Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Manfrotto, Tamrac, or Lowepro backpack/shoulder bags: which is best?
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Nov 27, 2018 09:11:40   #
bobmcculloch Loc: NYC, NY
 
Naptown Gaijin wrote:
Interested in hearing opinions from people who HAVE EXPERIENCE with at least 2 of these 3 brands and can make a valid comparison. Obviously, if you have used only one, then you can't compare from personal experience.

I have a Panasonic Lumix GC-9 with the following lenses: 100-300mm f4-5.6, 12-35mm f2.8, 42.5mm f1.2, 60mm f2.8 Macro; a Godox ving flash; 5-6 filters, and assorted extra batteries, lens cloth, etc., and sometimes carrying a tripod.

Leaning towards cloth vs leather and prefer lightweight. Prefer something that doesn't scream "PHOTOGRAPHER !!!".

At age 70, I'm NOT going trekking or hiking..... hell, I'm not even walking far.

Prefer something that gives me quick access to my camera in case I spot something fleeting. (Isn't that an interesting word?) So, kinda think buckles that are hard to open or sticking zippers is too much of a pain to deal with.


ices change and are not really important to me. QUALITY and ease of use, and comfort is important.

I will not be expanding beyond the above, and not getting a FF Canon or Nikon in the future, so don't need something overly large to "grow into".

Greatly appreciate in advance your thoughtful consideration and recommendations.
Interested in hearing opinions from people who HAV... (show quote)


The three brands you mention scream camera or other expensive item, based on what you set out as needs I'd go with a generic messenger bag,and possibly an insert to hold the camera gear, I do without the insert as much of my equipment has foam cases on it , Bob.

Reply
Nov 27, 2018 09:34:44   #
pappleg
 
Naptown Gaijin wrote:
Interested in hearing opinions from people who HAVE EXPERIENCE with at least 2 of these 3 brands and can make a valid comparison. Obviously, if you have used only one, then you can't compare from personal experience.

I have a Panasonic Lumix GC-9 with the following lenses: 100-300mm f4-5.6, 12-35mm f2.8, 42.5mm f1.2, 60mm f2.8 Macro; a Godox ving flash; 5-6 filters, and assorted extra batteries, lens cloth, etc., and sometimes carrying a tripod.

Leaning towards cloth vs leather and prefer lightweight. Prefer something that doesn't scream "PHOTOGRAPHER !!!".

At age 70, I'm NOT going trekking or hiking..... hell, I'm not even walking far.

Prefer something that gives me quick access to my camera in case I spot something fleeting. (Isn't that an interesting word?) So, kinda think buckles that are hard to open or sticking zippers is too much of a pain to deal with.

If quick access is your primary goal you may want to rethink a shoulder bag or backpack. i would not describe either as particularly fast. Think Tank makes a belt/shoulder strap system where all your gear can go into fast access pouches that slide on a belt and sized for bodies and lenses of various sizes. No cheap but well made and easily quickest access to your gear. Pat


Prices change and are not really important to me. QUALITY and ease of use, and comfort is important.

I will not be expanding beyond the above, and not getting a FF Canon or Nikon in the future, so don't need something overly large to "grow into".

Greatly appreciate in advance your thoughtful consideration and recommendations.
Interested in hearing opinions from people who HAV... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 27, 2018 09:47:56   #
Old44
 
Think Tank holster bags.

Reply
 
 
Nov 27, 2018 10:51:45   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
I've never owned a Manfrotto bag but I have several Tamrac and Lowepro bags. They are both quality bags. They both use fine zippers and are of good materials and of good construction. You can't go wrong with either brand. So the only thing you need to consider is how they look, and if they will accommodate all your equipment. I want to warn you that if you put all your equipment in one bag, it's going to be very heavy. 1 camera, 4 lenses, 1 flash and stuff like batteries, filters, lens cleaning stuff, memory cards, and other stuff you might put in there all weighs it down. I'm 63 and when I put this much gear in my Tamrac bag I can barely lift it. So honestly, I do have one large Tamrac bag that I can store most of my gear in and if I need to take all of it with me I can take it out and put it in my cars trunk. But I have some smaller bags that I can load differently so that I only take 1 or 2 lenses, 1 camera, 1 flash etc. so that I can carry with me just what I need for a certain shoot.

