Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Antarctica, equipment to take?
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Sep 23, 2018 09:30:56   #
catterar Loc: Angier, NC
 
I went in March 2017 out of Ushuaia. I took 2 camera bodies, I'm over cautious, if I only had one and it failed for any reason there was nowhere to get another. I was new to photography so got duplicate bodies so I wouldn't have to learn another system. You can rent a duplicate body so you won't have to buy another. I had an 18 to 55mm on one body and a 55 to 300mm on the other. With this set-up I didn't have to change lenses in the field. I bought a water-proof back pack to carry the equipment while onboard the Zodiacs and ashore. While transiting from ship to shore I kept one camera tucked inside my parka so it was easily accessible for shots of whales, seals, penguins and ice bergs, but still protected from splash and spray. I took a tripod ashore on every landing but only used it once. I took three 32Gb SD cards for each body this way I could use a separate card for each landing then upload them to my computer each evening after dinner. I also took two extra fully charged batteries ashore for each camera and had a circular polarizing filter on each lens. Because I was new to photography I bracketed every shot to improve my chance of getting at least one good image with each exposure.
I'll always remember the anticipation of the trip and will never forget the experience. If you have the opportunity to do the polar plunge do it. You will never regret it. Have a great trip.

Reply
Sep 23, 2018 10:31:55   #
BobHartung Loc: Bettendorf, IA
 
Jakob wrote:
I am going to Antarctica in January. I am fairly new to photography. I Have a Canon 5D Mark iv I have just purchased. I upgraded from a rebel t4i. I have been building up lenses and equipment for the last couple of years. The thing is weight. I’m not sure how much stuff I can bring and I don’t want to get down there and not have what I really need. Any feed back would be greatly appreciated.


I would suggest something in the wide end of the spectrum (24-70) as previously noted and something with moderate reach (200-300mm). Two good zoom lenses should stand you in good stead. Be prepared for hand held shooting.

I am not sure if I would consider changing lenses aboard a zodiac for fear of water splashing into the camera body. Be sure to query your tour operator.

Reply
Sep 23, 2018 10:44:53   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
Jakob wrote:
I am going to Antarctica in January. I am fairly new to photography. I Have a Canon 5D Mark iv I have just purchased. I upgraded from a rebel t4i. I have been building up lenses and equipment for the last couple of years. The thing is weight. I’m not sure how much stuff I can bring and I don’t want to get down there and not have what I really need. Any feed back would be greatly appreciated.


Go on some local outings and take a lot of equipment with you and see how it goes. Nobody can tell you what you can and can't handle but you yourself. Just pack a bunch of lenses and cameras in a backpack and perhaps sling one around your neck or over your shoulder and take it in your car with you and then walk with it down some trails. You be able to see how heavy it is and how much it's worth taking that much weight. When you've got the weight down to a manageable number, then inventory your equipment, tally the type of subjects you intend to shoot while in Antarctica and then pack for that keeping your weight down to the most manageable number you've predetermined.

Reply
 
 
Sep 23, 2018 10:54:41   #
windshoppe Loc: Arizona
 
JEMJR wrote:
I was there last January on a Nat Geo cruise from Ushuia, Argentina. We had many landings, sometimes 2/day. IMO, you’ll need only 2 lenses, 24-105, & 100-300. You’ll be on & off the boat, so make sure to have a waterproof bag.
Also, if you’re on a Nat Geo tour, they will provide a nice warm parka.


Having done that trip a few years ago I totally agree with JEMR.

Reply
Sep 23, 2018 11:36:16   #
LA Loc: Little Rock, AR
 
It's easy to think an penguins and whales and seals and such and think only about tele. But the scenery is equally amazing so you want wide angle as well. Two lenses should cover it...or one if you have the lens. You do not want to be changing lenses willy-nilly.

Reply
Sep 23, 2018 12:49:34   #
ORpilot Loc: Prineville, Or
 
I would opt for a good bridge camera and a good waterproof pocket point and shoot camera. Fancy cameras and batteries don't like cold. It is much easier to keep a bridge camera or point and shoot warm than a big bulky DSLR. Enjoy the warming Antarctic.

Reply
Sep 23, 2018 12:53:05   #
mikegreenwald Loc: Illinois
 
Jakob wrote:
I am going to Antarctica in January. I am fairly new to photography. I Have a Canon 5D Mark iv I have just purchased. I upgraded from a rebel t4i. I have been building up lenses and equipment for the last couple of years. The thing is weight. I’m not sure how much stuff I can bring and I don’t want to get down there and not have what I really need. Any feed back would be greatly appreciated.


I’ve taken that trip twice, both times with a 5D III and 5DIV, a 24-105 F4II, a 100-400 and a 1.4x converter. If I were to do the trip again, I’d take exactly the same things. IMPORTANT: get thoroughly familiar with your equipment before the trip, or you’ll miss some great shots. I used no wide angle lens - but shot lots of panoramas, which I processed in Lightroom.
We is a consideration, depending on which trip you take. Some involve charter flights, where the total wt carried in luggage is 20kg, carry-on included, but not the stuff in your pockets.
You don’t need heavy outerwear - the travel company that I used provided weatherproof pants and hooded jackets. Layered clothing is the answer - the weather will be milder than you expect - never below 30 nor higher than low 40s as long as you’re near the coast and on the peninsula.

