Why hide travel cam logos? (Page 3): But times have changed. Today ... --used to comment on an action perceived as foolish or stupid, or a statement perceived as obvious. "I left the...

Bill_de Loc: US

Rab-Eye wrote:

No, neither, I just hate when people are mean, immature and insulting. Did you know “duh” was originally a way to mock the speech of people with developmental delays (you would probably call them retards)?

But times have changed. Today ...

--used to comment on an action perceived as foolish or stupid, or a statement perceived as obvious.
"I left the keys in the ignition—duh!"

https://www.google.com/search?q=duh&rls=com.microsoft:en-US:IE-Address&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7ADFA_enUS433&gws_rd=ssl

--

rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona

I'd suggest gaffers tape. I've had some ugly experiences with electrical tape when the adhesive starts to migrate.
--Bob

Thruxton wrote:

Points well taken. Electrical tape is cheap. Why not? 🤔

OddJobber Loc: Portland, OR

bsprague wrote:

Travel with nothing that can't be replaced.

A valuable personal property rider on homeowner's (or renter's) insurance can replace stolen equipment, but there's the problem of being left mid-trip without equipment and the sting of feeling violated. If traveling more, I would get a cable reinforced strap. (I have car insurance but still lock the doors.)

geoffmalter Loc: NorCal

You're welcome to your opinion, and shooting style, as I am mine. My "Lost in Roma" shot was from about 7 feet. Would they have noticed me, being busy with their map? Probably not. But masking the bright white logo helped embolden me to get close to get the photo op I spotted.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Rab-Eye wrote:

No, neither, I just hate when people are mean, immature and insulting. Did you know “duh” was originally a way to mock the speech of people with developmental delays (you would probably call them retards)?

Boy are you bitter with life. Also you are hyper PC. To me PC is BS. I take it you are developmentally delayed.
Get over your old codger uptightness. Or send it to the Attic.

rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA

sb wrote:

It seems pretty silly to cover the logo. Most camera companies make everything from modestly-priced cameras to high-end gear. A thief is not likely to know the difference - they just know that a "big camera" might fetch some decent money from their fence or a sleazy pawn shop. When traveling I have a nondescript camera case.

Exactly. Covering the logo gives a false sense of security. An expensive camera looks expensive, with or without logo. And for the typical thief, if given the opportunity, even a $300 camera is worth the effort - easy money is easy money.

Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana

Architect1776 wrote:

Boy are you bitter with life. Also you are hyper PC. To me PC is BS. I take it you are developmentally delayed.
Get over your old codger uptightness. Or send it to the Attic.

Do you know what? I am going to apologize to you because I just saw in your signature that you are a disabled veteran. So I do sincerely apologize, and I thank you for your service.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

rook2c4 wrote:

Exactly. Covering the logo gives a false sense of security. An expensive camera looks expensive, with or without logo. And for the typical thief, if given the opportunity, even a $300 camera is worth the effort - easy money is easy money.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Rab-Eye wrote:

Do you know what? I am going to apologize to you because I just saw in your signature that you are a disabled veteran. So I do sincerely apologize, and I thank you for your service.

Thx, Just lighten up.
If you want to really battle I love to in the Attic. Otherwise comments are at times in fun.

I actually make every effort when in public with a camera no matter where to be in a high level of awareness. I did have a watch ripped off my arm by a theif but I grabbed him and beat the crap out of him while others cheered. Then the Policia showed up heard what happened and picked up where I left off. It did help being a personal friend of the Chief of the national police too.

Leitz Loc: Solms

Thruxton wrote:

In a recent link provided by another UHH member the Nat Geo writer recommended several times that travelers cover the camera logos. I'm not sure why he felt this was so important. Do you follow this practice?

No, ChrisT, I have never covered the logo.

Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana

Architect1776 wrote:

Thx, Just lighten up. br If you want to really bat... (show quote)

No desire to battle. Glad you accepted my apology. I was turned away from the military the instant they found out I had a screw in my shoulder from my football days. I admire folks like you, and would be proud to be your friend.

AzYooper Loc: Sun Lakes AZ (Almost Phoenix)

I would worry less about an unreadable tiny white logo. The thing to avoid is OEM camera strap with Nikon D850 in blazing yellow that says "come and get me" from a football field away.

Nice for the ego, but a billboard for thieves. Dump it for a RapidR or plain strap.

geoffmalter Loc: NorCal

AzYooper wrote:

I would worry less about an unreadable tiny white logo. The thing to avoid is OEM camera strap with Nikon D850 in blazing yellow that says "come and get me" from a football field away.

Nice for the ego, but a billboard for thieves. Dump it for a RapidR or plain strap.

👍 +1

DaveyDitzer Loc: Western PA

MrBob wrote:

A while back one member stated that he carried a pink diaper bag... have a pamper sticking out the top and no one will bother you.

I second diaper bags as carry bags.

cambriaman Loc: Central CA Coast

Non-distinct bag, black tape on logs. Maybe overkill, but you'll still have your gear. No shoulda, coulda, woulda's. No REGERTS!