Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
new computer suggestions
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Nov 16, 2018 12:10:19   #
kmpankopf Loc: Mid-Michigan; SW Pennsylvania
 
I had mine built by a local store. I listed my components, much what has been mentioned already. For my machine, it compared to a Dell at $1500. I paid less than $800. The local store change me $35 to build it.
I've used Dells a number of times in the past without performance complaint. When I had my own built, I didn't have to put up with any of the 'extras' that come with a Dell or HP. Don't overlook this - that crap takes up space and other resources if you don't know how to remove or disable them.
When I can justify upgrading my Dell laptop, the replacement will be custom built.
BTW, don't shy away from gaming machines. You will appreciate the accelerated graphics - since that is what you are doing. An office machine is not the best choice.
Stay away from the Big Box offerings. They are usually older and under powered.
Good Luck.

Reply
Nov 16, 2018 12:14:23   #
scsdesphotography Loc: Southeastern Michigan
 
Hi Linda, I'm a builder, the specs that rck281 listed for you are on point. Here are your basic considerations, LR will use your graphics card for processing, I recommend a midrange gaming card with 4 GB of vram. PS/PSE loves a fast CPU (think Intel I7 or an AMD Ryzen 7200) and lots of RAM, at least 16 GB. As for storage you'll need a dual system using an SSD to hold your photo editing programs and for very fast boot times (sweet spot is 512 GB) and a capacious HD to store those huge RAW files, at least 2 TB (3 or 4 is better). Also don't forget an external backup drive and an off site backup strategy. Photography is about producing quality images, don't let inadequate hardware slow you down.

Reply
Nov 16, 2018 13:02:07   #
david vt Loc: Vermont
 
Hi

Every 1-2 months a “what new computer” will come, with often spirited discussion. I would search this section for the last year, as I think you will get some good insights

Reply
 
 
Nov 16, 2018 13:02:53   #
tommystrat Loc: Bigfork, Montana
 
rmalarz wrote:
Linda, with editing, memory is more important than outright speed. That and a very good graphics card. --Bob


I heartily second that - get the best graphics card and the most RAM your machine can hold, and it will serve you well...


Reply
Nov 16, 2018 13:06:42   #
tommystrat Loc: Bigfork, Montana
 
scsdesphotography wrote:
Hi Linda, I'm a builder, the specs that rck281 listed for you are on point. Here are your basic considerations, LR will use your graphics card for processing, I recommend a midrange gaming card with 4 GB of vram. PS/PSE loves a fast CPU (think Intel I7 or an AMD Ryzen 7200) and lots of RAM, at least 16 GB. As for storage you'll need a dual system using an SSD to hold your photo editing programs and for very fast boot times (sweet spot is 512 GB) and a capacious HD to store those huge RAW files, at least 2 TB (3 or 4 is better). Also don't forget an external backup drive and an off site backup strategy. Photography is about producing quality images, don't let inadequate hardware slow you down.
Hi Linda, I'm a builder, the specs that rck281 lis... (show quote)


I use 2 - 2TB backup external drives, each fully redundant to the other. That way, I don't use valuable HD space on the computer, and have a complete backup in case one external HD fails. I don't trust cloud backups because I think they are capitalist conspiracies to usurp and steal all our precious family images and sell them to 3rd world dictators and socialist fanatics... pass my tinfoil hat, please!


Reply
Nov 16, 2018 14:17:23   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
Dragonfly wrote:
Gaming computers usually are better for photo editing. Guess it's because of the extra memory and faster processors. I've not updated my computer in 3 years so I'm not much help.


...and "better" VIDEO CARD!

Reply
Nov 16, 2018 15:22:48   #
dino21 Loc: McAllen, TX
 
RCJets] Man you are getting ripped off. You can get new board, new memory matched to your new board, new chip etc for that.

Reply
 
 
Nov 16, 2018 18:18:51   #
linda lagace
 
kmpankopf wrote:
I had mine built by a local store. I listed my components, much what has been mentioned already. For my machine, it compared to a Dell at $1500. I paid less than $800. The local store change me $35 to build it.
I've used Dells a number of times in the past without performance complaint. When I had my own built, I didn't have to put up with any of the 'extras' that come with a Dell or HP. Don't overlook this - that crap takes up space and other resources if you don't know how to remove or disable them.
When I can justify upgrading my Dell laptop, the replacement will be custom built.
BTW, don't shy away from gaming machines. You will appreciate the accelerated graphics - since that is what you are doing. An office machine is not the best choice.
Stay away from the Big Box offerings. They are usually older and under powered.
Good Luck.
I had mine built by a local store. I listed my co... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 16, 2018 18:19:33   #
linda lagace
 
Tks

Reply
Nov 17, 2018 17:41:39   #
MrMophoto Loc: Rhode Island "The biggest little"
 
Dragonfly mentions a gaming computer, I agree; About 18 months ago I was shopping for a new laptop, I teach photography and I work on my own projects a lot. I wanted an SS drive with a fast processor and top shelf graphics, isn't that what every photographer wants? I also run PC, I finally went with a Dell Inspiron 15 7000 With an SS drive and 1TB disc, Intel quad core i7 7th gen, 3+ gHz, Nvidia Geforce GTX graphics card. It ran about $1200. I ordered it direct from Dell and got a great deal on a warranty. When I got the machine it listed itself as a gaming computer. I guess gamers and photographers need the specs.

Reply
Nov 17, 2018 21:58:16   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
MrMophoto wrote:
Dragonfly mentions a gaming computer, I agree; About 18 months ago I was shopping for a new laptop, I teach photography and I work on my own projects a lot. I wanted an SS drive with a fast processor and top shelf graphics, isn't that what every photographer wants? I also run PC, I finally went with a Dell Inspiron 15 7000 With an SS drive and 1TB disc, Intel quad core i7 7th gen, 3+ gHz, Nvidia Geforce GTX graphics card. It ran about $1200. I ordered it direct from Dell and got a great deal on a warranty. When I got the machine it listed itself as a gaming computer. I guess gamers and photographers need the specs.
Dragonfly mentions a gaming computer, I agree; Ab... (show quote)


The only real difference I’d be aware of is that you don’t need the extensive VRAM on the video card for rendering that gamers usually specify.

Reply
 
 
Nov 19, 2018 01:23:39   #
scsdesphotography Loc: Southeastern Michigan
 
TriX wrote:
The only real difference I’d be aware of is that you don’t need the extensive VRAM on the video card for rendering that gamers usually specify.


LR does use the GPU and its VRAM.

Reply
Nov 19, 2018 10:16:18   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
scsdesphotography wrote:
LR does use the GPU and its VRAM.


No arguement, just that 6-8GB VRAM, which is often used for gaming is unnecessary for rendering photos - more useful to spend the money on more DRAM, a larger SSD or a nicer monitor (in my opinion) 2GB VRAM should be more than enough.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.