Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Shooting RAW
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
May 15, 2017 06:27:06   #
mikedidi46 Loc: WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
 
I used to shoot RAW & JPEG, now I am using just RAW

Reply
May 15, 2017 06:34:08   #
pecohen Loc: Central Maine
 
winterrose wrote:
Like most hobby snappers I shoot RAW for the same reason that I put a number on the door and painted a big white stripe over the roof of my shopping jalopy.

Not because it makes my clapped out old bomb go any faster, but it makes me feel like I'm a racing driver.

Why do I shoot RAW? Here are some reasons.

1. I tend to be risk averse. Shooting RAW is like taking out insurance in case something goes wrong. As a bonus, this insurance is practically free.

2. That little view-finder on my camera is not so good at showing me much detail and the back screen is usually even worse. Shooting RAW lets me pick up more detail and it may turn out to be useful when I can examine and edit my shot on a big screen.

3. I actually enjoy the editing process and having a RAW image to work with means greater latitude in doing that editing.

Why don't I shoot RAW all the time?

a. My camera (Sony A6000) has some features that work only with JPEG. Sometimes I get curious about them so I take some test shots.

b. Panorama mode is one of the features that, on my A6000 at least, only produces JPEG images. I don't use use this much but on occasion I do.

c. If I am in a hurry to get an image that does not have to be a quality image I might shoot jpeg.

Reply
May 15, 2017 08:16:07   #
edhayes Loc: Williamsburg, VA
 
Shooting in RAW gives you the ability to do so much more with the image when processing the image with what ever software you use. Shooting in JPEG severely limits this. Memory card are so inexpensive that it would be foolish not to.

Reply
 
 
May 15, 2017 08:28:02   #
Silverman Loc: Michigan
 
Gene51 wrote:
No, you absolutely got it right. You set your camera for optimum exposure, which is not wrong at all. Although I had a quite colorful exchange on another thread that had the guy absolutely convinced my exposure was wrong and I would have done better had I shot it as a jpeg. Go figure.

It's one of the things you can do more effectively than with a jpeg. I do it all the time, but I use my experience with my camera to set the exposure based on the highest amount of light I can use without blowing the highlights, using the camera's spot meter mode.

That's exactly what I did for this image:

Running a quick black and white conversion will help you set black and white clipping points, and adjust shadow/highlight, contrast, clarity and dehaze (if you are using Adobe CC software).
No, you absolutely got it right. You set your came... (show quote)


Well as a Rookie at UHH here, I vote for #2

Reply
May 15, 2017 08:34:04   #
Silverman Loc: Michigan
 
Silverman wrote:
Well as a Rookie at UHH here, I vote for #2


I myself as a Rookie, have purchased a Nikon D3300 with 3 lens and have absolutely "0" experience in image processing, and having a Acer Chromebook 15 laptop, do not know exactly what Photo-editing program I may use on this Chromebook, so I now ask my fellow UHH Photographer's to aid and guide me in my Photo-editing education. HELP!


Reply
May 15, 2017 08:37:50   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
winterrose wrote:
Like most hobby snappers I shoot RAW for the same reason that I put a number on the door and painted a big white stripe over the roof of my shopping jalopy.

Not because it makes my clapped out old bomb go any faster, but it makes me feel like I'm a racing driver.


I don't "shoot" anything.

I *record* images in raw and/or JPEG, according to the requirements of the situation. I like both approaches, and I use them for entirely different reasons and in very different situations.

I'm not an absolutist. There is a continuum of tools and solution paths. I have no "workflow religion."

Reply
May 15, 2017 08:38:08   #
fergmark Loc: norwalk connecticut
 
I found this article which I thought to be worth sharing http://www.michaelfurtman.com/jpeg_myths.htm

Reply
 
 
May 15, 2017 08:38:38   #
mborn Loc: Massachusetts
 
JeremyVan wrote:
Quick question for you more experienced photographers.
I shoot raw and some times set my exposure wrong on purpose knowing I can correct it better later cause I shot it in raw.

For example I was shooting a professional mountain bike race and it was the middle of the day and the sun was behind the riders and I didn't want to blow out the sky but also did not want to have the rider under exposed.
I chose to slightly under exposed the rider and slightly over expose the sky with the plan of changing the exposure on both parts of the image after the fact.

Is this a common practice? Or am I missing something and doing it wrong?

Thanks
Jeremy
Quick question for you more experienced photograph... (show quote)


Right On

Reply
May 15, 2017 08:43:38   #
cthahn
 
Stupid

Reply
May 15, 2017 08:43:41   #
breck Loc: Derbyshire UK
 
rmalarz wrote:
Well, we each have our own reasons for shooting RAW. If that is yours, so be it. Mine is to capture the most data the camera can capture. In fact, my technique of using RAW extends past the usual amount, coupled with metering the subject to accommodate that capture. It's an extension of the control I achieve when shooting film. It's more than just a paint stripe, but I'll make the most of your paint stripe if I photograph your car.
--Bob


Here Here

Reply
May 15, 2017 08:52:09   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
cthahn wrote:
Stupid


If you are going to call someone stupid, at least use "Quote Reply" so we know who you think is stupid.

Reply
 
 
May 15, 2017 09:17:12   #
moonhawk Loc: Land of Enchantment
 
fergmark wrote:
I found this article which I thought to be worth sharing http://www.michaelfurtman.com/jpeg_myths.htm


Interesting..He has much the same attitude as Ken Rockwell. Me, I don't care about what publishers want, I want to play with my images. they often bear very little resemblance to the original, when I'm done with them. So, It's RAW for me.

But he makes a good point for those who shoot for publication, I suppose.

Reply
May 15, 2017 09:33:44   #
Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana
 
winterrose wrote:
Like most hobby snappers I shoot RAW for the same reason that I put a number on the door and painted a big white stripe over the roof of my shopping jalopy.

Not because it makes my clapped out old bomb go any faster, but it makes me feel like I'm a racing driver.


I doubt that "most" non-pros shoot RAW for the same reason as you. I have several reasons, but I'll just mention one big one--I convert many photos to B&W, and when you do that to a JPEG, you lose a lot (contrast decreases, for example.)

Reply
May 15, 2017 09:36:55   #
Djedi
 
winterrose wrote:
Like most hobby snappers I shoot RAW for the same reason that I put a number on the door and painted a big white stripe over the roof of my shopping jalopy.

Not because it makes my clapped out old bomb go any faster, but it makes me feel like I'm a racing driver.


I do it because I like the sound and look of the word "RAW"!!!

But seriously, I find that I like at least a hint of detail in my highlights and certainly a modicum of detail in the shadows. Try getting that shooting a white racing car on a sunlit track while still getting detail in the driver's black suit when shooting jpeg. I find I get at least 2 extra stops on the highlights and deepest shadows with my D800 shooting RAW.
W

Reply
May 15, 2017 09:45:47   #
ole sarg Loc: south florida
 
Why not shoot both it don't cost nothing?

I think most of the raw shooters are old guys like myself and pp on the one hand gives them something to do with the time on their hands and the other gives them an excuse to be away from the wife!



rmalarz wrote:
Well, we each have our own reasons for shooting RAW. If that is yours, so be it. Mine is to capture the most data the camera can capture. In fact, my technique of using RAW extends past the usual amount, coupled with metering the subject to accommodate that capture. It's an extension of the control I achieve when shooting film. It's more than just a paint stripe, but I'll make the most of your paint stripe if I photograph your car.
--Bob

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.