So most of the time I store the bulk of my equipment in 2 bags. One large, and one small to medium sized bag. I simply move my equipment from one to the other depending on what I might need for the days shoot.

Naptown Gaijin wrote:
Interested in hearing opinions from people who HAVE EXPERIENCE with at least 2 of these 3 brands and can make a valid comparison. Obviously, if you have used only one, then you can't compare from personal experience.

I have a Panasonic Lumix GC-9 with the following lenses: 100-300mm f4-5.6, 12-35mm f2.8, 42.5mm f1.2, 60mm f2.8 Macro; a Godox ving flash; 5-6 filters, and assorted extra batteries, lens cloth, etc., and sometimes carrying a tripod.

Leaning towards cloth vs leather and prefer lightweight. Prefer something that doesn't scream "PHOTOGRAPHER !!!".

At age 70, I'm NOT going trekking or hiking..... hell, I'm not even walking far.

Prefer something that gives me quick access to my camera in case I spot something fleeting. (Isn't that an interesting word?) So, kinda think buckles that are hard to open or sticking zippers is too much of a pain to deal with.

Prices change and are not really important to me. QUALITY and ease of use, and comfort is important.

I will not be expanding beyond the above, and not getting a FF Canon or Nikon in the future, so don't need something overly large to "grow into".

Greatly appreciate in advance your thoughtful consideration and recommendations.
Interested in hearing opinions from people who HAV... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 27, 2018 11:00:04   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
The smallest bag that will hold the most stuff.

Years ago I bought a bag at the same time that I bought my Nikon 6006 film camera. It was a nice, handy size. Not too big, but it had two-layer compartments and I could fit a lot of gear into it, including two camera bodies. When I went digital I decided I needed a bigger bag. Surprizingly I couldn't hold that much more gear, although the gear itself was heavier.

Reply
Nov 27, 2018 11:05:03   #
Naptown Gaijin
 
WOW!! 18 REPLIES IN 15 HOURS!! THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH FOR THE SUGGESTIONS, AND HOPE Y'ALL HAVE A HAPPY HOLIDAY SEASON!!!!

Reply
Nov 27, 2018 11:16:10   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
Naptown Gaijin wrote:
Interested in hearing opinions from people who HAVE EXPERIENCE with at least 2 of these 3 brands and can make a valid comparison. Obviously, if you have used only one, then you can't compare from personal experience.

I have a Panasonic Lumix GC-9 with the following lenses: 100-300mm f4-5.6, 12-35mm f2.8, 42.5mm f1.2, 60mm f2.8 Macro; a Godox ving flash; 5-6 filters, and assorted extra batteries, lens cloth, etc., and sometimes carrying a tripod.

Leaning towards cloth vs leather and prefer lightweight. Prefer something that doesn't scream "PHOTOGRAPHER !!!".

At age 70, I'm NOT going trekking or hiking..... hell, I'm not even walking far.

Prefer something that gives me quick access to my camera in case I spot something fleeting. (Isn't that an interesting word?) So, kinda think buckles that are hard to open or sticking zippers is too much of a pain to deal with.

Prices change and are not really important to me. QUALITY and ease of use, and comfort is important.

I will not be expanding beyond the above, and not getting a FF Canon or Nikon in the future, so don't need something overly large to "grow into".

Greatly appreciate in advance your thoughtful consideration and recommendations.
Interested in hearing opinions from people who HAV... (show quote)


I have used Tarmac and Lowpro. But ONLY in situations where having a bag that looks like a camera bag is acceptable. Sorry, to me, all three brands mentioned scream camera bag. I have re-purposed bags for more low profile city exploring including an Adidas sport tote and a 45 year old leather shoulder bag. However, both ONA and Billingham make very nice bags that do not look like camera bags. If not looking like a photographer is a requirement, look at other brands.

