Jaackil wrote:
Not really at all. There are no parallels nothing tangential at all other than a camera and a team. This is not a case of a person who can not afford the images. The coach shouldn’t have to pay for this image because the woman won’t. This is an entitled woman who thinks she is entitled to the image. But please feel free to draw this tangential lines for me. You did go off in a tangent though telling your own story which I still fail to see how it addresses the original question. The question was How To Respond. I do not see a response at all. You told a nice story about what you did but you did not answer the question.
Not really at all. There are no parallels nothing ... (
show quote)
Then you have not learned anything?
What answer were you looking for? Obviously all the attempts have been falling short. 13 pages!
Stephan G wrote:
Then you have not learned anything?
What answer were you looking for? Obviously all the attempts have been falling short. 13 pages!
Actually I have gotten several very good answers from people who actually read the original post,and yours, which I see no relevance to the question other than to blow your own horn. Congratulation you took film pictures and sold them for $15 and the coach took care of the ones who couldn’t afford them. Bravo!
Anything I charge for I often say the repair, photo, whatever was free but my time, experience and expertise will cost you $xxx. This way she is NOT paying for a photo of her son and makes her argument mute.
But I do like the idea of placing a copyright stamp across the middle with your business name, email and $15 price for reproductions, then send free to her.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.