As to an artistic concept, each stands individually - the issue is - Do I like the different treatments? I do, I would put them in an album and look at each - like one better today, another tomorrow.
I most certainly don't. Every pictures a story, it should have feeling. It must mean something to the owner, have atmosphere, filters used judiciously can aid that process... Perhaps you don't like Picasso or Bob Carlos Clarke either?
I most certainly don't. Every pictures a story, it should have feeling. It must mean something to the owner, have atmosphere, filters used judiciously can aid that process... Perhaps you don't like Picasso or Bob Carlos Clarke either?
I most certainly don't. Every pictures a story, it should have feeling. It must mean something to the owner, have atmosphere, filters used judiciously can aid that process... Perhaps you don't like Picasso or Bob Carlos Clarke either?
What do these techniques do to enhance the nude? One step further, why use a nude photo?
Why not? Why should a nude make any difference? It is manipulating the image to tell a story. The model is part of the story. In this instance, she is nude. A naked truck would be telling a different story.
I, for one, see much potential in the two base images. It shows a willingness to experiment with a medium.
I am beginning to appreciate this effort more. The latest is wonderful. Does it matter who the model was? Was this an attempt to ptotect her identity as well?
On the last photo, take out the nude (or if it is a statue) - doesn't improve the work - and it looks a lot like some of the Chinese landscape tapestries I saw in China earlier this year.