Reply
 
 
Nov 27, 2018 11:24:39   #
GENorkus Loc: Washington Twp, Michigan
 
Naptown Gaijin wrote:
Interested in hearing opinions from people who HAVE EXPERIENCE with at least 2 of these 3 brands and can make a valid comparison. Obviously, if you have used only one, then you can't compare from personal experience.

I have a Panasonic Lumix GC-9 with the following lenses: 100-300mm f4-5.6, 12-35mm f2.8, 42.5mm f1.2, 60mm f2.8 Macro; a Godox ving flash; 5-6 filters, and assorted extra batteries, lens cloth, etc., and sometimes carrying a tripod.

Leaning towards cloth vs leather and prefer lightweight. Prefer something that doesn't scream "PHOTOGRAPHER !!!".

At age 70, I'm NOT going trekking or hiking..... hell, I'm not even walking far.

Prefer something that gives me quick access to my camera in case I spot something fleeting. (Isn't that an interesting word?) So, kinda think buckles that are hard to open or sticking zippers is too much of a pain to deal with.

Prices change and are not really important to me. QUALITY and ease of use, and comfort is important.

I will not be expanding beyond the above, and not getting a FF Canon or Nikon in the future, so don't need something overly large to "grow into".

Greatly appreciate in advance your thoughtful consideration and recommendations.
Interested in hearing opinions from people who HAV... (show quote)



Having looked for the special bag that does everything I thought I needed, i was surprised after a relative got me a simple, cheap (around $30 usd), and smaller (only holds a camera and three lenses), present sling bag and I had to use it a couple times to show that it was not junk present.

Anyway, that was two years ago. I do lots of freelance work and it seems the cheap bag has become one of my favorites. It's not something I'd take on a plane but in the car is great.

Reply
Nov 27, 2018 12:06:48   #
juan_uy Loc: Uruguay
 
dsmeltz wrote:
I have used Tarmac and Lowpro. But ONLY in situations where having a bag that looks like a camera bag is acceptable. Sorry, to me, all three brands mentioned scream camera bag. I have re-purposed bags for more low profile city exploring including an Adidas sport tote and a 45 year old leather shoulder bag. However, both ONA and Billingham make very nice bags that do not look like camera bags. If not looking like a photographer is a requirement, look at other brands.


Agree.
Although not looking like a photographer is until you see something photo-worthy, take out your camera......and at this point it doesn't make any difference the brand of the bag.

Using "normal" bags with inserts is always a good idea.

Reply
Nov 27, 2018 12:09:35   #
Genessi Loc: SoCal
 
I have the G9 and use the Tenba DNA 11. Inside goes my G9 with100-400 attached on it's side along with my 60macro tucked under a 12-60mm, and 50mm 1.8 inside pocket that fits my I Pad mini also
Naptown Gaijin wrote:
WOW!! 18 REPLIES IN 15 HOURS!! THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH FOR THE SUGGESTIONS, AND HOPE Y'ALL HAVE A HAPPY HOLIDAY SEASON!!!!

pockets for filters, flash, batteries! ETC!! Top loading zipper to access camera with out opening entire bag. Rain cover. GREAT Bag! When not using my !00-400mm, I store it in lowepro bag

Reply
Nov 27, 2018 13:23:41   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
Naptown Gaijin wrote:
Interested in hearing opinions from people who HAVE EXPERIENCE with at least 2 of these 3 brands and can make a valid comparison. Obviously, if you have used only one, then you can't compare from personal experience.

I have a Panasonic Lumix GC-9 with the following lenses: 100-300mm f4-5.6, 12-35mm f2.8, 42.5mm f1.2, 60mm f2.8 Macro; a Godox ving flash; 5-6 filters, and assorted extra batteries, lens cloth, etc., and sometimes carrying a tripod.

