Nikon D7200 vs Nikon D7500
Sep 6, 2018 08:30:21 #
mkiegold86 wrote:
I looked at the D7500 and ended up buying a D7200. The guy at Adorama convinced me that since I don't shoot a lot of video that the difference between the two probably wouldn't be worth the money. Now that I am working with the D7200 I agree. I am very happy with the images I am getting out of the D7200 and don't think I am missing a thing.
As far as the double card slot, I love it since I usually shoot RAW I now shoot RAW + JPG using slot 2 for the JPG.
As far as the double card slot, I love it since I usually shoot RAW I now shoot RAW + JPG using slot 2 for the JPG.
Both cameras stink when it comes to making videos - I'm currently looking at getting a digital video camera.
Sep 6, 2018 08:39:38 #
If I remember correctly, the D7500 can't use older manual focus lenses and have metering. As I have many older MF & AF lenses, that would be a deal breaker for me. I don't shoot video, seldom shoot bursts and have the touchscreen turned off on the camera I own that have it, so no D7500 for me.
Sep 6, 2018 08:44:29 #
I have the Nikon D5300,and I love it. If I were to buy another camera I would go with the newer Nikon D5600. You will save a money and this camera does everything.
Sep 6, 2018 08:50:28 #
I have the D7200 and ordered the D7500. The only thing I liked better was the touch screen. That being said, it was not any better then the D7200. I sold it and ordered another D7200 when they had it in sale. I am a Pro and shoot wild mustangs and landscapes. IMO, I would go with the D7200.
Sep 6, 2018 09:53:01 #
IDguy
Loc: Idaho
There has been considerable discussion of two card slots vs. one following Nikon’s introduction of the Z cameras. The discussion has convinced me it is a mistaken impression that two cards increases reliability over one card. The increased capacity of cards make it irrevelant.
Many things can cause failure of the camera system. Making one part redundant is unlikely to increase the overall system reliability. Two cards might even decrease reliability by adding more parts to fail.
Many things can cause failure of the camera system. Making one part redundant is unlikely to increase the overall system reliability. Two cards might even decrease reliability by adding more parts to fail.
Sep 6, 2018 09:57:31 #
IDguy
Loc: Idaho
wetreed wrote:
I have the Nikon D5300,and I love it. If I were to buy another camera I would go with the newer Nikon D5600. You will save a money and this camera does everything.
That is the upgrade I made. I was surprised by how much I like the touch screen upgrade.
The only thing I don’t like is that Nikon ditched the infrared release in favor of snapbridge. While snapbridge does much more I don’t like needing to have my cell phone vs. the simple infrared release I kept on the camera strap.
Sep 6, 2018 10:02:40 #
linelink wrote:
Need an OPINION between the Nikon D7200 and the Nikon D7500. I have accumulated all kinds of specs and on line threads with regards to their similarities and slight differences. I have read 100s os testimonies to why one should own and love the D7200. Rather then rent each one and road testing each, I was hoping to find a hogger who actually owned both. Or perhaps someone that has a lot of experience with each camera in the field. I can only afford one. What should it be. Thanks in advance
I don't have the D7500 but own the D7200 since last year....I can tell you I love it...however, they are both great cameras and I too had to decide between those models and also just going straight to the D500. I liked the idea of 2 card slots on the 7200 but was not really necessary. The 7500 is the junior version of the D500 rather than an upgrade of the 7200. Money wasn't too much of an issue but I felt that the D500 was a bit overkill for me (or so I thought at the time)...but now that I am shooting BIF (or practicing) I can now see the 7500 or 500 would come in handy. The tilt screen is nice as well as the faster AF/ expeed5. If you are shooting fast moving subjects and can get along with a single slot (most enthusiasts should) then go for the 7500. At this point I will either upgrade to the D500 or straight to an 850 at some time within the next 6 months or so (after wintertime, next spring perhaps).
Sep 6, 2018 10:38:47 #
Sep 6, 2018 10:40:43 #
Sep 6, 2018 10:42:26 #
Sep 6, 2018 10:42:52 #
It all depends on what you shoot. If you shoot sports or have low-light needs, def. go with the D7500. Prior to purchasing a camera for my daughter I discussed these two cameras with Steve Perry. Based on her needs which included both outdoor and indoor sports, the D7500 was preferable. It also has a nice fold out viewing screen. Having tried it myself at the full 8fps, it sounds like a machine gun!! If sports or wildlife is not what you shoot, the D7200 would be perfect.
I will say, that I wonder at times, since the D7500 has many of the capabilities of the D500 except for focus, whether we should have gone for the D500. It's bigger, heavier, and much more expensive, however. Its focus capabilities sure would be nice, though.
I will say, that I wonder at times, since the D7500 has many of the capabilities of the D500 except for focus, whether we should have gone for the D500. It's bigger, heavier, and much more expensive, however. Its focus capabilities sure would be nice, though.
Sep 6, 2018 10:51:20 #
Thanks Chris-Optical. Points well taken. BIF will be a big issue for me. I know that there is overwhelming evidence all over this site on behalf of the D7200. Just needed to find more evidence for the D7500. I realize that the best option may be the D500, but I am retired on SS, and it’s out of my reach. I get the urge from time to time to pull a trigger, what many refer to on this site as GAS. However, just like stomach gas, I just wait til it passes!
Sep 6, 2018 11:05:12 #
Sep 6, 2018 11:11:00 #
Thank you Thank you Thank you SteveR. Mr. Perry’s imput carries a lot of weight. Appreciate your additional words with regards to the D7500 vs the D500
Sep 6, 2018 11:13:55 #
I have the d7500 and do not feel it lacks for anything I need. Love the ergonomics, size and weight, low light capabilities, weather resistance, responsiveness. I like the availability of the AF-P lenses. And now with the intro of the new AF-P 500 mm lens where else can you get that reach for about 3 pounds. And the 300 mm AF-P for about 27 ounces. This camera was my return to Nikon- had it just over a year and have been very satisfied.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.