Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Will smart phone cameras replace DSLRs in the future?
Page <<first <prev 7 of 11 next> last>>
Apr 13, 2018 13:40:17   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
PhotonHog wrote:
Phones are for making phone calls. Cameras are for making images. Yes, most phones now have cameras, really an add on, that for some do rather well. It is VERY easy to just point and shoot with the phone; it is always right there. But that tiny sensor and third party add on lenses will NEVER approach the level of a real DSLR or even a good larger sensor point and shoot real camera. The sensor is the heart of any camera and still - bigger is better. Yes more mega pixels, some phones now boast over 10, can help but the quality of the image still comes first for real photography. So will smart phone cameras ever replace DSLRs? No for the serious photographer, never. Yes for the use who just needs an image now to send out for others to see.
Phones are for making phone calls. Cameras are fo... (show quote)


Never ever say “NEVER”. Or do you have the gift of seeing the future?

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 13:46:46   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
beerhunter13 wrote:
I have yet to see anyone photographing wildlife in the woods I frequent with a smart phone. At 15 below zero, taking your gloves off to take a photo might be a problem. ("Smart phone gloves" are almost useless in the cold.) Smart phones might be great for selfies but not so much for a moose on the run or a bird in flight at 300 meters.

If you want to take pictures, use a smart phone. If you want to make pictures, use a camera.

Phones may have their uses but for serious photography leave them in your top pocket.
I have yet to see anyone photographing wildlife in... (show quote)


Like I said: the person behind the camera is key. A talented photographer WILL tale a better picture than a snapshot shooter with a “real” camera. A photo that is a snapshot is still a snapshot, no matter how large the sensor.

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 13:47:46   #
PatrickG
 
I have been on the digest for awhile perusing the different topics. But when reading this one I decided it was time to register and reply. I am an avid amateur photographer and started with a Kodak Brownie and advanced to a Canon A1 carrying 6 primes circa. 1970's. I resisted going to digital for all the reasons I could find, but the first I purchased was a Canon G1, good camera but still had a significant shutter delay. Now I shoot a Canon 6D and carry many wonderful zooms.

Now to the topic, smart phone cameras! Yes, they take nice pictures, the technology in the background allows for artistic expression, but they are still pictures. Whereas DSLRs, mirror less cameras, and the likes capture photographs and photographer is the creator of such. Remember the root of the word photography - creating images with light. In order to created with light you need to be able to capture and mold light and that is the distinct advantage the camera possesses. A smartphone is only a pinhole camera on technology steroids, until a smart phone increase its aperture to match a camera body and fast lens it remains a pinhole camera. IMHO. Patrick

Reply
 
 
Apr 13, 2018 13:49:24   #
ToBoldlyGo Loc: London U.K.
 
PatrickG wrote:
I have been on the digest for awhile perusing the different topics. But when reading this one I decided it was time to register and reply. I am an avid amateur photographer and started with a Kodak Brownie and advanced to a Canon A1 carrying 6 primes circa. 1970's. I resisted going to digital for all the reasons I could find, but the first I purchased was a Canon G1, good camera but still had a significant shutter delay. Now I shoot a Canon 6D and carry many wonderful zooms.

Now to the topic, smart phone cameras! Yes, they take nice pictures, the technology in the background allows for artistic expression, but they are still pictures. Whereas DSLRs, mirror less cameras, and the likes capture photographs and photographer is the creator of such. Remember the root of the word photography - creating images with light. In order to created with light you need to be able to capture and mold light and that is the distinct advantage the camera possesses. A smartphone is only a pinhole camera on technology steroids, until a smart phone increase its aperture to match a camera body and fast lens it remains a pinhole camera. IMHO. Patrick
I have been on the digest for awhile perusing the ... (show quote)


I disagree. A smartphone is FAR more capable than a pinhole camera.

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 13:59:23   #
bittermelon
 
Maybe not replaced, but certainly phone cameras have greatly expanded what is considered photography. Lots more people who never would've taken photos before now do it, because they don't have to carry an extra camera. Selfies, which was not a thing before, is now a thing because of phone cameras.

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 14:02:10   #
FiddleMaker Loc: Merrimac, MA
 
traderjohn wrote:
I have never heard of these items. I'm sure they would take a much better picture than a cell phone. Who buys those cameras? Are they expensive?? The general population wouldn't buy one of those things. Their lives are always in flux. It's the moment. The cell phone and its ability to capture the moment fits the bill. The ability to take pictures with a cell phone has improved and will become better. The audience that receives the picture is not going to get their panties in an uproar over ISO, composition, focal length or pixel count. They will not anguish over the EXIF data or PS, LR and whatever else is in vogue.
I have never heard of these items. I'm sure they w... (show quote)

Both Sinar and Deardorff cameras are classified as "view" cameras and use film - either black & white or color based negative film. The term 4 x 5 means that the actual negative film measures 4 inches by 5 inches. The same for an 8 by 10 camera where the actual film measures 8 inches by 10 inches. These are Huge film negatives and can only be processed in a photographic darkroom. Most full-frame digital cameras today have a sensor measuring roughly 0.8 inches by 1.4 inches or 24mm by 36mm.