Leaning towards cloth vs leather and prefer lightweight. Prefer something that doesn't scream "PHOTOGRAPHER !!!".

At age 70, I'm NOT going trekking or hiking..... hell, I'm not even walking far.

Prefer something that gives me quick access to my camera in case I spot something fleeting. (Isn't that an interesting word?) So, kinda think buckles that are hard to open or sticking zippers is too much of a pain to deal with.

Prices change and are not really important to me. QUALITY and ease of use, and comfort is important.

I will not be expanding beyond the above, and not getting a FF Canon or Nikon in the future, so don't need something overly large to "grow into".

Greatly appreciate in advance your thoughtful consideration and recommendations.
Interested in hearing opinions from people who HAV... (show quote)

They all make great bags, which is best? The one that suits your situation and needs the best, the maker of it has pretty much nothing to do with it!

Reply
 
 
Nov 27, 2018 13:57:08   #
sschonfeld
 
I love the Lowepro slingshot bags. I have both the small and medium size. Cover works great in rain. Larger bag will handle 2 bodies and lenses - but is heavier. At 70 I appreciate the convenience and size.

Reply
Nov 27, 2018 14:12:06   #
RichardSM Loc: Back in Texas
 
Naptown Gaijin wrote:
Interested in hearing opinions from people who HAVE EXPERIENCE with at least 2 of these 3 brands and can make a valid comparison. Obviously, if you have used only one, then you can't compare from personal experience.

I have a Panasonic Lumix GC-9 with the following lenses: 100-300mm f4-5.6, 12-35mm f2.8, 42.5mm f1.2, 60mm f2.8 Macro; a Godox ving flash; 5-6 filters, and assorted extra batteries, lens cloth, etc., and sometimes carrying a tripod.

Leaning towards cloth vs leather and prefer lightweight. Prefer something that doesn't scream "PHOTOGRAPHER !!!".

At age 70, I'm NOT going trekking or hiking..... hell, I'm not even walking far.

Prefer something that gives me quick access to my camera in case I spot something fleeting. (Isn't that an interesting word?) So, kinda think buckles that are hard to open or sticking zippers is too much of a pain to deal with.

Prices change and are not really important to me. QUALITY and ease of use, and comfort is important.

I will not be expanding beyond the above, and not getting a FF Canon or Nikon in the future, so don't need something overly large to "grow into".

Greatly appreciate in advance your thoughtful consideration and recommendations.
Interested in hearing opinions from people who HAV... (show quote)


The main thing is too go in a well managed camera store and look at the types of bag,backpack,shoulder bags, there many types and shapes available for you and if you can bring in your equipment and give it a try. Heck who knows you might buy two bags I did this once I pickup a backpack and a day bag the bag I still use it quite regularly it holds the camera with lens and other zoom lens along a few extra thing I’ll need for day!

Reply
Nov 27, 2018 14:34:21   #
ledoux Loc: New Orleans
 
I'm very pleased with the Mountainsmith Borealis. Been overseas on rugged demanding trips. It does well on all day hikes up a mountain. The waist belt is exemplary. Shoulder straps are very comfortable. It's big though. One is cautioned to not overfill it. I used to use a Thule cameras messenger bag.... Then started having neck issues. Now it's exclusively two shoulder straps.

Reply
Nov 27, 2018 14:50:27   #
AlfredU Loc: Mooresville, NC
 
PixelStan77 wrote:
I am a Think Tank guy. You cannot beat them for quality, ease of us and comfort.

I have had three LowePro bags or packs. They last well and are serviceable, but pale in comparison to anything by Think Tank or their new brand called MindShare. I have a back pack from them that has the padding I need for total comfort and it doesn't scream camera bag like my LowePro gear does. Sorry, only had one small Tamrac bag and never used it much, so I won't comment on that one. Check out Mind Share

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.