Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Are film cameras long time forgot?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 7 next> last>>
Dec 2, 2017 08:03:30   #
KLambar Loc: New Jersey
 
I still use my Minolta Maxxum 800si

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 08:27:01   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
I still have my Nikon F from 1963 and a more modern Nikon F100. Although I have film in the freezer I seldom use film anymore. Digital is very convenient and the quality is superb.
I do not see any reasons to shoot film and then scanning the negatives or slides. Besides working twice the image is not an original and that could impact quality although that is only my assumption.

Shooting negative film or b&w and taking them to a technician to be develop and printed, except for a few exceptions it is inviting to disaster since the technician prints in an auto machine and usually colors are not corrected. All of that is avoided when we work on a digital file with editing software, assuming the lab that is doing the prints has color corrected its printing machines.

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 08:53:36   #
jccash Loc: Longwood, Florida
 
Quinn 4 wrote:
Lately I have been think have film camera become a thing of the past. Looking on Main Photography Discussion I see none about film camera. I put up for sale a Mamiya C330, which was in very good conduction , I was asking $200 for it. Had 1420 views on it, but not one person asking about the camera. I like film cameras and use them, people look at me if I was from another time period when I have one of my film cameras with me. So is my Pentax K1000, Canon AE-1 & AE-1 Program, Nikon F, Leica IIIb. Two Retina cameras I have and other cameras on their to trash can of history? PS: The Mamiya C330 was sold to a local person, who got wind that I it for sale.
Lately I have been think have film camera become ... (show quote)


Recently I saw a ladies black-and-white pictures she developed using a rangefinder camera. I forget which brand and model her camera was. The pictures are beautiful.

Reply
 
 
Dec 2, 2017 09:04:58   #
Stanhope Loc: New York City
 
In the eighties, I used to develop and print b&w, sometimes spending all night in the fixer fumes. I don't have time to do that now. I'm not a superb printer, so the world hardly lost anything when I shut down my darkroom. But I have scores of film cameras and use them in rotation. I pay a lab to do the processing. My best camera is a Voigtlander Prominent II. Yes, I shoot digital for fun, but not on images I want to last. You can't be a historian if you write on tissue paper.

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 09:15:06   #
Jim Plogger Loc: East Tennessee
 
Ched49 wrote:
Well, film cameras are from another time period but that doesn't mean people don't shoot film anymore. I was thinking about getting one myself.


I have one for sale. PM me if you are interested.

http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-499739-1.html

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 09:40:22   #
richardsaccount
 
I recommend that you go on You Tube. Type in film photography. You will find a lot of channels about film availability, processing and of course short tutorials on camera types. What is refreshing is that many of the channels are run by young people. There are still a few "Art Photographers" I would say mostly seasoned ones, that still use film. I think that it may have something to do with a look that they have cultivated over the decades. I myself have a slew of film cameras that I have had for a long time. I will use them on occasion. There is something enjoyable about using my wife's Pentax K1000. The slower pace and simplicity is refreshing. Either film or digital, they are both harmless activities as far as I am concerned.

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 09:42:53   #
Edia Loc: Central New Jersey
 
Back in the day, what separated Pros from amateurs was the number of pictures they could take at a shoot. Most amateurs could not afford to develop a lot of exposures at one time and would only submit 3 or 4 rolls of 36 exposure film for development. Pros would go through a lot of film, develop it themselves and find the keepers to print. With digital and PP, there is no limit to the number of shots you can take and how you process them is also unlimited. As far as I am concerned film is dead. Just ask Kodak.

Reply
 
 
Dec 2, 2017 10:18:32   #
dmagett Loc: Albuquerque NM/Sedona AZ
 
I still shoot with my Canon A-1 and also my Canonet QL17 GIII along side with my Sony a850 and Nikon P7700.
I have fun with all of them.



Quinn 4 wrote:
Lately I have been think have film camera become a thing of the past. Looking on Main Photography Discussion I see none about film camera. I put up for sale a Mamiya C330, which was in very good conduction , I was asking $200 for it. Had 1420 views on it, but not one person asking about the camera. I like film cameras and use them, people look at me if I was from another time period when I have one of my film cameras with me. So is my Pentax K1000, Canon AE-1 & AE-1 Program, Nikon F, Leica IIIb. Two Retina cameras I have and other cameras on their to trash can of history? PS: The Mamiya C330 was sold to a local person, who got wind that I it for sale.
Lately I have been think have film camera become ... (show quote)

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 10:52:28   #
Quinn 4
 
Since I wrote topic "Are film cameras long time forget" on Friday, I been reading what people have been writing. Some people film cameras are dead, it all digital now. I have one question for those people, in ten years from now do you think that your digital camera will go up in value or down in value? The cameras I have will only go up in value in 10 years. Yes, digital cameras can do all kind of things, good and bad. I don't need batteries for most of camera. Yes, with film cameras one has to stop and think what their taking a picture of. What wrong with that. A lot of people still have good film cameras but are not using them or writing about them. Why not use them or write about them? Is it money, I been reading people will pay $800+ just for a camera and another $330 to $400 just for a lens. So it can't be money. Lazy? Lazy and sex are big time selling points. The old keep up with the Jones. How can we tell that a picture is not fake?

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 10:55:09   #
Pkfish Loc: Wilson Wy
 
I think Santa is sending me a M3 that has been cleaned and checked out. That’s only if I’ve been good.

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 11:03:56   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
Pkfish wrote:
I think Santa is sending me a M3 that has been cleaned and checked out. That’s only if I’ve been good.


You should be VERY good between now and then 😎

Reply
 
 
Dec 2, 2017 11:12:32   #
brucebc Loc: Tooele, Utah
 
I have about 75 film cameras that I don't take pictures with but I handle and admire the workmanship of quite often. Three get played with the most; Pentax 110,
Pentax LX, and the big old Pentax 6x7. I can feel it twist in my hands when that big mirror flips up, just really cool.

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 11:28:34   #
rfmaude41 Loc: Lancaster, Texas (DFW area)
 
I've got several film cameras; nikon S2, Nikon S4, Nikon F6, Nikon N90 and a Mamiya RZ67. Use most of them off and on. My absolute favorite is the S4, closely followed by the RZ67. As far as actual usage, it's the F6.

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 11:35:00   #
paul j svetlik Loc: Colorado
 
Yes!
I do develop the film and print it!

Reply
Dec 2, 2017 11:35:16   #
paul j svetlik Loc: Colorado
 
Yes!
I do develop the film and print it!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.