I haven't read the decision yet, but I think that the logic will likely not be overturned.

I agree completely that the sales tax is the most regressive, both in terms of who pays it and its effect on the economy. Even the poorest really HAVE to purchase stuff, and pay a higher percentage of their income toward it. And the recent tax code changes eliminating its deductibility just make things worse.

On the second point, we are a consumer driven economy, unquestionably. Yacht purchases don't fuel it, and neither do state tax collections. Spending on consumer goods is the great driver of manufacturing and job creation. I'd love to see states move away from a taxation policy that inarguably hurts consumer spending.

It doesn't really matter much personally to me - I live in a state that has no sales tax. I earn my income in another state and pay income tax there, which I am much more comfortable with. And of course, I NEVER make big ticket purchases there if possible. I come home to New Hampshire and buy it there instead, or buy it over the web where I don't (and won't have to in the future) pay it.

Sales taxes are bad business for all, in my opinion.

Andy

It was never the business that was being taxed, it was the consumer. The business is just collecting it and passing it on. As we have seen in this thread alone, if it was left up to the consumer the state would never get a lot of what was owed.

Years back, in NY, sales tax was submitted quarterly. The business was allowed to hold the money in an interest bearing account. The interest was supposed to be a token payment for doing the work. I believe it was in the '70s they switched payments to monthly if sales exceeded a certain amount.

States have the right to tax. The Supreme Court just confirmed that taxing out of state sales did not violate the Constitution. At the root of it all, the Constitution should be the basis for all their decisions.

--

I agree. Each state charges sales tax to be used exclusively for that state's purposes for sales taxes. It's simple for me. If I purchase an item over the internet from a state which has no state sales tax base then I would not expect to be charged sales tax on that item. The fact the item is being sent to a state that taxes such items has absolutely no bearing on that transaction. Conversely, if I purchased an item over the internet from a state that charges sales tax then I would expect that states sales tax to be figured into the transaction. This is only right.

Concerning used items: If a person operates a for-profit business selling used goods then why would you believe that person should be exempt from charging sales tax?