Thank You for your Service, Senator Duckworth
Feb 6, 2018 07:21:49 #
Feb 7, 2018 06:10:26 #
richosob
Loc: Lambertville, MI
Banker0715 wrote:
She isn't a coward like president bone spur!
And she puts the rights of i*****l i*******ts above those of American citizens, and you have no problem with that, do you.
Feb 7, 2018 06:15:56 #
My problem is with trump who is a coward. Too scared to serve, pathetic.
Feb 7, 2018 08:50:20 #
richosob wrote:
And she puts the rights of i*****l i*******ts above those of American citizens, and you have no problem with that, do you.
And how does she put them above? What rights will they have that you do not?
Feb 7, 2018 09:01:44 #
mjmoore17 wrote:
And how does she put them above? What rights will they have that you do not?
The right to break the law?
Feb 7, 2018 09:46:26 #
You are being foolish. They followed the instructions given to them. If the instructions were unconstitutional, then that is on the lawmakers. If you mean that when their parents carried them across the border as children, the children did that with the intent to break the law, you are delusional.
Feb 7, 2018 11:10:55 #
richosob wrote:
And she puts the rights of i*****l i*******ts above those of American citizens, and you have no problem with that, do you.
😎
Feb 7, 2018 11:43:05 #
mjmoore17 wrote:
You are being foolish. They followed the instructions given to them. If the instructions were unconstitutional, then that is on the lawmakers. If you mean that when their parents carried them across the border as children, the children did that with the intent to break the law, you are delusional.
If they are here illegally, they are breaking the law, there is really no rational argument which alters that FACT.
Feb 7, 2018 12:23:35 #
There is a legal point of ' extenuating circumstances'
WNYShooter wrote:
If they are here illegally, they are breaking the law, there is really no rational argument which alters that FACT.
Feb 7, 2018 13:05:39 #
Harvey wrote:
There is a legal point of ' extenuating circumstances'
Sure, maybe applicable in individual cases, but certainly not across the whole spectrum of the i*****l i*******t situation.
Feb 7, 2018 14:11:48 #
Yes - these have to be checked on an individual case -
WNYShooter wrote:
Sure, maybe applicable in individual cases, but certainly not across the whole spectrum of the i*****l i*******t situation.
Feb 7, 2018 18:58:13 #
richosob wrote:
And she puts the rights of i*****l i*******ts above those of American citizens, and you have no problem with that, do you.
If it gets your goat, I have NO problems with that!!!
I agree about the Buttspurs, hard to walk with Buttspurs!!!
SS
Feb 7, 2018 19:07:32 #
WNYShooter wrote:
If they are here illegally, they are breaking the law, there is really no rational argument which alters that FACT.
The REAL FACT is that they are here and no amount of you s**tting in your dinner plate is gonna make them go away.
And no amount of forced PUTOS laws and signed EO’s will make them go away! You can stutter, stutter, stutter and drool on yourself till your tongue is RAW and they will still be here.
So get used to it.
Proper laws will make it easier on i***ts like you!!! I know that it feels different in your conservative vacuum!!! LoL
SS
Feb 7, 2018 21:08:11 #
WNYShooter wrote:
If they are here illegally, they are breaking the law, there is really no rational argument which alters that FACT.
If they followed the current law, how are they illegal? You can change the law like Cadet Bone Spurs to make them illegal but currently, they are legal.
Feb 7, 2018 21:39:26 #
mjmoore17 wrote:
If they followed the current law, how are they illegal? You can change the law like Cadet Bone Spurs to make them illegal but currently, they are legal.
They aren’t following the current law......it was a p**********l edict which, so far, has NOT been upheld in the court system.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.