Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
What is upper limit for mp and handholding?
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
May 9, 2018 11:06:29   #
Regis Loc: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
 
Dragonophile wrote:
I was reading a thread recently where it was suggested a 50 mp camera requires a tripod for best results. That got me thinking. My camera does about 18 mp and I exclusively hand hold a 100-400 telephoto lens on my crop camera. I am fine with the results. I realize everyone is different in steadiness when it comes to hand holding, but let's assume I'm average. Would I start to get more blur at 25 mp? 30 mp? 40 mp? For those people with higher mp cameras and telephoto lenses, what do you find as your upper limits for CONSISTENTLY getting good hand held shots? I do mostly ships & stationary birds. Does it vary by camera maker depending on how good their image stabilization is?
I was reading a thread recently where it was sugge... (show quote)


I hand hold all my shots using a Canon 5Dsr with a total 800mm prime lens (400mm times 2x extender = 800mm).
If I can do it at 74, then anybody can manage this combo.

Reply
May 9, 2018 11:07:40   #
Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal
 
Dragonophile wrote:
I was reading a thread recently where it was suggested a 50 mp camera requires a tripod for best results. That got me thinking. My camera does about 18 mp and I exclusively hand hold a 100-400 telephoto lens on my crop camera. I am fine with the results. I realize everyone is different in steadiness when it comes to hand holding, but let's assume I'm average. Would I start to get more blur at 25 mp? 30 mp? 40 mp? For those people with higher mp cameras and telephoto lenses, what do you find as your upper limits for CONSISTENTLY getting good hand held shots? I do mostly ships & stationary birds. Does it vary by camera maker depending on how good their image stabilization is?
I was reading a thread recently where it was sugge... (show quote)


I have no such issues with the D850. There may be other secondary factors--the high mp cameras may be a bit heavier (as is the case with the 850) which may cause some stability issues, for example.

Reply
May 9, 2018 11:32:36   #
jimneotech Loc: Michigan
 
Gene51 wrote:
You "may" get better results with a tripod - it depends on what you are shooting and the magnification. A 14mm lens will not shake nearly as much as a 600mm at 14 ft. But a 105mm macro at 12 inches - 1:1 magnification, will require a fairly stiff and massive tripod.

Some camera manufacturers include image stabilization in the body. It is more common to see it in a lens. The newer gear has better stabilization.

That being said - I shot this at about 20 ft distance with a 600mm lens and a 36mp camera - hand held at 1/25 sec. And this was repeatable.
You "may" get better results with a trip... (show quote)


Did your lens have VR?

Reply
 
 
May 9, 2018 11:44:44   #
Harry0 Loc: Gardena, Cal
 
Everything ... is kinda like everything.
PRACTICE makes perfect. Practice a good stance, a firm hold, and a smooth pivot.
Make sure your camera setup is more like action/sports.
Maybe a shallow DoF is zooper kewl, but you'll miss moving objects that way.
I "grew up" with folders and ISO 50 film- a monopod and a cable release doubled my success rate. A tripod or a tabletop was even better.
Today I'm old and decrepit- I always have a cane- and that works as a mono. Since I do Nikons, I have a small assortment of shutter remotes- I can hold/zoom/focus in manual mode and press a button with less shake than doing all that and pressing the shutter.
There are other stabilizers- a buddy uses an old bed brass finial bolted to the bottom as a half pound counterweight. One guy on Youtube uses PVC pipe and sand; another uses a bungie cord hooked to his belt.
It also depends on the person- I know one person who can take great shots holding her camera up and at arms length - if I tried that you'd wonder who I was waving at.
YMMV.

Reply
May 9, 2018 12:14:16   #
Alans844
 
Great shot. I had some concerns about buying an 850. I think that shot convinced me I can do it.

Reply
May 9, 2018 12:17:53   #
CatMarley Loc: North Carolina
 
Dragonophile wrote:
I was reading a thread recently where it was suggested a 50 mp camera requires a tripod for best results. That got me thinking. My camera does about 18 mp and I exclusively hand hold a 100-400 telephoto lens on my crop camera. I am fine with the results. I realize everyone is different in steadiness when it comes to hand holding, but let's assume I'm average. Would I start to get more blur at 25 mp? 30 mp? 40 mp? For those people with higher mp cameras and telephoto lenses, what do you find as your upper limits for CONSISTENTLY getting good hand held shots? I do mostly ships & stationary birds. Does it vary by camera maker depending on how good their image stabilization is?
I was reading a thread recently where it was sugge... (show quote)


All depends on technique, focal length and shutter speed. Given a short focal length, high shutter speed, and handling the camera like an offhand rifle the pixel count does not mean a thing. Longer, slower and shakier does, and the more pixels, the more there is to detect a motion blur. But at best, the difference is going to be infinitesimal.

