Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Which full frame camera, DSLR or Mirrorless?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
Jan 11, 2018 12:50:33   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
MikeMc wrote:
I'm getting back into hobby photography and shopping for a new camera. I mostly shoot landscape, sunsets, moonshots, family pictures, etc. No sports or fast moving subjects. I don't need high frames/sec. But I do want the highest image quality I can get in my price range. I'm considering a Nikon D750, Cannon EOS D6, Sony mirrorless (their model #'s totally confuse me but either a 7Rll or one of their other full frame models) I bought a Sony RX100V but returned it because the pictures I took were not any better than my I phone for those particular landscape pictures, plus it just seemed to tiny.
I appreciate any inputs about which ones I should consider and DSLR vs Mirrorless. Thanks
I'm getting back into hobby photography and shoppi... (show quote)


I have said this often. I use a Canon 80D and have an investment in equipment. If I were starting from zip, I would go mirrorless. The tech is just that good and the lens choices are expanding rapidly.

Reply
Jan 11, 2018 13:05:55   #
DrJ
 
Gene51: Real nice resolution on Tabby and the bird he would like to catch. Impressive that this could be done with the superzoom. Thanks, DrJ

Reply
Jan 11, 2018 13:11:39   #
bwana Loc: Bergen, Alberta, Canada
 
MikeMc wrote:
I'm getting back into hobby photography and shopping for a new camera. I mostly shoot landscape, sunsets, moonshots, family pictures, etc. No sports or fast moving subjects. I don't need high frames/sec. But I do want the highest image quality I can get in my price range. I'm considering a Nikon D750, Cannon EOS D6, Sony mirrorless (their model #'s totally confuse me but either a 7Rll or one of their other full frame models) I bought a Sony RX100V but returned it because the pictures I took were not any better than my I phone for those particular landscape pictures, plus it just seemed to tiny.
I appreciate any inputs about which ones I should consider and DSLR vs Mirrorless. Thanks
I'm getting back into hobby photography and shoppi... (show quote)

I currently have a Sony A7S, A7 II and A7R II, 12, 24 and 42MP, respectively. The A7(Sensitvity) is one of the best low light cameras available. The A7(Resolution) II is the resolution master. And the A7 II is simply a great general purpose camera. You can't go too wrong with any of the A7 series cameras.

I also use a RX10 III with its excellent 24-600mm lens. It has rapidly turned into my goto camera for almost any situation.

bwa

Reply
 
 
Jan 11, 2018 13:26:40   #
dmsM43
 
You haven't mentioned whether you want to make large prints or just want to show your work on the internet. If you are going for large prints then you will want something like the Sony A7r ii, or the Nikon D850, or the Canon 5DS R. On the other hand, if you are only going to display your images on the web or on an HDR TV, a cell phone will do, or any crop sensor camera.

Reply
Jan 11, 2018 13:31:32   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
dmsM43 wrote:
You haven't mentioned whether you want to make large prints or just want to show your work on the internet. If you are going for large prints then you will want something like the Sony A7r ii, or the Nikon D850, or the Canon 5DS R. On the other hand, if you are only going to display your images on the web or on an HDR TV, a cell phone will do, or any crop sensor camera.


The OP did ask about "full frame" options. A cell phone is not in that category.

Reply
Jan 11, 2018 14:45:53   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
You'd better read Rongnongno's thread about the misuse of the term Full Frame. However, now that "Full Frame" is in the common lexicography as referring to 24x3 mm sensors, I would think that his objection is moot.

Reply
Jan 11, 2018 15:10:00   #
sirlensalot Loc: Arizona
 
Any of the choices you posted would serve you well. My opinion: Sony for technology, MP, and EVF. Nikon for DR - as good as any DSLR for all around us. Canon for AF and colors. Pro quality lenses for all are not cheap. For landscapes would be looking at a quality travel tripod and maybe a UWA manual focus lens from Samyang/Rokinon for astro and landscape shots.
I would be looking for best DR for your intended use.

Reply
 
 
Jan 11, 2018 17:01:59   #
Dennis833 Loc: Australia
 
The Sony A7R11 is a great camera for landscapes. When the best image quality and greatest dynamic range are important.

Reply
Jan 11, 2018 17:28:49   #
CatherineWM
 
copladocus wrote:
I have the Canon 6D MkII and love it. The technowags will steer you away from it because it has less than optimal dynamic range - something I have yet to discern. The bad press it got is to your advantage as the price has dropped on them and providers are now including the otherwise optional battery grip as a part of the deal. It will be heavy, especially with the battery grip, so beware.

