Being an Ugly Hedgehogger Has Its Privileges!
Aug 12, 2018 18:05:39 #
Aug 12, 2018 18:14:09 #
kskarma wrote:
Let me add my 2 pixels worth to this discussion ab... (show quote)
I've come to avoid saying "That settles that once and for all" on UHH because, I believe, we all know the debate about this lens will go on and on. That said, KKH's image and story (both here and in its parent thread: https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-532039-1.html) sure offer visual proof that extremely sharp images can be had with this lens. Thanks for posting.
Aug 12, 2018 18:54:18 #
Des:
Where (in what ensemble) are you playing Euphonium? I think there is a definite tie in between musical performance and photography. Play on and keep taking photos!!
Where (in what ensemble) are you playing Euphonium? I think there is a definite tie in between musical performance and photography. Play on and keep taking photos!!
Aug 12, 2018 19:59:46 #
kskarma
Loc: Topeka, KS
Andy, Bob, Cameraf4....thanks to you for your 'spot on' observations and tolerant attitudes... The important thing in all of this is that we develop a set of gear, approaches, procedures and processes that get the results that 'fit' each person on here. While I can....and do...often respond to a question about "how do YOU do this...or that?"....I certainly can't ever say that my opinion or advice fits YOUR situation. Some of the extensive threads on UHH that offer tons of conflicting advice..."You MUST do...or buy...or operate....in this manner...", seem to me that, without knowing the goals and limitations of each camera user, it's just impossible to set any kind of rigid rule or advice. So that's MY advice......grins...! 
Aug 12, 2018 20:16:13 #
kskarma wrote:
Some of the extensive threads on UHH that offer tons of conflicting advice..."You MUST do...or buy...or operate....in this manner...", seem to me that, without knowing the goals and limitations of each camera user, it's just impossible to set any kind of rigid rule or advice. So that's MY advice......grins...!
Exactly. Sorting the wheat from the chaff is sometimes difficult if you don't have confidence in your opinions or background in the subject matter. Which, of course, is precisely why you might be asking the question in the first place.
I agree on this point - the more definitive and proscriptive the advice, the less reliable it may be. Those who recognize that answers might be different for different people are the ones I trust the most.
Andy
Aug 12, 2018 22:13:17 #
YES: "You really can't stop the trolls. They thrive on your reaction and if you respond, they have you."
I put it this way: Do not feed the trolls.
I put it this way: Do not feed the trolls.
Haydon wrote:
Point taken but at the same time people get upset with people that they will never meet and take it to heart. You really can't stop the trolls. They thrive on you reaction and if you respond, they have you. Great line from a movie it doesn't matter what others think its when you start believing what they say:)
BTW - I returned my 28-300 Canon for poor image quality after three days. Others have to judge for themselves whether it meets their needs.
BTW - I returned my 28-300 Canon for poor image quality after three days. Others have to judge for themselves whether it meets their needs.
Aug 12, 2018 23:48:35 #
I don't like to criticize others photos because I know mine are not always the greatest but the total sharpness of the saguaro on the right draws my attention away from the rest of the picture. Not to say you are wrong - just my opinion.
Aug 13, 2018 01:29:55 #
therwol
Loc: USA
DesRose wrote:
Regarding the Nikon FX 28-300mm zoom lens we settled opinions once and for all (for the haters out there) that this lens IS viable as a good walk around/travel lens. :
I'm so glad you settled this issue. I can sleep tonight knowing that I won't wake up to another 50 posts about it. Maybe I'm already asleep and I'm dreaming.
Aug 13, 2018 11:10:25 #
Quinn 4 wrote:
I have no problem with poking fun at someone, but some member go to far to the point of degrading another member and will use trash talk at someone and think it is fun.
I agree- trash talk and degrading others are unacceptable.
Aug 13, 2018 11:12:40 #
Aug 13, 2018 11:13:24 #
Aug 13, 2018 11:34:32 #
Kiron Kid wrote:
In my opinion and experience, those ÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂsuperzoomsÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂàare fine for casual snapshots. But fall way short for professional applications. However, whatever lens one decides to use, is their business and I donÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂt care. Poke away. ÃÂÃÂÃÂðÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ
Here are 3 of my photos taken with this lens that have taken 1st place in the PRO division at our Arizona State Fair. I figure if it's good enough for the judges (and people I sell to), then it's good enough for me. I'm not saying it's a GREAT lens but I think it's certainly good enough or 'viable' to be used as an all around or travel lens (for those that ask about it). BTW...all 3 photos including the moon shots were taken handheld.
Aug 13, 2018 11:35:50 #
Aug 13, 2018 11:43:04 #
cameraf4 wrote:
I've come to avoid saying "That settles that once and for all" on UHH because, I believe, we all know the debate about this lens will go on and on. That said, KKH's image and story (both here and in its parent thread: https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-532039-1.html) sure offer visual proof that extremely sharp images can be had with this lens. Thanks for posting.
I was totally joking or being sarcastic when I made that comment... as if two Ugly Hedgehoggers meeting for lunch could settle a debate once and for all on any issue. Right or wrong I assumed people would see the humor in my comment.
Aug 13, 2018 11:45:53 #
jerryc41 wrote:
Phew! That's a relief. I guess I'll keep mine, then. 
LOL
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.