Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Lens purchase advice
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Oct 12, 2018 14:13:11   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
So is happiness, excitement, and laughter.


But they are sooo much cheaper.

Reply
Oct 12, 2018 14:55:07   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
UTMike wrote:
But they are sooo much cheaper.


Indeed.
And usually more palatable by one’s spouse.

Reply
Oct 12, 2018 16:30:23   #
Bill P
 
Lots of ideas. For me, the 50 has never been even a bit nifty. During my brief experience with the Contax G2, I discovered the 45mm fitted my vision perfectly. Not much different I know, but for me it made a difference. When I went m4/3, I got the panasonic 20, and still love it, but I've never been able to come to grips with a 35. It was later in my career when I took a liking to travel photography, and discovered that I could do street photography most effectively with a 28. Apparently like the Shadow, I can be invisible.

And strangely, for a good part of my career I was doing commercial work, where I shot construction projects on jobsites. Mush of this was shot with a Nikon D3, and almost always with the 17-35 zoom.

So go ahead, say it, Bill's nuts.

Reply
 
 
Oct 12, 2018 17:22:29   #
ronaldwrightdallas
 
I just got the 28f2 lens to be my walk around (maybe).
on a short trip a few months ago, I restricted myself to the samyang 35F2.8 set mainly at f8. this worked pretty well but I think the 28 will be sharper.

my main plan is to go with light lenses only whenever possible. I loved the 24-70 nikon lens with my d800 but just too heavy now days. Now shooting a6500 or a7rm3.

Reply
Oct 12, 2018 19:16:13   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
Bill P wrote:
Lots of ideas. For me, the 50 has never been even a bit nifty. During my brief experience with the Contax G2, I discovered the 45mm fitted my vision perfectly. Not much different I know, but for me it made a difference. When I went m4/3, I got the panasonic 20, and still love it, but I've never been able to come to grips with a 35. It was later in my career when I took a liking to travel photography, and discovered that I could do street photography most effectively with a 28. Apparently like the Shadow, I can be invisible.

And strangely, for a good part of my career I was doing commercial work, where I shot construction projects on jobsites. Mush of this was shot with a Nikon D3, and almost always with the 17-35 zoom.

So go ahead, say it, Bill's nuts.
Lots of ideas. For me, the 50 has never been even ... (show quote)


Bill's helpful.

Reply
Oct 12, 2018 21:23:39   #
ecurb1105
 
UTMike wrote:
I have been actively attempting to improve my photography for the last couple of years. I mainly photograph landscapes with some flowers and grandkids thrown in. This, of course, has resulted in several GAS attacks. I now have a Sony a7riii body with a Sony 24 - 70 GM lens and a Sony 100 - 400 GM lens. Now Sony has come out with its highly touted 24mm prime. The question I have is whether this would be a good "walk around, general purpose" addition or is there another lens I should be considering.

Thanks!
I have been actively attempting to improve my phot... (show quote)


You seem to have most focal lengths covered except the really wide angles. So, unless you have a real need for fast primes, consider extreme wide angles. Check Sonys 12-24 or a 14mm.

Reply
Oct 13, 2018 00:11:05   #
stevefrankel
 
I'm very pleased with the Sony 55mm 1.8 lens. According to the companies that follow that kind of thing, it's one of the sharpest lenses that's been tested. It's only 8 ounces in weight (a fraction of your other lenses) and on my a7R II it focuses almost instantly. I've paired it with the Tamron f2.8 28-75mm lens which is another high-quality, very light lens. As a travel photographer, these two lenses are all I need to take around the world since I've paired it with the Sony RX100-m6 that has a 24-200mm range. Further, everything fits in a small camera bag that weights less than six pounds.

Reply
 
 
Oct 13, 2018 14:55:07   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
stevefrankel wrote:
I'm very pleased with the Sony 55mm 1.8 lens. According to the companies that follow that kind of thing, it's one of the sharpest lenses that's been tested. It's only 8 ounces in weight (a fraction of your other lenses) and on my a7R II it focuses almost instantly. I've paired it with the Tamron f2.8 28-75mm lens which is another high-quality, very light lens. As a travel photographer, these two lenses are all I need to take around the world since I've paired it with the Sony RX100-m6 that has a 24-200mm range. Further, everything fits in a small camera bag that weights less than six pounds.
I'm very pleased with the Sony 55mm 1.8 lens. Acco... (show quote)


Good tip, Steve. Thanks!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.