Voss wrote:
My impression is that street photography can be viewed in several ways. The major ways I see are: 1) as documentation, where the photographer is making a record of an event (hence the idea that a shot must be candid rather than posed), and 2) as art, where the subject is presented, but in an aesthetically-pleasing manner. But it should still reflect the human-environment relationship. I think this, too, should be candid, but there is disagreement about this. (It seems that some of the great shots of some of the "masters" are not as candid as we are led to believe.) At this point, I feel that the manipulation of a street photo for the sake of art is legitimate, but should be to a relatively minor degree, and it should not alter the nature of the subject.
My impression is that street photography can be vi... (
show quote)
I might note that fully understanding that philosophy is no doubt both a cause and an effect for the wonderful Street examples that you post!