I find that the 6D does great for my level of expertise and works well in my professional work (off figure products). I can control it via my smartphone and I love the articulated touch screen. If you go that route I suggest the 24-105L lens and you will have a set up that will take you years to outgrow.
I have the Canon 6D MkII and love it. The technowa... (show quote)


So excited to hear from someone who uses the Canon 6D. I've been thinking about upgrading from my Canon 7d, which I love, but would like a full frame camera. I've heard the newest 6D has some features the 5D doesn't so wondering why the huge price difference? What are your favorite things about the 6D MkII? Just curious. Thanks--Cathy

Reply
Jan 11, 2018 22:00:05   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
MikeMc wrote:
I'm getting back into hobby photography and shopping for a new camera. I mostly shoot landscape, sunsets, moonshots, family pictures, etc. No sports or fast moving subjects. I don't need high frames/sec. But I do want the highest image quality I can get in my price range. I'm considering a Nikon D750, Cannon EOS D6, Sony mirrorless (their model #'s totally confuse me but either a 7Rll or one of their other full frame models) I bought a Sony RX100V but returned it because the pictures I took were not any better than my I phone for those particular landscape pictures, plus it just seemed to tiny.
I appreciate any inputs about which ones I should consider and DSLR vs Mirrorless. Thanks
I'm getting back into hobby photography and shoppi... (show quote)


If you want ultimate quality of the current crop the Sony A7RIII beats all by a good margin. Don't know the budget though but it will be state of the art much longer than the II model.
If money is the reason then the A7RII would be the best choice of those mentioned by a good margin.

Reply
Jan 11, 2018 22:04:53   #
Kuzano
 
CO wrote:
From now on, I'm only going to purchase cameras that don't have an anti-aliasing filter in front of the sensor. Cameras that I own and have rented that don't have an anti-aliasing filter have an edge in sharpness. When I purchased my D500 (no AA filter), I did comparison shots with a D750 (has AA filter). The images were processed the same way for consistency. The photos from the D500 were clearly sharper. I've noticed the difference with other cameras also.

As far as Nikon goes I would recommend looking at these models: D7200, D7500, D500, D810, D850.

You might want to rent both DSLR and mirrorless cameras. LensRentals.com is great place to rent. I've rented from them numerous times.
From now on, I'm only going to purchase cameras th... (show quote)


This is a superb distinction overlooked by SO MANY! I have not purchased an AA filtered, low pass filtered camera of any sort since Olympus began tweaking the low pass filter and ultimately removing same. This began on their 4/3 EPL1 in 2006, and I have benefitted noticeably in increased image sharpness from all camera's purchased hence without AA/low pass filtering.

As with some other features Canon seems to be a holdout in this area, still using sharpness blurring AA and low pass filters. That plus no serious movement in Mirrorless has stricken Canon from my list of desirable manufacturers.

Reply
 
 
Jan 11, 2018 22:13:37   #
gwilliams6
 
tdekany wrote:
Sony would be my choice and I don’t think anyone would dispute that the A7rII produces the highest image quality out of the 3 choices. GL with your choice.

PS: As a mirrorless user, I could never ever go back to an OVF. Seeing what my exposer will look like is priceless.


I second tdekany. I also switched from a longtime user of top-end DSLRs (Nikon and Canon) to Sony Mirrorless a year ago and would never go back . A7R2s can be had for great prices now (used and new) now that the A7R3 is out. The A7R2 is a great camera, I had one and loved it. I recently upgraded to the A7R3, but that is no knock on the quite exquisite A7R2. I am a pro shooter of decades, but still take photos around the world for the pleasure of the image. Sony mirrorless cameras have great image quality and innovation. Yes if your budget can bear it, the A7R3 is your best choice. But you will find great deals now on new and used A7R2s.

Reply
Jan 11, 2018 22:33:15   #
copladocus
 
CatherineWM wrote:
So excited to hear from someone who uses the Canon 6D. I've been thinking about upgrading from my Canon 7d, which I love, but would like a full frame camera. I've heard the newest 6D has some features the 5D doesn't so wondering why the huge price difference? What are your favorite things about the 6D MkII? Just curious. Thanks--Cathy


Hi Cathy. I like the articulated touch screen and the option to set it up and control the camera remotely for taking candid shots and hands-off, no shake shots using my phone. The photos are fantastic as is the step up to full frame. I have also made myself a promise to only buy L series lenses for it. The 24-105L lens is the icing on the cake. Get one, you will not be disappointed.

Reply
Jan 11, 2018 23:14:48   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
MikeMc wrote:
I'm getting back into hobby photography and shopping for a new camera. I mostly shoot landscape, sunsets, moonshots, family pictures, etc. No sports or fast moving subjects. I don't need high frames/sec. But I do want the highest image quality I can get in my price range. I'm considering a Nikon D750, Cannon EOS D6, Sony mirrorless (their model #'s totally confuse me but either a 7Rll or one of their other full frame models) I bought a Sony RX100V but returned it because the pictures I took were not any better than my I phone for those particular landscape pictures, plus it just seemed to tiny.
I appreciate any inputs about which ones I should consider and DSLR vs Mirrorless. Thanks
I'm getting back into hobby photography and shoppi... (show quote)


Sony mirrorless is the future ......

Reply
Jan 11, 2018 23:20:27   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
imagemeister wrote:
Sony mirrorless is the future ......


That's a bold quote even for you! Apparently Nikon isn't convinced: http://nikonrumors.com/ , neither is Canon: http://www.canonrumors.com/

I guess "we'll see"!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.