Reply
 
 
Sep 23, 2018 12:54:08   #
mikegreenwald Loc: Illinois
 
mikegreenwald wrote:
I’ve taken that trip twice, both times with a 5D III and 5DIV, a 24-105 F4II, a 100-400 and a 1.4x converter. If I were to do the trip again, I’d take exactly the same things. IMPORTANT: get thoroughly familiar with your equipment before the trip, or you’ll miss some great shots. I used no wide angle lens - but shot lots of panoramas, which I processed in Lightroom.
We is a consideration, depending on which trip you take. Some involve charter flights, where the total wt carried in luggage is 20kg, carry-on included, but not the stuff in your pockets.
You don’t need heavy outerwear - the travel company that I used provided weatherproof pants and hooded jackets. Layered clothing is the answer - the weather will be milder than you expect - never below 30 nor higher than low 40s as long as you’re near the coast and on the peninsula.
I’ve taken that trip twice, both times with a 5D I... (show quote)


“We” was intended to be “weight”.

Reply
Sep 23, 2018 13:02:45   #
frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.
 
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
As a minimum, something like an 18-300, or whatever the Canon equivalent is, and a 24-70. Your tour operator should have detailed suggestions.



Reply
Sep 23, 2018 15:12:50   #
SkyKing Loc: Thompson Ridge, NY
 
mikegreenwald wrote:
I’ve taken that trip twice, both times with a 5D III and 5DIV, a 24-105 F4II, a 100-400 and a 1.4x converter. If I were to do the trip again, I’d take exactly the same things. IMPORTANT: get thoroughly familiar with your equipment before the trip, or you’ll miss some great shots. I used no wide angle lens - but shot lots of panoramas, which I processed in Lightroom.
We is a consideration, depending on which trip you take. Some involve charter flights, where the total wt carried in luggage is 20kg, carry-on included, but not the stuff in your pockets.
You don’t need heavy outerwear - the travel company that I used provided weatherproof pants and hooded jackets. Layered clothing is the answer - the weather will be milder than you expect - never below 30 nor higher than low 40s as long as you’re near the coast and on the peninsula.
I’ve taken that trip twice, both times with a 5D I... (show quote)



Reply
Sep 23, 2018 15:58:40   #
terpfan Loc: central coast, California
 
Went to Antarctica last January with Linblad. Took my Canon 5D IV with 24-105 and 70-300 for landings and Tamron 150-600 G2 for whale shots from boat. Also took monopod for the 150-600 on the ship. Take some scapolomine patches for seasickness as Drake can be rough. Try them at home before you leave to assure that the side effects don't wipe out the benefits. This was an absolutely amazing trip. We are going to Europe in a week and just got the Think Tank Airport Advantage for the trip. Wish I had it for Antarctica. I can get the 150-600, 70-300, and 24-105 with 2 bodies and flash in it. It's tight but fits. Not taking the 150-600 to Europe, but nice to know it fits.

Reply
 
 
Sep 23, 2018 16:31:17   #
aubreybogle Loc: Albuquerque, NM
 
Dsrapa wrote:
I went many years ago and it was terrific. But the biggest issue is water proofing. If your gear isn’t waterproof get an Olympus tough or something similar to take on the zodiacs. And don’t plan to change lenses.
Crossing from Ushuaia is very rough so assume seasickness (and be grateful if you get a calm day, as we did going back).
Weather can be very changeable from sunny to stormy in a blink so be sure to protect your gear Layer your clothes because when it’s a sunny day it was in the 40s. But in the zodiacs it was freezing and could be damp. Needed wide angle and moderate zoom more than big zoom. And video because penguins are adorable.
I actually left my dslr home and took a water proof and a bridge. Have some fabulous pix and great memories. Have a great trip!
I went many years ago and it was terrific. But th... (show quote)


Concur with this comment concerning water protection for the camera. If the water is choppy, and it probably will be, salt water sea spray in the open Zodiak is a real issue as you transit from your anchored ship to the shore. I own a Canon5D MkIV, and Canon has designed and built it with pretty good weather proofing, but it was not built to be soaked in sea water. Additionally, the lens must be weather sealed, or the camera's weather protection design features will be largely for naught. After a day of shooting, carefully clean the exterior of the lens and camera, and their seals with fresh water. I am not advising against taking this camera ashore with you in Antartica, only continue doing your homework, as you are, and make some fabulous photos..

Reply
Sep 23, 2018 16:34:51   #
ecurb1105
 
Jakob wrote:
I am going to Antarctica in January. I am fairly new to photography. I Have a Canon 5D Mark iv I have just purchased. I upgraded from a rebel t4i. I have been building up lenses and equipment for the last couple of years. The thing is weight. I’m not sure how much stuff I can bring and I don’t want to get down there and not have what I really need. Any feed back would be greatly appreciated.


Are you doing a boat trip around the coastline or are you flying inland and camping?
What lenses do you have?
Do you have a second body?

Reply
Sep 23, 2018 18:29:27   #
EliotN
 
I have been there once. Took tripod and never used it. I don't think you will use the ultra wide much. You use water proof bags to go ashore and put your camera bag in them so you don't need a water proof camera. The suggestion of something like a 24-105 and 80 or 100-400 would be ideal in my opinion. In terms of temperature their summer is similar to winter here (Philadelphia). Take extra battery for cold weather. Do take laptop to download pictures. You will have tons- I had perhaps 10,000+

Reply
Sep 23, 2018 18:48:36   #
Bill P
 
I'd take logs and kindling and matches.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.