Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Why Do You Drag Around Expensive Photo Gear?
Page <<first <prev 12 of 25 next> last>>
Jul 2, 2012 13:43:25   #
stevenkl Loc: Swainsboro,GA
 
I have been in a spot when I did not have an SLR,so I asked my freind if I could use her little Sony Cybershot.My first experience with digital! I had a fun time with it, although limited in what I could do with it. I won't give up on DSLR's. I have my Nikon D50000 and owned an Olympus E-510. Next is a D7000 , because it's bigger and better..but I still have my Nikon P/S too!
Here is a shot from that Sony Cybershot 7mp:



Reply
Jul 2, 2012 13:47:41   #
Ronny Loc: Netherlands
 
I do Real Estate photography for my clients sellers and Realtors. Why? Because Realtors are good at selling homes, but nearly all of them donot know how to take interior pictures of a home. Check for homes on the internet and look at the results. Here below is an advice from a Realtor/Photographer.


Teresa Boardman is a Realtor, Blogger, writer and photographer in Saint Paul Minnesota. Teresa has developed a simple straight forward set of instructions for her peers on how to help them with their property Photos. Here are Teresa’s instructions:


The following items are needed and my instructions should be followed to the letter. You will need: A camera, a towel, a table or sturdy flat surface a hammer, a phone and a room that needs to be photographed.
Remove camera from case.
Remove battery from camera and put it in your pocket.
Place towel on flat surface.
Place camera on top of towel.
Fold towel over camera until it is completely covered. (not the towel the camera)
Pick up the hammer and hit the camera at least 10 times. When the camera is flat you have hit it enough times.
Use the phone to call a photographer.
Carefully pick up the towel and keep it folded and toss it in the trash. (this part may take some practice)
Take the battery to a recycling center.

If these steps are followed, I promise that the end result will be better property photos.

Reply
Jul 2, 2012 13:50:40   #
PNagy Loc: Missouri City, Texas
 
Tarkus wrote:
I can't wait to hear the responses to this one. Status issues will be thrown into the dirt. Chick magnets will dwell among those in the dirt. What is it that you guys gain from all of the stuff you drag around as opposed to my new Sony P&S with the advanced electronics? I certainly don't get it, but I'm sure that you are about to bitch at me about the old school stuff.

I liked the camera so well that I bought a second. Let the sentimental technology thoughts fly ... He went that away ===>
I can't wait to hear the responses to this one. S... (show quote)


We lug around heavy, expensive equipment because we like to impress others. My 400mm atop Mount Scott in Oklahoma drew a crowd. I also feel very important when I am not allowed to use my camera where there is a rule against "big," or "professional" cameras. I lost a great shot opportunity that way when my cameras were not allowed atop the tallest building in Mexico City. What's a good shot compared to being recognized for having top notch gear?

Reply
 
 
Jul 2, 2012 13:54:11   #
krgatlgm Loc: Las Vegas, Nv
 
dave_roe wrote:
Because I can?

I often ask myself the same question - do I really need all this stuff. Two bodies, several lenses and the answer was always the same - backup, backup and at least I am prepared.

At the end of a trip it seems I used one body maybe two lenses but hey I had it if I needed it.........

It also got to the point I budgeted extra time at airports to make the far away gates and then it hit me......

Get a case with a handle and wheels.........


Nice avatar!! caught my eye :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Jul 2, 2012 14:00:20   #
krgatlgm Loc: Las Vegas, Nv
 
CaptainC wrote:
Because I need a camera compatible with my Pocket Wizard TT5 remotes. :-)

Oh - Swamp Gator - those images are phenomenal! But think how good they COULD have been with a P&S with fancy electronics! Such a shame.


LMAO on both responses!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :thumbup:

Reply
Jul 2, 2012 14:05:37   #
ALYN Loc: Lebanon, Indiana
 
Well--surprise--I'm with you! I have an Olympus SP 800 UZ with a 30X wide angle zoom with many programs and features.
Great camera, top quality glass but complicated. Very competitively priced. ALYN

Reply
Jul 2, 2012 15:02:24   #
bikinkawboy Loc: north central Missouri
 
Some magazines are well known for their superior photography, such as National Geographic. I wonder how many of those world class photos have been taken with a point and shoot? Very few I suspect, mainly because they don't and can't produce the photo quality required.

I have and use all three types of cameras, point and shoot at work and a bridge and DSLR for home and vacation. Each has pros and cons and I use which one is best suited for the job at hand. And yes, sometimes I do look like a Japanese tourist with my camera equipment.

Reply
 
 
Jul 2, 2012 15:12:40   #
Strider
 
If it works for your for what you do, then use it. I use what works for me. Size doesn't matter if the end result is what you expect. Everything else is insignificant and a waste of time to argue about.

Reply
Jul 2, 2012 15:18:40   #
jim charron Loc: Ontario Canada
 
Played a dirty trick on my friend, no too long ago.

