Rongnongno wrote:
If you are like me, once I see it I cannot but only see it...
The result is that it is a good try but a miss.
Wouldn't it be possible to process 25% at a time and then group those 4 files for a final out put?
Rich1939 wrote:
Wouldn't it be possible to process 25% at a time and then group those 4 files for a final out put?
I tried several methods w/o success at the time.
Gene51
Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
SusanFromVermont wrote:
I can understand multiple shots and multiple rows, but why so MANY? I have to wonder how you can sort them all out. Or does the computer do that for you......
I have taken multiple photos but nowhere near that many, and had trouble keeping them straight! Even with putting a signal frame in there at the beginning and end - maybe I should have also put one between rows!
Regardless of all the "flaws" you describe, it looks like a pretty Vermont scene. Looking forward to seeing the final result. Where in Vermont were you? This type of scene could be just about anywhere!
Susan
I can understand multiple shots and multiple rows,... (
show quote)
Susan, the software will find match points from overlapping images. The don't have to be nice and neat and orderly.
This illustrates the point:
https://petapixel.com/2016/10/27/stitching-panorama-forget-wide-angle-lens-home/
Thanks Gene! Does this mean the images can be out of order, and either vertical or horizontal, and the program will sort them out? Do you have one you prefer - LR, PS?
Susan
SusanFromVermont wrote:
Thanks Gene! Does this mean the images can be out of order, and either vertical or horizontal, and the program will sort them out? Do you have one you prefer - LR, PS?
Susan
Vertical and horizontal - Depends on the program. PS CC and ACR spit on that. ICE does not care.
In order? Also depends.
Capture orientation and ordering depends on the program used.
Also.. PS CC just does not save large pixel bitmap files and creates limitations in size. I am running into that at the moment.
Rongnongno wrote:
Vertical and horizontal - Depends on the program. PS CC and ACR spit on that. ICE does not care.
In order? Also depends.
Capture orientation and ordering depends on the program used.
Also.. PS CC just does not save large pixel bitmap files and creates limitations in size. I am running into that at the moment.
Are you saying that PS CC is no good to use? I do not use ACR, except as LR, and I do not know what ICE means. Just curious as to what program will do the job best!
SusanFromVermont wrote:
Are you saying that PS CC is no good to use? I do not use ACR, except as LR, and I do not know what ICE means. Just curious as to what program will do the job best!
I am saying if you have a large panorama PS CC and ACR will bail on you. This is likely what went one when PS CC ACR refused to create the panorama (see above post).
You can important large bitmap images (as I did) but you cannot export the result if you pass PS CC bitmap limits. I am still in shock here. The only way around it is to create humongous HTML file using an incredible amount of tiles (+80k) using either 'Zoomify' or 'Google tile cutter' as a script.
ICE produces anything with a kitchen sink thrown at it compared to PS CC. I am now resorting to edit all my file used in the panorama (ACR, Sync) and then throw them at ICE to deal with. Then I can export onto a bitmap format w/o difficulties from ICE.
I found other limitations in PS CC but every-time, like with a panorama, PS CC is not made to deal with these extreme cases.
In the end, to create a gigantic panorama, one must use a specialized versatile software. ICE has limitations other dedicated software do not have but is much less finicky.
(Added after initial post)
ICE
Rongnongno wrote:
I am saying if you have a large panorama PS CC and ACR will bail on you. This is likely what went one when PS CC ACR refused to create the panorama (see above post).
You can important large bitmap images (as I did) but you cannot export the result if you pass PS CC bitmap limits. I am still in shock here. The only way around it is to create humongous HTML file using an incredible amount of tiles (+80k) using either 'Zoomify' or 'Google tile cutter' as a script.
ICE produces anything with a kitchen sink thrown at it compared to PS CC. I am now resorting to edit all my file used in the panorama (ACR, Sync) and then throw them at ICE to deal with. Then I can export onto a bitmap format w/o difficulties from ICE.
I found other limitations in PS CC but every-time, like with a panorama, PS CC is not made to deal with these extreme cases.
In the end, to create a gigantic panorama, one must use a specialized versatile software. ICE has limitations other dedicated software do not have but is much less finicky.
(Added after initial post)
ICEI am saying if you have a large panorama PS CC and... (
show quote)
I still do not know what ICE is!
Click on the link at the bottom of my last post.
I use Autostitch. It does not care what order the photos are given to it, and it can work with a mix of portrait and landscape photos as long as "up" is the same for all of them. (It will also rotate them for you if "up" isn't at the top.) I only do JPEG and it's possible that Autostitch only works with that type. I have no data on how big a panorama is possible, but I've made some that were more than 16,000 x 3500 pixels.
Day 3 pano 1 hires.jpg by
David Casteel, on Flickr
(That blurry white thing at the left is not a failed merge--it looks like that in the single image.)
Banff pano 2.jpg by
David Casteel, on Flickr
Rongnongno wrote:
I am saying if you have a large panorama PS CC and ACR will bail on you. This is likely what went one when PS CC ACR refused to create the panorama (see above post).
You can important large bitmap images (as I did) but you cannot export the result if you pass PS CC bitmap limits. I am still in shock here. The only way around it is to create humongous HTML file using an incredible amount of tiles (+80k) using either 'Zoomify' or 'Google tile cutter' as a script.
ICE produces anything with a kitchen sink thrown at it compared to PS CC. I am now resorting to edit all my file used in the panorama (ACR, Sync) and then throw them at ICE to deal with. Then I can export onto a bitmap format w/o difficulties from ICE.
I found other limitations in PS CC but every-time, like with a panorama, PS CC is not made to deal with these extreme cases.
In the end, to create a gigantic panorama, one must use a specialized versatile software. ICE has limitations other dedicated software do not have but is much less finicky.
(Added after initial post)
ICEI am saying if you have a large panorama PS CC and... (
show quote)
Thank you. I found the link!
David, it would best that we do not post our own images into someone else's thread. You should have posted these two good images into one of your thread. Posting a link to it would have worked much better.
By the way, since you use autostich, can you post, in a new thread, what you think of it, good, awkward and no so good? Something similar to the
ICE thread?
Thank you.
Rongnongno wrote:
David, it would best that we do not post our own images into someone else's thread. You should have posted these two good images into one of your thread. Posting a link to it would have worked much better.
By the way, since you use autostich, can you post, in a new thread, what you think of it, good, awkward and no so good? Something similar to the
ICE thread?
Thank you.
Point noted. The images I posted were an attempt to answer the question posted by the OP. Posting the images in a different thread loses the connection between the question and the answer. In the future I'll just post a link when an image is needed.
David in Dallas wrote:
Point noted. The images I posted were an attempt to answer the question posted by the OP. Posting the images in a different thread loses the connection between the question and the answer. In the future I'll just post a link when an image is needed.
That is ok. What I regret is that I cannot list them as is.
Can you create a topic?
Rongnongno wrote:
That is ok. What I regret is that I cannot list them as is.
Can you create a topic?
Yes, I can post topics. I assume you are asking if I can post one about Autostitch? I'm not an expert (Autostitch has a lot of parameters that can be altered, but there are only a couple that I even dare to change).
David in Dallas wrote:
Yes, I can post topics. I assume you are asking if I can post one about Autostitch? I'm not an expert (Autostitch has a lot of parameters that can be altered, but there are only a couple that I even dare to change).
That too. I have been testing is since you mentioned it and
taking notes... I am not finished so....
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.