Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Worthy alternative to Lightroom for Fuji X Users
Page <prev 2 of 2
Nov 1, 2018 09:27:08   #
craggycrossers Loc: Robin Hood Country, UK
 
berchman wrote:
Thanks for this useful tip. A few years ago I transitioned from Nikon full frame to Fuji, X-T1, X-T2, X-T3. I used to read that Capture One did a better job with Fuji RAW files than did Lightroom. However, my one experience using Capture One for tethering in a light painting workshop, led me to avoid it like the plague because it was so complex, even though it was said to be the program of choice for tethering.

To change the subject, how old is that "girl" in your portrait? She looks like a mature woman to me. Unless for some perverse reason she wants her skin to look like that, I would do some serious post processing on it.
Thanks for this useful tip. A few years ago I tran... (show quote)


I too have long read in Fuji groups how Capture One better reproduces Fuji raw files. However, I'm no pro, and my processing needs are simple, so have been happy "for my own purposes" to use LR ....... and Capture One IS expensive to buy ! I'm trying the "Fuji Express" version because there is a "Quick Fix" tab which is OK for my use. And only been using it for a few days now. Each of us needs to evaluate it for their own use ....... I am, in this post, just "the messenger".

Regarding "the girl". No idea who she is or how old. I don't view it as portrait, because I never even spoke to her ...... she's just one of a few people in an outdoor bar whose photo I took with my 56mm lens. I don't even know if she knew I was taking it. Also, she does have a sun tan and little make up. We've had a warm summer here and this was a warm late summer afternoon. I "take 'em as I see 'em" ...... the exposure was good in camera ....... so I didn't do much to it in post. No need to "touch it up" to make her look better for her or any possible magazine !

I used to love the Nikon 85mm f1.8. For me this 56mm Fuji is just as good !

Reply
Nov 1, 2018 10:41:07   #
berchman Loc: South Central PA
 
craggycrossers wrote:

I used to love the Nikon 85mm f1.8. For me this 56mm Fuji is just as good !


I used to use the Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 for portraits. Fuji's 50-140 f/2.8 is pretty bulky and heavy but not nearly as much as the Nikon. I bought it to photograph mountain gorillas in Uganda, but I've used it for portraits and it's fantastically sharp and quick to focus. I don't use primes; they're not as versatile as zooms. Also, this particular lens is weather sealed, has OIS, and is faster to focus than the 56mm Fuji.

Reply
Nov 1, 2018 10:41:47   #
korat Loc: Eastern Shore Virginia
 
[quote=craggycrossers]
...Regarding "the girl". No idea who she is or how old. I don't view it as portrait, because I never even spoke to her ...... she's just one of a few people in an outdoor bar whose photo I took with my 56mm lens. I don't even know if she knew I was taking it. Also, she does have a sun tan and little make up. We've had a warm summer here and this was a warm late summer afternoon. I "take 'em as I see 'em" ...... the exposure was good in camera ....... so I didn't do much to it in post. No need to "touch it up" to make her look better for her or any possible magazine !

Actually, her "natural" look is one of the qualities I like best about the shot.

Reply
 
 
Nov 1, 2018 10:42:04   #
craggycrossers Loc: Robin Hood Country, UK
 
lamiaceae wrote:
LOL, Sorry, I have to laugh at that "Canikon" comment. Some (possibly ignorant photographers) seem to say the same thing about Pentax, "not enough lenses." Thing is, it is not actually true in the practical sense. Considering one can use all Pentax lenses since the earliest Takumar M-42 Screw Mount lenses to todays K-mount D FA lenses, there are probably far more lenses choices for Pentax than Canon and possibly Nikon as well (thinking of F-AI onward). How many lenses does one need? I own about 35 lenses (both prime and zoom) that could fit my Pentax SLR and DSLR cameras (in many series, M-42, K, M, A, FA, DA, DA* -- I don't own any D FA or (HD) DFA Pentax lenses), but I mainly use only 5 of the 35.