He knew I was in the market for a new camera.

He knew I lusted after the Canon 5D "big dog".

He is also into photography, and he has seen many many pictures I have taken, with my current Dslr.

Well I do alot of research and am surprised with current models, but still not 100% happy and think its the right time to bite the bullet so I went ahead and bought a toy for the mean time, Sony HX9V.

Intended to use the sony as a carry along camera.

I take a few snaps and tell my friend thru email, that I finally pulled the trigger on my wet dream, Canon 5D camera.
And provided the pictures from my Sony to prove it.

Guess what, he ate it up; because beleive it or not the pic's are good, regardless of camera used.

:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Reply
Jul 2, 2012 15:31:09   #
JBTaylor Loc: In hiding again
 
Rbo36 wrote:
Nikonian72 wrote:
90% of people are satisfied with snapshots obtainable with cell phones and P&S cameras. The rest of us are photographers.


Nikonian, your 'photographs' are great but I think some of my 'pictures' taken with an Olympus Point & Shoot camera
are not to be scoffed at either. If I had the money maybe I could be a 'photographer' (if I had the knowledge and ability). In the mean time I just have to try to be the best 'snopshot' picture taker I can be.


Nice photo. It's not the equipment that makes the difference between a photo and a snapshot. I had a point & shoot with some manual capability that I took both photographs and shapshots with. Now I have DSLR that I take both photographs and shapshots with. I was pleased with the output of my point & shoot at low ISO and under ideal lighting.

I carry a DSLR and related accessories around now because my old P&S died and I wanted to get better images than a P&S can get in less than bright sunny day conditions.

Reply
Jul 2, 2012 15:48:41   #
shadow1284 Loc: Mid-West Michigan
 
Twelve pages of responce!!! Why arn't we all out taking great photographs with the best equipment we can afford and enjoying the experience.
No, I didn't read all 12 pages. Bye!!!

Reply
 
 
Jul 2, 2012 16:29:20   #
nikon_jon Loc: Northeast Arkansas
 
Tarkus wrote:
I can't wait to hear the responses to this one. Status issues will be thrown into the dirt. Chick magnets will dwell among those in the dirt. What is it that you guys gain from all of the stuff you drag around as opposed to my new Sony P&S with the advanced electronics? I certainly don't get it, but I'm sure that you are about to bitch at me about the old school stuff.

I liked the camera so well that I bought a second. Let the sentimental technology thoughts fly ... He went that away ===>
I can't wait to hear the responses to this one. S... (show quote)


If you know an f stop from a bus stop, you don't need to ask that question. If you don't know a bus stop from an f stop, then I guess you need the fancy technology to do your thinking for you. But that's ok with me. What ever turns you on.

Reply
Jul 2, 2012 16:37:34   #
dragonfist Loc: Stafford, N.Y.
 
nikon_jon wrote:
Tarkus wrote:
I can't wait to hear the responses to this one. Status issues will be thrown into the dirt. Chick magnets will dwell among those in the dirt. What is it that you guys gain from all of the stuff you drag around as opposed to my new Sony P&S with the advanced electronics? I certainly don't get it, but I'm sure that you are about to bitch at me about the old school stuff.

I liked the camera so well that I bought a second. Let the sentimental technology thoughts fly ... He went that away ===>
I can't wait to hear the responses to this one. S... (show quote)


If you know an f stop from a bus stop, you don't need to ask that question. If you don't know a bus stop from an f stop, then I guess you need the fancy technology to do your thinking for you. But that's ok with me. What ever turns you on.
quote=Tarkus I can't wait to hear the responses t... (show quote)


Jon the funny part of that is if his P & S is a fairly advanced model it probably has all the manual settings. He just may know the difference. I assume since you eschew technology you not only still use a light meter, wouldn't own a camera or lens with
auto focus and probably still drive a car with a stick shift and an armstrong starter located under the radiator.

Reply
Jul 2, 2012 16:42:27   #
johnfromsouthwell Loc: Southwell, Notts. UK
 
I tend to use my powershot G12 more than my 5D MK 2 mainly because of the swivelling viewing screen. Many shots are best taken from low down or high up and the G2 screen makes this much easier for people like me. I am 81, if I kneel down I can't get up. Even so, there is no doubting that for quality results with controlled depth of field etc. full frame beats the G2 easily. When I need the quality I take someone with me to help me up and maybe carry the tripod.

Reply
Jul 2, 2012 16:46:20   #
photobob1968
 
Sometimes the photos of the chicks are good enough that I sell them to the chick calendar outfit!

sinatraman wrote:
small depth of field, larger sensor, better images, the ability to print photos at much larger sizes, higher quality lenses, the ability to use polarizer and nd filters, and the fact that chicks dig the long lenses!!!!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 12 of 25 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.