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 14:27:57   #
Burtzy Loc: Bronx N.Y. & Simi Valley, CA
 
PhotoFem wrote:
I see people using iphones, smart phones and now even with new lens attachments to take photos of everyday life...and even nature. Perhaps, this is because they can instantaneously post their images on Facebook and Instagram. Instagram even has rudimentary tools to improve bad images...or, even alter their original look.
Any thoughts on this?

Thanks,
Jen
Camera phones are fine for certain things, but in bright sunlight, there is no substitute for an eye-level finder, aside from a focusing hood on an 8X10 view camera.

Reply
 
 
Apr 13, 2018 14:38:21   #
aellman Loc: Boston MA
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
New cell phones have remarkably great cameras that will satisfy the needs of many/most serious picture takers.


I would have agreed with you except for the word "serious." It suggests a commitment to photography that requires creative controls that phones don't have.

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 14:51:46   #
Dr.Nikon Loc: Honolulu Hawaii
 
Wow ..., 3080 + and counting ...this article hit a raw nerve .., for sure ...a moment captured be it a brownie . cell phone ., bridge .., mirrorless DX .. FX .., 8X10 billows .on and on is still a picture .. a snap shot in time ... the market and the trends of the world present and future .., drive the economic engine here which is king ..

Some of my IPHONE Shots .. are better than 50% of all the HOGG shots I have seen ...and some of my Note 8 shots blow away same ...both cell phones of the five I now use were over $1,000 a piece .., do they replace my D810 and my newly acquired D850 ..., not in a million years ...I carry both those $1,000 cell phones wherever I go ...however I use only the Note 8 now for its photo superiority over the Ipone ...,

If I get a great shot of a landscape or Architecture with my cell phone as I just happen to be there at a unplanned location .. I will return with my DSLR to recapture the shot in detail ..

Yes my Note 8 shoots in RAW and has focus points and manual focus and ISO and what balance and 6 other adjustments on the fly and has to be learned to use it properly .., but it will never replace my D810 or D850 .....

Let everyone use what ever they want ... to shoot what ever they want .. who gives a rip ...a real photographer knows that the most important shot is the one captured at a particular moment in time that tells a story or catches an event happening .. Jack Ruby shooting Lee Harvey O ... the Hindenburg exploding ...or the bride maid of honor catching the bouquet ...whatever ...., it doesnt matter what camera or cell phone was used to capture the ‘MOMENT” ..

Real photographers know what real photos are and how to take them and what equipment to use .., my cell phone takes better pictures than yours .. or >.I can outshoot you and Your DSLR/SLR ..pls give me a break ....

Have fun shooting pictures with whatever you have at the time or can afford ...its like discussing politics or religion ... there is no real answer ., just arguments and disagreements ....

I just attached a few cell phone shots to make a point 2) is a IPHONE 6plus ..1) Note 8

Note 8
Note 8...
(Download)

IPHONE
IPHONE...
(Download)

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 15:05:15   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
Before cell phones, most Americans did not own any DSLRs or film SLRs. And no intentions of owning one today. Maybe they owned a pocket digital camera or a Kodak film Instamatic. When the smartphone or iPhones came about, not only did you have a phone, but a camera that was decent, and many apps with games to play. I don't know anyone today who does not have a smartphone. Teenagers to Seniors. Now, they have telephoto attachments to hook up to these Smartphones. Not, my cup of tea. I'll stick with my DSLR, Bridge and pocket cameras for what they are worth to me. Now.

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 15:24:32   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
bittermelon wrote:
Maybe not replaced, but certainly phone cameras have greatly expanded what is considered photography. Lots more people who never would've taken photos before now do it, because they don't have to carry an extra camera. Selfies, which was not a thing before, is now a thing because of phone cameras.


Selfies aren't new - here's one I did back in the '70s, with a hand held flash:



Reply
 
 
Apr 13, 2018 15:41:36   #
bittermelon
 
Of course it's not new. But it was not a "thing" in the last century. I'll bet it was not a word in the dictionary until phone cameras became popular.

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 15:45:28   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
bittermelon wrote:
Of course it's not new. But it was not a "thing" in the last century. I'll bet it was not a word in the dictionary until phone cameras became popular.


It's slang for "self portrait", which has always been a "thing".

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 16:50:56   #
chrisg-optical Loc: New York, NY
 
Smart phones are great for quick snaps and family pics (convenience) and have basically wiped out the P&S cameras, but not the DSLR....mirrorless FF is the new successor for serious photography going forward, but the DSLR will continue for some time.

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 18:04:40   #
traderjohn Loc: New York City
 
FiddleMaker wrote:
Both Sinar and Deardorff cameras are classified as "view" cameras and use film - either black & white or color based negative film. The term 4 x 5 means that the actual negative film measures 4 inches by 5 inches. The same for an 8 by 10 camera where the actual film measures 8 inches by 10 inches. These are Huge film negatives and can only be processed in a photographic darkroom. Most full-frame digital cameras today have a sensor measuring roughly 0.8 inches by 1.4 inches or 24mm by 36mm.
Both Sinar and Deardorff cameras are classified as... (show quote)


Thanks for your response. Good to know.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.