Yes, my experiences with photographic equipment is fairly extensive: 35mm, 6x6cm, 6x7cm, Rangefinder, SLR, TLR, 4x5" View Camera, 8x10" View Camera! I wish my diversity of subjects and locations was larger or at least had been larger when I was more able to get around. We seem to share a shooting experience thought. I have done Spanish dancing once and have done extensive music event / musician photography.
LOL, Sorry, I have to laugh at that "Canikon&... (show quote)


Nice pics, Mike !

You say you're interested in the X-Pro2. I had it before I eventually decided that "rangefinder style" was not for me. Sold it Sept 2017 to enable purchase of the T2. They both have same sensor.

A couple of shots from Feb 2017 with my Pro2.


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Nov 1, 2018 10:46:09   #
craggycrossers Loc: Robin Hood Country, UK
 
[quote=korat]
craggycrossers wrote:

...Regarding "the girl". No idea who she is or how old. I don't view it as portrait, because I never even spoke to her ...... she's just one of a few people in an outdoor bar whose photo I took with my 56mm lens. I don't even know if she knew I was taking it. Also, she does have a sun tan and little make up. We've had a warm summer here and this was a warm late summer afternoon. I "take 'em as I see 'em" ...... the exposure was good in camera ....... so I didn't do much to it in post. No need to "touch it up" to make her look better for her or any possible magazine !

Actually, her "natural" look is one of the qualities I like best about the shot.
br ...Regarding "the girl". No idea who... (show quote)


Yeah …… me too !

Reply
Nov 1, 2018 14:20:21   #
al13
 
craggycrossers wrote:
Just as example here's a couple of pics just edited ....... the girl - Fuji X-T2 / 56mm f1.2 lens, 1/640, f1.4, ISO 200.

The leaf ........ Fuji X-T2 / 56mm lens / 1/13,000 (!!), f2, ISO 200 ....... you can tell the camera in a menu to use either the manual or the electronic shutter depending upon exposure needs.

I just realized you can be seen taking the picture in her mirrored lens. My kind of photography.

Reply
Nov 1, 2018 14:46:59   #
le boecere
 
[quote=korat]
craggycrossers wrote:

...Regarding "the girl". No idea who she is or how old. I don't view it as portrait, because I never even spoke to her ...... she's just one of a few people in an outdoor bar whose photo I took with my 56mm lens. I don't even know if she knew I was taking it. Also, she does have a sun tan and little make up. We've had a warm summer here and this was a warm late summer afternoon. I "take 'em as I see 'em" ...... the exposure was good in camera ....... so I didn't do much to it in post. No need to "touch it up" to make her look better for her or any possible magazine !

Actually, her "natural" look is one of the qualities I like best about the shot.
br ...Regarding "the girl". No idea who... (show quote)


I agree...

Reply
 
 
Nov 1, 2018 14:48:51   #
craggycrossers Loc: Robin Hood Country, UK
 
berchman wrote:
I used to use the Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 for portraits. Fuji's 50-140 f/2.8 is pretty bulky and heavy but not nearly as much as the Nikon. I bought it to photograph mountain gorillas in Uganda, but I've used it for portraits and it's fantastically sharp and quick to focus. I don't use primes; they're not as versatile as zooms. Also, this particular lens is weather sealed, has OIS, and is faster to focus than the 56mm Fuji.


Agree with you about the 50-140 ...... infact it's the one other lens that I could make use of. Yes, it's heavy in comparison to my primes, but more versatile, for me, than say the 90mm. Just got to drag myself into buying it ! It hovers around the £1100 mark refurb from Fuji, and £900 on the used market here. I "um", then I "ah" ad infinitum !

Reply
Nov 1, 2018 14:49:54   #
craggycrossers Loc: Robin Hood Country, UK
 
al13 wrote:
I just realized you can be seen taking the picture in her mirrored lens. My kind of photography.


Well spotted !

Reply
Nov 1, 2018 14:50:50   #
le boecere
 
al13 wrote:
I just realized you can be seen taking the picture in her mirrored lens. My kind of photography.


Yes, I'd not noticed it till you pointed it out. Very cool!

Reply
Nov 1, 2018 15:59:24   #
le boecere
 
craggycrossers wrote:
Woke up to your reply. Mike, and thanks.

