Nikon shutter count
Jul 11, 2012 07:10:58 #
Rwe.My avater. Yes, it's a Lancaster.
Lots of folk suggest cqamerashuutercount.com. but it just blacks out my screen. But thanks for all the replies
Lots of folk suggest cqamerashuutercount.com. but it just blacks out my screen. But thanks for all the replies
Jul 11, 2012 08:39:37 #
viscountdriver wrote:
How do I get a shuuter count on my Nikon D3100? I found a web site but all it did was to black out my screen.
There is a free software for your computer called PIE (picture information extractor). Very easy to use. Open the app, browse for a pic, either off your card reader or where ever you have the pic stored, open the pic. The app will give you all the meta-data for the pic, including the shutter count, if that info is available for the camera you are using. Some of the older Nikon's (the 5000 series, for example) doesn't imbed that info when the pic is taken.
Jul 11, 2012 08:47:21 #
nikon_jon wrote:
quote=viscountdriver How do I get a shuuter count... (show quote)
Beg to differ re D5000 Sir: if you follow the link on my previous post in this thread, you will see the count is in the exif ?
Jul 11, 2012 09:20:14 #
steve_icbinb wrote:
quote=nikon_jon quote=viscountdriver How do I ge... (show quote)
I was not referring to the D5000. There is an older series Nikon digitals that were not dslr's. They were numbered 5000 and 5400 without the D preceding the number. They were more in the genre of what we refer to these days as 'bridge cameras'.
Jul 11, 2012 12:28:17 #
nikon_jon wrote:
I was not referring to the D5000. There is an older series Nikon digitals that were not dslr's. They were numbered 5000 and 5400 without the D preceding the number. They were more in the genre of what we refer to these days as 'bridge cameras'.
I was not referring to the D5000. There is an older series Nikon digitals that were not dslr's. They were numbered 5000 and 5400 without the D preceding the number. They were more in the genre of what we refer to these days as 'bridge cameras'.
I stand corrected and beg your pardon
I made a wrong assumption as the OP was talking about a D series camera.
Mea Culpa.
steve
Jul 11, 2012 16:00:11 #
Pardon begging not necessary. I occasionally open my mouth and get my foot in all the way up past the ankle.
Actually, I think the 5000 and 5400 were before Nikon's dslr days. I believe the D50 was their first dslr and the 5000 series predates that.....I think. I actually own a 5400. It has a 5 megapixel sensor, does an adequate job, but I would take any Fuji bridge camera over it, hands down, any day of the week. There is a pretty good market for the 5000 series. Some people buy them and convert them to infrared cameras.
Actually, I think the 5000 and 5400 were before Nikon's dslr days. I believe the D50 was their first dslr and the 5000 series predates that.....I think. I actually own a 5400. It has a 5 megapixel sensor, does an adequate job, but I would take any Fuji bridge camera over it, hands down, any day of the week. There is a pretty good market for the 5000 series. Some people buy them and convert them to infrared cameras.
Jul 29, 2012 17:37:09 #
I thought it might be s Shackleton. What did you get by way of a reply to your question?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.