Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
FOV: Another Reason For the D850
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Oct 5, 2017 13:12:37   #
Jim Bob
 
jmvaugh wrote:
You don’t need to justify to Hoggers that you want a new camera - just get it and enjoy! If you need Hoggers votes to convince your Significant Other, whose also your Chief Financial Officer, then: OMG, you really need that brand new D850 with the bigger, high resolution sensor to save your photography!
Your welcome.
You don’t need to justify to Hoggers that you want... (show quote)


Now that's what I'm talkin' 'bout.

Reply
Oct 6, 2017 07:21:51   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
OddJobber wrote:
That's the problem. Wider lens = fewer pixels on target = less detail.


Your panning technique needs to be improved upon. I used to sit by the road and shoot fast cars going by until I got it right. Either that are you ARE TOO OLD for this, maybe retirement from shooting fast birds in flight should be considered. I am 68 and use the Nikon D500 with the 200-500, I usually fill the frame, have the bird centered, and my keep rate for focus is 98% and my keep the bird in the frame rate is 100%. Again, it's technique and practice. Keep at it, I have great confidence in you.

Reply
Oct 6, 2017 07:24:25   #
mborn Loc: Massachusetts
 
When you shoot BIF cutting of parts happen, practice practice practice zoom out your D500 and 200-500 combo is what I use and still cut off part of birds

Reply
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
Oct 6, 2017 07:32:45   #
cthahn
 
The photographer takes the picture, not the camera.

Reply
Oct 6, 2017 07:38:16   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
OddJobber wrote:
I want birds with all their parts.


So do the birds. : )

Reply
Oct 6, 2017 08:30:27   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
In the first place, the right term is angle of view and not field of view. If your reactions are not what they used to be (welcome to the senior club) what makes you think a different camera will bring those fast reactions back?

Reply
Oct 6, 2017 11:13:01   #
OddJobber Loc: Portland, OR
 
camerapapi wrote:
In the first place, the right term is angle of view and not field of view. If your reactions are not what they used to be (welcome to the senior club) what makes you think a different camera will bring those fast reactions back?

Ohnonono, papapapi!
"In photography, angle of view (AOV) describes the angular extent of a given scene that is imaged by a camera. It is used interchangeably with the more general term field of view." - Wikipedia
It's an established fact that a better camera makes you a better photographer. Also, faster AF and larger field of view give me more time on target.

Reply
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Oct 6, 2017 11:15:40   #
OddJobber Loc: Portland, OR
 
cthahn wrote:
The photographer takes the picture, not the camera.


Is there an echo in here or did you think of that just for me? My shots without a camera are less than good.

Reply
Oct 6, 2017 11:19:03   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
camerapapi wrote:
If your reactions are not what they used to be (welcome to the senior club) what makes you think a different camera will bring those fast reactions back?

Camera isn’t fixing reactions. Going to wider view gives more time in which to react {I’m 69, so I understand the problem}

Reply
Oct 6, 2017 11:20:34   #
OddJobber Loc: Portland, OR
 
billnikon wrote:
Your panning technique needs to be improved upon. I used to sit by the road and shoot fast cars going by until I got it right. Either that are you ARE TOO OLD for this, maybe retirement from shooting fast birds in flight should be considered. I am 68 and use the Nikon D500 with the 200-500, I usually fill the frame, have the bird centered, and my keep rate for focus is 98% and my keep the bird in the frame rate is 100%. Again, it's technique and practice. Keep at it, I have great confidence in you.
Your panning technique needs to be improved upon. ... (show quote)

Just wait until next year, youngster. I'm 69. But thanks for your encouragement.

Reply
Oct 6, 2017 11:22:58   #
Acountry330 Loc: Dothan,Ala USA
 
Keep the Nikkor 200-500, and get that new D-850. It will not make your reactions any faster but it is one nice camera. Happy shooting.

Reply
 
 
Oct 6, 2017 11:23:02   #
OddJobber Loc: Portland, OR
 
rehess wrote:
Camera isn’t fixing reactions. Going to wider view gives more time in which to react.


Asked and answered. Yes! Wider view, as in bigger sensor.

Reply
Oct 6, 2017 11:24:38   #
OddJobber Loc: Portland, OR
 
Acountry330 wrote:
Keep the Nikkor 200-500, and get that new D-850. It will not make your reactions any faster but it is one nice camera. Happy shooting.


I like your thinking. I'll keep one of everything.

Reply
Oct 6, 2017 11:28:02   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
OddJobber wrote:
One step at a time amfoto. But now that you mention it, is anyone making an 8 X 10 inch digital sensor yet?


Hold out for the 9x11. You'll be able to stop for a smoke and still get the bird.

http://www.largesense.com/products/8x10-large-format-digital-back-ls911/

--

Reply
Oct 6, 2017 12:51:17   #
OddJobber Loc: Portland, OR
 
rehess wrote:
Camera isn’t fixing reactions. Going to wider view gives more time in which to react {I’m 69, so I understand the problem}

Finally, someone who does understand my point!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.