Your experience with photography far outweighs my own ! My ex-wife used to tell me that my family pics (taken with an old Nikon film camera) were terrible. My knowledge and use of "old 35mm film" is negligible ! So I kinda ditched the whole idea for a long time, until 2003 when I decided to have another go and bought a Canon point-and-shoot. But it wasn't until my brother (in Germany) bought a Nikon D70 that I got a little more serious and bought a D80. Think he was a little "miffed", if you get my meaning ! After drifting to D300, then to D700, I looked at my personal usage and the lens focal lengths I was most using. I laugh when I see folks here lambasting Fuji because they don't have as wide a choice of lenses as, say Canikon, for I'd cut my own down to 3 (AF-S 28mm f1.8, AF-S 50mm f1.8 and AF-S 85mm f1.8) and I always wondered why Canikon fans "appeared" to need the whole gamut of lenses from their own particular manufacturer.

When I got rid of the big, heavy, obtrusive, noisy D700 I simply thought "what lenses do I need?" One of my interests is dancing (and photographing) Argentine tango. Tango dancers, especially women, don't like or even appreciate, a flash going off when they're "lost in the dance" ...... even though many have their eyes closed ! So I wanted similar focal length, fast lenses from Fuji to avoid flash. Simple as that ! The 35mm f1.4 is great for that, but has only become faster at focusing as camera auto focus capabilities improved. With the X-E1 I almost had to wait in low light until the dancers paused, otherwise there was big chance of blurry shots !

One of the attributes of the X-T3 that really attracts me is the new sensor and processor which, in combination, greatly improve speed and focusing capability and, I read, makes my lenses (23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4 and 56mm f1.2) much faster to focus in low light. The other thing is that, when primes is all you have, you learn to compose shots differently, so I often go out now just one of my 3 lenses on camera and see how many different shots I can get ...... get creative and you quickly discover that the 85 mm focal length doesn't need to be "just a portrait lens" !

Of course these fast lenses are eminently capable in normal lighting conditions, and the electronic shutter will go up to 1/32,000 ........ allowing the lenses to be used wide open in natural light without needing filters. I would add that the X100 series, alone in Fuji cameras, also comes with a built-in ND filter.

Ask questions as you learn. I'll be happy to help if I can !
Woke up to your reply. Mike, and thanks. br br Y... (show quote)


Geoff, I very much enjoyed reading a bit of your history, and especially your photography "gear" history. And, your pics with the 56mm f/1.2 are now perking my interest in that lens (dang it!) That leads me to a question (as I tend to shoot the same types of images that you do): Have you ever tried one of the "Fujichron" lenses in the same low-light situations?

(Now, aren't you glad you re-formed and re-started this post? Several "hoggers" seem to be enjoying and contributing.)

Reply
 
 
Nov 1, 2018 18:27:30   #
craggycrossers Loc: Robin Hood Country, UK
 
le boecere wrote:
Geoff, I very much enjoyed reading a bit of your history, and especially your photography "gear" history. And, your pics with the 56mm f/1.2 are now perking my interest in that lens (dang it!) That leads me to a question (as I tend to shoot the same types of images that you do): Have you ever tried one of the "Fujichron" lenses in the same low-light situations?

(Now, aren't you glad you re-formed and re-started this post? Several "hoggers" seem to be enjoying and contributing.)
Geoff, I very much enjoyed reading a bit of your h... (show quote)


Hi Van - amazing how much a little "knowledge of the system" helps produces results, eh?

Regarding Fujicron lenses …. I'm assuming you mean the smaller, lighter, fast-focusing 23, 35 and 50mm f2's ?

http://fujicron.com/about/

Short answer, simple as ever for me - no never tried them. I bought my 35 f1.4 and 56 f1.2 before the f2 series was released. The 23 f1.4 was purchased last, but from a friend fairly locally, and for a great price compared to what it goes for now. Much as I like the idea of the newer lenses being faster focusing I cannot justify doubling up on my current lenses, all of which are recognised as being amongst the best XF lenses anyway.

But I think the f2's are doing well and it becomes a matter of personal choice which way you go.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.