Enigmas
Dec 12, 2017 12:16:39 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
thom w wrote:
You are calling Jones a "Clansman"? Where/how did you get that?
He said the choice was between a perv and a Clansman. I have no problem seeing Moore in a hood, but he was either calling Jones a perv or a Clansman, and offered no evidence for either.
Dec 12, 2017 12:17:58 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
hondo812 wrote:
Wait! You're leaving us? Woot woot!
If the attic he described exists, in a heartbeat.
Dec 12, 2017 12:18:52 #
Dec 12, 2017 16:17:50 #
thom w wrote:
I don't know what "attic" you were just describing but it sounds like somewhere I'd like to visit if you have any details.
LoL
No good news for you about an attic utopia...I was just letting a little smartass out for a run!
Dec 12, 2017 19:48:30 #
Dec 12, 2017 21:53:56 #
DIRTY HARRY wrote:
AND THE DEMOCRATS THAT HAVE ALREADY RESIGNED WERE CHARGED WITH WHAT? YOU HAVE A PRESIDENT THAT ADMITTED DOING SEXUAL ASSAULTS ON TAPE AND YOU STILL ELECTED HIM... I GUESS IF YOUR A RICH REDUMBLICAN YOU CAN DO WH**EVER YOU WANT.... HES RIGHT, JUST GRAB THEM BY THE ...... MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.
Moron.
Dec 12, 2017 21:54:54 #
Frank T wrote:
In New York Weiner is doing time for sending a dick pick. Warren hasn't committed any heinous acts, nor has Schumer. In Alabama Roy Moore is running for Senator after molesting a child.
There is no equivalency. The senior Republican Senator from Alabama came out against Roy Moore.
A v**e for Moore is a v**e to put a child molester in the Senate.
There is no equivalency. The senior Republican Senator from Alabama came out against Roy Moore.
A v**e for Moore is a v**e to put a child molester in the Senate.
I***t.
Dec 12, 2017 21:57:02 #
DIRTY HARRY wrote:
Will still have to pass a Congressional ETHICS investigation if he gets elected ... and that brings us back to the original subject Congress an Ethics in one sentence ... an Enigma or oxymoron..
He won’t have to face a Congrssional ETHICS investigation, moron. He wasn’t a member of Congress.
Dec 12, 2017 21:59:47 #
cwp3420 wrote:
He won’t have to face a Congrssional ETHICS investigation, moron. He wasn’t a member of Congress.
😂😂😂😂
Dec 12, 2017 22:10:36 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
cwp3420 wrote:
He won’t have to face a Congrssional ETHICS investigation, moron. He wasn’t a member of Congress.
The Turtle says he will.
Dec 12, 2017 23:23:47 #
Dec 13, 2017 15:00:49 #
Dec 13, 2017 15:01:25 #
Dec 13, 2017 15:02:27 #
Dec 13, 2017 15:09:20 #
DIRTY HARRY wrote:
cwp3420
Hey dimwit. You might try using the "reply" button when you answer someone. Otherwise, people have no clue as to whom you are talking to and you come off as a buffoon. Like now.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.