge.
LWW: "Based upon what?" br br I answere... (
show quote)
The BBT is generally defined as the moment the universe sprang into existence ... if you believe in the BBT you surely believe that.
Now, let me ask a third time:
“Are you one who believes that the Big Bang set everything in the universe in motion and that everything since is a direct result?”
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.