Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Street Photography
March Against Sharia #2
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jun 15, 2017 10:34:29   #
AnthonyM Loc: Pasadena, CA
 
I was thinking about the dude's head in bottom right corner of #1 and the OOF box in upper left corner.
Perhaps the trash can(?) in lower right corner of #2 could go. Or not...

I don't know if it's Kosher to remove stuff from street photos, and your message in these images is clear to me, so perhaps best to leave them alone. Sorry to be so noncommittal, but you have greater expertise in this field than I do.

Reply
Jun 15, 2017 13:11:19   #
Voss
 
AnthonyM wrote:
I was thinking about the dude's head in bottom right corner of #1 and the OOF box in upper left corner.
Perhaps the trash can(?) in lower right corner of #2 could go. Or not...

I don't know if it's Kosher to remove stuff from street photos, and your message in these images is clear to me, so perhaps best to leave them alone. Sorry to be so noncommittal, but you have greater expertise in this field than I do.


The head maybe could have been cloned out without too much difficulty. The other two would be much more difficult. And to be honest, I don't know where the boundaries are in relation to that kind of thing. Recently I read about a photographer who was roundly criticized for cloning his street photos. But the examples I saw involved major cloning--like removing entire people. Perhaps others have some thoughts on the matter?

Reply
Jun 18, 2017 19:18:07   #
10MPlayer Loc: California
 
Voss wrote:
Just a few more. The last shot is of anti-marchers.


Last shot title: America First, or maybe We're No.1

Reply
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Jun 18, 2017 19:21:27   #
10MPlayer Loc: California
 
AnthonyM wrote:
I was thinking about the dude's head in bottom right corner of #1 and the OOF box in upper left corner.
Perhaps the trash can(?) in lower right corner of #2 could go. Or not...

I don't know if it's Kosher to remove stuff from street photos, and your message in these images is clear to me, so perhaps best to leave them alone. Sorry to be so noncommittal, but you have greater expertise in this field than I do.

I expect in any art form there are expectations for what's allowed or not allowed. But it is art, so why not manipulate it if that is in your vision of what you want to express.

Reply
Jun 18, 2017 21:11:40   #
Voss
 
10MPlayer wrote:
Last shot title: America First, or maybe We're No.1


Perhaps you're right, and I totally misinterpreted what he was saying. That can happen if we don't sit down together and respectfully listen to each other.

Reply
Jun 18, 2017 21:40:24   #
Voss
 
10MPlayer wrote:
I expect in any art form there are expectations for what's allowed or not allowed. But it is art, so why not manipulate it if that is in your vision of what you want to express.


My impression is that street photography can be viewed in several ways. The major ways I see are: 1) as documentation, where the photographer is making a record of an event (hence the idea that a shot must be candid rather than posed), and 2) as art, where the subject is presented, but in an aesthetically-pleasing manner. But it should still reflect the human-environment relationship. I think this, too, should be candid, but there is disagreement about this. (It seems that some of the great shots of some of the "masters" are not as candid as we are led to believe.) At this point, I feel that the manipulation of a street photo for the sake of art is legitimate, but should be to a relatively minor degree, and it should not alter the nature of the subject.

Reply
Jun 19, 2017 00:02:24   #
Apaflo Loc: Anchorage, Alaska
 
Voss wrote:
My impression is that street photography can be viewed in several ways. The major ways I see are: 1) as documentation, where the photographer is making a record of an event (hence the idea that a shot must be candid rather than posed), and 2) as art, where the subject is presented, but in an aesthetically-pleasing manner. But it should still reflect the human-environment relationship. I think this, too, should be candid, but there is disagreement about this. (It seems that some of the great shots of some of the "masters" are not as candid as we are led to believe.) At this point, I feel that the manipulation of a street photo for the sake of art is legitimate, but should be to a relatively minor degree, and it should not alter the nature of the subject.
My impression is that street photography can be vi... (show quote)


Dead on!

I might note that fully understanding that philosophy is no doubt both a cause and an effect for the wonderful Street examples that you post!

Reply
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Jun 19, 2017 07:30:30   #
Voss
 
Apaflo wrote:
Dead on!

I might note that fully understanding that philosophy is no doubt both a cause and an effect for the wonderful Street examples that you post!


Thank you, Apaflo.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Street Photography
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.