PixelStan77 wrote:
Consider the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 Mirrorless Micro Four Thirds Digital Camera with 12-32mm and 45-150mm Lenses
An all-around Micro Four Thirds camera designed for photographers and videographers, the black Lumix DMC-GX85 from Panasonic features a compact build and intuitive layout, along with a feature-set to suit a multimedia lifestyle. Utilizing a 16MP Live MOS sensor, which lacks an optical low-pass filter for increased sharpness, the GX85 is capable of shooting continuously at up to 10 fps with single-shot autofocus, or 6 fps with continuous autofocus, as well as up to 40 fps when using an electronic shutter function. UHD 4K video recording is also supported in 30 and 24 fps frame rates, as well as Full HD 1080p, and the 4K recording abilities also permit shooting 8MP stills at a 30 fps rate. A sensitivity range up to ISO 25600 permits working in difficult and low-light settings while 5-axis sensor-shift image stabilization also helps to minimize the appearance of camera shake for sharper handheld shooting. Spanning a broad range of features for both still and moving images, the GX85 is a versatile mirrorless camera further characterized by its sleek form factor and connected functionality.
Complementing the imaging attributes, the camera also incorporates both a 2.76m-dot electronic viewfinder as well as a 3.0" 1.04m-dot touchscreen LCD, which has a tilting design to better enable working from high and low angles. Built-in Wi-Fi is also integrated into the design, which facilitates wireless image transferring and remote camera control from linked smartphones or tablets.
Consider the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 Mirrorless M... (
show quote)
Shop for used gear. The GX85 or G85 or even a used GH4 would fit your needs nicely. You would still be able to choose from over 90 native lenses.
Consider Olympus micro 4/3s. I traded my beloved Nikon gear for the Olympus OMD E Mark 5 II and I've never been happier. I doubt that going to a point and shoot will make you happier. Dropping the load will.
Keep what you have and if it is necessary learn to operate the D5300 to the best of your abilities.
Your photography will be better that way.
I just picked up a Sony A6000 and am really enjoying it. I otherwise use a Nikon D7200.
Canon makes some great 'pocket size' quality cameras. I was looking at one at Sam's just the other day, 40 zoom, 20 Meg, for $259.00. Great 'walk around' always handy camera.
SONY RX100M5
The new RX100M6 offers a longer zoom. I will be staying with the 5.
I switched from a Nikon D7000 with a Nikkor DX 17-55 f/2.8 lens.
Got tired of the size and weight.
I've looked at a SONY 6500. Not bad size. Not heavy. Perfect right?
Only until you add a HUGE lense to give you what the RX100M5 gives you in a small. lighter package.
The RX100 series of cameras are a no-brainer for someone looking for a high quality (picture wise) pocketable camera.
YES the Nikon, Nikkor combo was little easier to use.
But I could never figure out how to put it into a coat or pants pocket to have it at my beck-an-call.
One thing I always like to mention to folks who are "upgrading" or "downgrading" or otherwise changing their equipment:
A camera is a tool. It simply records an image. It has SOME effect on the impact of an image.
But more important — in most cases — is the nature of the scene or subject you are recording, and the skills with which you light it, time the capture, compose it, pose it, expose it, and so forth. The most important photographic tool you "own" is YOU. Your experience, training, reading, and knowledge are more important than whether you use a particular brand, format, or model of camera.
It has oft been said that a great photographer with an average camera is far more capable than a newbie with the best camera on the planet (whatever that seems to be). Having spent decades working for pro photography companies, and having seen what goes through a lab, I know that to be true.
Whatever you do, invest in time, books, videos, photo outings, and self critiques. Concentrate on getting the best images from your current gear. We split hairs here all the time about whether a D850 or an A7s III is the best in class, or whether one lens is sharper than another. But arguing over how many angels can fit on the head of a pin is not a useful exercise! Actually using your equipment, reviewing your, and others' images, reading about the craft, and watching how to videos are activities that will fuel your creative and technical approaches to photography.
hj wrote:
The OP wants to downsize to a POINT-N-SHOOT. Why do responders insist on offering suggestions for expensive cameras with interchangeable lenses?
In my short time here I have seen many do answers just like politicians. Don't care the question, I have my canned answer. Been interesting seeing suggestions for $1,000 to $2,500 rigs to "downsize" from an $800-900 DSLR kit.
randik wrote:
... but I'd love to downsize ...
I did not "downsize" to a "point and shoot" but did get a Canon SX60HS ... it has everything I need (right now) ... if the need/desire arrises I can always "upsize" to a more robust camera ...
Bob S
I just bought the Oly OM-D E5 Mark II with the "power pancake zoom" and am enjoying learning to use it (steep learning curve, however) and it replaces my long ago and rarely used Nikon D60. I used Olympus film cameras (OM2s plus Oly lenses) for many years on trips and really missed the compactness, the sturdy build, and the lenses. I got my Oly OM-D from KEH. I was able to examine a few cameras at the KEH warehouse in Atlanta, but normally they are online/by mail only. I am planning a trip to Morocco in November and wanted to have a "pocket size" camera. As someone noted, this configuration (the Panasonic is almost identical to the Oly) does fit in a pocket and a longer lens can go in another pocket. I am not an art photographer, but I enjoy travel shots of people, markets, and architecture.
May be you can look into the Sony Rx10 Mark 4.
I had to go to a Bridge camera also, for various reasons, health being one of them. Contrary to what all the DSLR Loyalists write, you will be happy in the future. Can I ask, what do you primarily shoot?? Nature, portraits, family, etc??
And if you are comfortable with your Nikon, you might want to stay with that brand.
Out of the 5 cameras I have with the top end being an older Canon 3Ti , then an SX50 and a couple old Minkotas, I use my Canon G16 about 90% of the time. One handed operation if need be, view finder which I would not buy a camera without. Bought it on Ebay about 5 years ago. Had a couple G series before it.
Just got back from a trip to Lake Tahoe with my new Lumix ZS-100. Wow, is my first reaction. Great photos, excellent zoom, lots of features. A winner in my book.
Thank you for your advice. I appreciate it.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.