Reply
May 9, 2018 12:54:32   #
Angmo
 
I did 10 days in the Himalayas. Medium Format. I shot all photos from a tripod using a two button cable shutter release - mirror up wait a moment, then shutter.

No regrets. I can enlarge any photo to 100 inches no sweat.

Reply
 
 
May 9, 2018 13:05:01   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Angmo wrote:
I did 10 days in the Himalayas. Medium Format. I shot all photos from a tripod using a two button cable shutter release - mirror up wait a moment, then shutter.

No regrets. I can enlarge any photo to 100 inches no sweat.


That's what I'm talkin' bout ! ....

..

Reply
May 9, 2018 13:08:53   #
FreddB Loc: PA - Delaware County
 
Dragonophile wrote:
I was reading a thread recently where it was suggested a 50 mp camera requires a tripod for best results. That got me thinking. My camera does about 18 mp and I exclusively hand hold a 100-400 telephoto lens on my crop camera. I am fine with the results. I realize everyone is different in steadiness when it comes to hand holding, but let's assume I'm average. Would I start to get more blur at 25 mp? 30 mp? 40 mp? For those people with higher mp cameras and telephoto lenses, what do you find as your upper limits for CONSISTENTLY getting good hand held shots? I do mostly ships & stationary birds. Does it vary by camera maker depending on how good their image stabilization is?
I was reading a thread recently where it was sugge... (show quote)


I was going to start by saying please correct me if I'm wrong, which is totally unnecessary on here. I wasn't aware that pixels had a weight factor. One's ability to shoot handheld depends on the weight of the equipment versus their hand/arm/upper body strength. Those are affected by our age and physical condition. So, it's either downsize the gear or up size the strength; save the pixel count for another discussion.

Reply
May 9, 2018 13:19:27   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
imagemeister wrote:
That's what I'm talkin' bout ! ....

..


For those wanting to improve your hand holding :http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-236741-1.html

and I really like this bracket with non-slip ergonomic grip - neither of these are available commercially.

..


(Download)

Reply
May 9, 2018 13:39:28   #
Angmo
 
imagemeister wrote:
For those wanting to improve your hand holding :http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-236741-1.html

and I really like this bracket with non-slip ergonomic grip - neither of these are available commercially.

..

Looks like the plumbing on my Anschutz .22 caliber target rifle. Supporting a camera using the large bones of the forearm versus fingers of the hand matters

Reply
 
 
May 9, 2018 14:25:26   #
gwilliams6
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x25oqcFXnjs
Adorama Tv- Mark Wallace on freezing motion, and panning with action. He talks about lens focal length and shutter speeds for handholding.

The inverse rule generally works with stationary subjects. You should shoot handheld with a shutter speed equal or faster than your lens focal length. EX: 125mm focal length, shoot at 125/sec or faster to eliminate motion from camera and lens shake. EX: 24 mm focal length, you could handhold as low as 1/30 sec for stationary object. BUT lens stabilization and/or IBIS (In Body Image Stabilization) allows you to handhold at much slower speeds in modern cameras, some as much as 4-5 stops slower than before. I am able to handhold as slow as 1/4 second with my IBIS in my camera, even with telephoto focal length. I have years of practice in keeping my body and camera steady, but anyone with practice and modern camera/lens combos with lens stabilization and/or IBIS can achieve equal results.

Do not worry about the differences with higher megapixel cameras. That does not matter as much as proper shutter speed for your focal length and any lens and/or in-body stabilization you have. I teach photography at the university level and have to teach my students this and then they have assignments to put all this into practice. I also teach them proper camera holding and body position techniques to help them keep everything steady for shooting with slow shutter speeds and long lenses. Cheers

Reply
May 9, 2018 15:46:41   #
cambriaman Loc: Central CA Coast
 
When I got my D800e a couple of years ago I found the high pixel count did indeed require an improvement in handling skills. It didn't take very long to get the full capability performance as a regular result. Practice, practice, practice!

Reply
May 9, 2018 16:14:08   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
jimneotech wrote:
Did your lens have VR?


No, it's a Sigma 150-600 Sport - so it has OS, not VR.

Reply
May 9, 2018 16:18:12   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
FreddB wrote:
I was going to start by saying please correct me if I'm wrong, which is totally unnecessary on here. I wasn't aware that pixels had a weight factor. One's ability to shoot handheld depends on the weight of the equipment versus their hand/arm/upper body strength. Those are affected by our age and physical condition. So, it's either downsize the gear or up size the strength; save the pixel count for another discussion.


No, but the higher the pixel density, the higher the amount of recorded fine detail, and if you have a blur that is 1 plxel long on a 12 mp canera, that will be several pixels long on a 46 mp camera - so, the blur you won't see at 12 mp you definitely will see at 46 mp - regardless of the camera+lens weight, physical condition of the shooter, age, etc.

Pixel count is definitely part of this discussion. What gear do you use?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.