Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Cameras in Use - Observation
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Sep 15, 2018 17:47:12   #
CatMarley Loc: North Carolina
 
Shutterbug57 wrote:
There have been several posts asking about the “demise” of the DSLR. Last night was our monthly model night at the club. I took the opportunity to see what camera everybody brought. Our club is made up of pros, enthusiasts and the occasional noob. Last night we had 10 shooters - the Bengals were playing, so a light turnout. Cameras used were:

Mirrorless - 1 (2 if you count the iPhone a noob brought, but he used a D70s offered by a member)
DSLR - 9

DSLR - 9 (6 Nikon, 2 Canon & 1 Pentax)
micro 4:3 - 1 (Olympus IIRC)
FF/APSC MLIC - 0

At least 1 of the DSLR shooters also has a Fuji X-T2 (APSC mirrorless). Several also have film SLR bodies that occasionally show up on studio night. A couple have, and use film medium format cameras too.

There has been some interest in the mirrorless options and a few of the members have purchased a MILC. Only 1 member that I am aware of has made the switch to fully MILC. I am sure MILCs will continue to make inroads, but I doubt most of the members will dump DSLR for MILC in the near future.
There have been several posts asking about the “de... (show quote)


But the big bump in the mirrorless is going to take place this year and next year. The newest and biggest arrivals have not happened yet. Do the survey next year! It will be a different story.

Reply
Sep 16, 2018 01:22:03   #
Merlin1300 Loc: New England, But Now & Forever SoTX
 
Thanks Cat - - My 7D Mk1, 80D, and Canon 100mm f/2.8 IS Macro will wait until next year.

Reply
Sep 17, 2018 20:37:55   #
User ID
 
burkphoto wrote:


If you relied on Tri-X or HP5 at an Exposure Index
of 1600 to 2400, 8x10 was all you dared. Sure, you
could make a 16x20, but it wouldn’t pass close
inspection. m43 does.



Gotta agree on that basis. 2 to 3 stops of
underexposure makes really shittty negs.
So acoarst the bigger you print them the
shittier they look.


`

Reply
 
 
Sep 17, 2018 20:42:39   #
User ID
 
RKL349 wrote:


Really? This must make the assumption that
we cannot sufficiently read the OP’s post!



And thaz a very reasonable assumption
in these forums ....


`

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.