graybeard wrote:
I have a Canon T3 which I use with several Canon and Tamron automatic lenses, all of which work fine in all modes. I also use a few old film lenses and have spotty performance based on my camera's light meter not seeming to work right. When I am in M or AV modes, and mount, for example, my Mamiya/Sekor F1.4 lens (via a programmable M42/EOS adapter) the meter will work fine when the camera's aperture is set to 1.4 and the lens aperture ring is set to 1.4. Just like a film camera I can adjust my shutter speed and/or ISO and the light meter will respond correctly, as proved by a properly exposed image. But if I set the aperture on the camera to anything other than 1.4 and adjust the SS/ISO to center the light meter, I end up with an overexposure, of slight to extreme, based on how much off 1.4 it is. By ignoring the light meter and guessing, I can get a good exposure after enough trial and error. I realize that the same amount of light is entering the lens regardless of the camera setting, but shouldn't the meter be measuring this accurately? Also, all my manual lenses have this problem, and one of the ways I can get a good exposure is to use the aperture ring on the lens, but again it is without any help whatever from the meter. 40 years I used film SLRs and never had trouble with the meter (unless the battery was dead). Anybody else have this problem, or am I missing something here ??
I have a Canon T3 which I use with several Canon a... (
show quote)
Hi,
It sounds as if the problem is getting accurate meter readings. But if the camera does fine with modern lenses, it must be you doing something wrong with the vintage lenses (assuming they don't have a stuck aperture or other problem)>
"I realize that the same amount of light is entering the lens regardless of the camera setting, but shouldn't the meter be measuring this accurately?"
While it's true that the amount of light ENTERING the lens is the same, the amount of light EXITING the lens and being metered changes when you stop a vintage lens down. To use your Mamiya/Sekor example, f/2 allows in half the light that f/1.4 does.... and f/2.8 lets in one quarter as much.... f/4 one sixteenth... etc. With fully manual lenses such as this, the aperture must actually stopping down any time you change the setting. You'll see your viewfinder dimming down. (This is not the case with your modern lenses, where the aperture is kept fully open until the very instant of exposure, when it momentarily stops down to whatever you've set using the camera or the camera sets using one of the auto exposure modes, then reopens after the shutter has closed.)
Vintage lenses call for "Match Needle Metering" when using manual control of lenses such as these on this camera. After setting the aperture you wish to use, you basically need to adjust the shutter speed and/or ISO to center or "0 out" the indicator on the metering scale, assuming your subject/scene is "average tonality". Camera needs to be in M or fully Manual mode when doing this.
It is possible to use Av or Aperture Priority auto exposure mode with vintage, manual aperture lenses.... But you cannot use Tv (Shutter Priority), Program or any of the Scene modes with this type of lens. If using Av, the camera basically takes care of it for you, adjusting the shutter speed as you change the aperture setting. (I don't think your T3 has "Auto ISO", which is another form of auto exposure, even when used with "Manual" setting.)
It also sounds as if you have some experience using various cameras, so you might already know...
Your camera has choice of several metering patterns. I'm not sure about T3, but many Canon offer: Evaluative, Center Weighted, Partial and Spot metering patterns. Evaluative is a modern method that meters the entire scene but puts the most emphasis around the active AF point, sort of assuming that's where your primary subject is in the image area. This mode works pretty well most of the time. Center Weighted is "old school".... similar in that it measures the entire area, but now just adding some emphasis to the center of the scene (sort of hoping that's where the subject is located and is what's most important). Partial reduces the size of the area being metered to the central 25% or 30% of the image area (exact percentage varies from model to model) and Spot Metering is even smaller.... usually between 1.5% and 3.5% of image area, if your camera has it. Partial and Spot can be useful with a backlit subject, for example. But the smaller the area of the scene being metered, the more precise any adjustments you make for subject tonality must be.
Which brings me to the other big consideration.... All modern cameras with built-in metering necessarily use a
reflective metering system. This measures the light being reflected back at you from the subject and so is strongly influenced by scene/subject tonality. Reflective meters assume what they are seeing is "average tonality". This actually works out pretty well a lot of the time. But if the subject/scene is unusually bright the camera will want to under-expose... or if it's unusually dark, it will tend to over-expose. You might already be familiar with Exposure Compensation, which allows you to override auto exposure to correct what the camera is trying to do if you're photographing a bride in a white wedding gown in a snow scene (requiring some + E.C.)... or a black bear in a coal mine (needing some - E.C.).
But when you're doing fully manual exposure, as you might be with those vintage lenses, there isn't any E.C. (though your camera might use the same scale as a meter read-out, most Canon do). It only works in auto exposure modes. Instead if the scene or subject isn't "average" tonality you need to bias your manual exposure settings.
You might find Bryan Peterson's "Understanding Exposure" helpful. I know you are an experienced shooter, but even an old dog like me learned some new tricks from Peterson's book. It's a great "refresher course", if nothing else.
An alternative is to use a separate, handheld
incident light meter. This type of meter measures the light falling onto the subject, rather than what's being reflected off of it. Because of that, when used right an incident meter doesn't need any correction for subject tonality and takes much of the guesswork out of setting an accurate exposure. It can be used to set up the camera and lens fully manually... or to double check that auto exposure is giving accurate exposures. As a bonus, many incident meters are also a flash meter, can be used to accurately set up multi-strobe studio arrangements or on-location multi-flash.
Finally, you mention that the adapter you are using on your vintage lenses is "chipped". All that does is allow the camera's Focus Confirmation to work (just be sure to set the camera to One Shot focus mode while there's still an autofocus lens on it). The "chip" might be programmable so that the lens being used is recorded in the EXIF data of images... but the chip doesn't offer any control over the lens aperture at all (nor auto focus, of course).