Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
carrots
Dec 25, 2017 17:48:51 #
Dec 25, 2017 17:52:35 #
buckwheat wrote:
Did admin remove pego99's "carrot photo"?
May have was sorta controversial. Someone may have reported it.
Dec 25, 2017 17:55:30 #
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Dec 25, 2017 18:42:36 #
Dec 25, 2017 18:56:00 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
Damn, I missed it.
Well they could have been taped to the side of the hip. If that helps the visual. Was a side shot.
Dec 26, 2017 02:36:37 #
Taping is a nice idea, but I can't get the mage of them placed in orfices put of my mind. I think whoever placed them should be required to eat them immediately as they were removed.
Dec 26, 2017 02:39:35 #
Bill P wrote:
Taping is a nice idea, but I can't get the mage of them placed in orfices put of my mind. I think whoever placed them should be required to eat them immediately as they were removed.
He may have
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
Dec 26, 2017 11:25:08 #
Probably did remove it. When I first saw it I thought "porn" was written all over it. This is NOT a porn section, it's a section for photographic art of nudes.
Dec 26, 2017 17:42:52 #
I saw it soon after it was posted. It was degrading to the model and totally devoid of artistic merit. I am certain the two carrots were not taped. Prior contributions by this UHH member we’re very controversial. I didn’t drop a dime on “Pego” but I decided I’ll not open any of his future posts.
Dec 31, 2017 10:56:05 #
Can someone point me to the rules specifying what IS and IS NOT allowed in this forum, specifically regarding "porn"? I wasn't aware the definition was so precisely defined, and don't want to violate the rules in my posts and have them removed.
Dec 31, 2017 11:06:14 #
Thurber Mingus wrote:
Can someone point me to the rules specifying what IS and IS NOT allowed in this forum, specifically regarding "porn"? I wasn't aware the definition was so precisely defined, and don't want to violate the rules in my posts and have them removed.
Common sense.
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Dec 31, 2017 11:31:29 #
Dec 31, 2017 12:43:20 #
Thurber Mingus wrote:
Wow, that's just about the answer I expected.
Well, did you see the photo in question? If so, what are your thoughts as to appropriateness for this forum?
Dec 31, 2017 13:39:49 #
I did see it, which led to my question. While it wasn't necessarily MY thing, I haven't seen anything about exactly what IS or IS NOT appropriate for this forum. There were no exposed genitalia, obviously there was a suggestion of penetration but it was implied, not visible.
Since I didn't have anything constructive to say, I chose to just move along without commenting, unlike several others. I've seen far more explicit pictures in my short time on this forum, so I was just trying to clarify the rules, since there doesn't seem to be any discussion or explanation for the thread's removal.
Obviously I'm in the minority on this site, and I'm glad to have the discussion with all of you, but I DO think the rules should be clearly stated for those who choose to post images.
Happy New Year!!
The notion that some members seem to be the sole arbiters of whether a photo is "porn" or not also bothers me, similar to the famous "I know it when I see it" statement by a Supreme Court Justice. I don't have a real opinion on whether or not that photo was appropriate for this forum (especially since it seems to be "unstated"), or whether or not it was pornographic, but even if I did, I'd just hit the back arrow on my browser and move along to another thread if I didn't care for it.
Since I didn't have anything constructive to say, I chose to just move along without commenting, unlike several others. I've seen far more explicit pictures in my short time on this forum, so I was just trying to clarify the rules, since there doesn't seem to be any discussion or explanation for the thread's removal.
Obviously I'm in the minority on this site, and I'm glad to have the discussion with all of you, but I DO think the rules should be clearly stated for those who choose to post images.
Happy New Year!!
The notion that some members seem to be the sole arbiters of whether a photo is "porn" or not also bothers me, similar to the famous "I know it when I see it" statement by a Supreme Court Justice. I don't have a real opinion on whether or not that photo was appropriate for this forum (especially since it seems to be "unstated"), or whether or not it was pornographic, but even if I did, I'd just hit the back arrow on my browser and move along to another thread if I didn't care for it.
Dec 31, 2017 13:46:45 #
Thurber Mingus wrote:
I did see it, which led to my question. While it ... (show quote)
Apperantly one didn't approve of it.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.