Quinn 4 wrote:
In the news this morning is about the two top jet fight the US had can't not communicate with each other. The great America military industrial complex at work. Spend another billon dollars to fix it.
But they both can communicate with the ground and with an orbiting E3. And the two generally aren't on missions together. And wouldn't the pilots of each be warned (since they aren't on missions together) that they were in each other's operational areas? Yes, it is inconvenient but not a deal killer. Heck, we had platoons that couldn't communicate with each other in Vietnam. And that's way more serious because we DID have to operate in the same areas. But, we worked it out.
duane klipping wrote:
It is a difficult read due to grammar and structure of the op. Wish people would proofread before posting.
Terrible grammar and no proof read.
Quinn 4 wrote:
In the news this morning is about the two top jet fight the US had can't not communicate with each other. The great America military industrial complex at work. Spend another billion dollars to fix it.
A billion will cover the initial stages of setting up the committee and deciding on a location - Bahamas, Switzerland, Dubai - to discuss the problem. "Fix it"? You're an optimist.
Quinn 4 wrote:
In the news this morning is about the two top jet fight the US had can't not communicate with each other. The great America military industrial complex at work. Spend another billon dollars to fix it.
And if you say they can't not communicate with each other then they must be communicating.
duane klipping wrote:
It is a difficult read due to grammar and structure of the op. Wish people would proofread before posting.
Couldn't agree more. It is so rampant, it's ridiculous. Makes reading anything a lot less smooth.
big-guy
Loc: Peterborough Ontario Canada
Another fine gradiate of the skool of gooder english.
sr71
Loc: In Col. Juan Seguin Land
Well that is what you get when you get air farce flag officers that set the design parameters.
duane klipping wrote:
It is a difficult read due to grammar and structure of the op. Wish people would proofread before posting.
It doesn't do any good for someone who doesn't know proper grammar and spelling to proofread what they write.
Nothing on TV or in the newspapers in South Africa, so I guess unless youโre in the US you ainโt going to know what this is about.
1Feathercrest wrote:
correction: Wish I knew what you are (you're) talking about. It also looks like you are (you're) having a hard time communicating.
'Your" is a possessive as in: Your grammar is atrocious.
And your correction is idiotic.
usken65: Who the jackass that buy a plane for $30,000,000 that is not working right?
1Feathercrest: I think I do ok for a person who had a heart attack and stoke at the same time a few years back. Yes, at time ideas in my brain get mix up. But I can live with it. Can you?
Tough crowd. ๐๐๐
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.