Okay, I see your question. I have personally done no research, but I have read in various places statements about privatising Social Security which means your part of the money will be shared with a for-profit plan. Your benefits go down to pay high salaries and bonuses to management and dividends tl stockholders. Vouchering Medicare to buy insurance has the sane effect. Now, of course, the devil is in the details and that has yet to happen. To be sure, there will be small armies of lobbyists in the bill crafting and latter regulation writing. To get an eyeball on how that works check out Steven Brill's "Ameirica's Biiter Pill" - it chronicals the before and after process of the PPACA. It makes for instructive reading.

Letter to the Denver Post:

The United States Senatorial v****g since 2012 has resulted in Republican Senators, who number 52 out of 100, receiving 54.8 million v**es. By contrast, Democratic Senators, the remaining 48 Senators, have received 78.4 million v**es, 23.5 million more v**es collectively than the Republican contingent, a 59-41 percent majority for Democrats, if it were a straight head-to-head e******n. The Senate, then, is ruled by only 41 percent of the American e*****rate in our Democracy. This anomaly of American democracy is a carryover compromise the Constitutional Convention had to make in order for the Southern S***e States to agree and to sign our Constitution out of concern that the lesser populated South would be outnumbered in any Congressional v**e to abolish s***ery. Similar to the E*******l College, wherein Clinton won the popular v**e by nearly 3 million v**es, this ancient compromise leaves the majority of Americans subject to Senatorial rule by a group distinctly in the minority of American citizens. The Democrats in the House of Representatives in 2012 won 1.17 million more v**es than Republicans, yet they only won 46.21 percent of the seats. In 2014, Republicans won 52 percent of v**es in House races, yet won 57 percent of the seats. In 2016, The Democrats won 48% of the total v**es for House candidates to the Republicans 49%, yet the Republicans won 55% of the seats. (Independent v**es bring the total to 100%.) The American e*****rate majority is severely under-represented in all three: the presidency, the senate and the house of representatives. America is a democracy wherein majority does NOT rule.

And Republicans have the unmitigated gall to claim a "mandate". Freaking pack of thieves, corporate and NRA pimps, and colossal liars.

Okay, I see your question. I have personally done no research, but I have read in various places statements about privatising Social Security which means your part of the money will be shared with a for-profit plan. Your benefits go down to pay high salaries and bonuses to management and dividends tl stockholders. Vouchering Medicare to buy insurance has the sane effect. Now, of course, the devil is in the details and that has yet to happen. To be sure, there will be small armies of lobbyists in the bill crafting and latter regulation writing. To get an eyeball on how that works check out Steven Brill's "Ameirica's Biiter Pill" - it chronicals the before and after process of the PPACA. It makes for instructive reading.

You do understand that Social Security is a Ponzi scheme and that the return you would have gotten by the private investment of your contributions would far exceed what you will receive in Social Security benefits. I know that for the far left anything associated with for profit is a bad thing, no matter that the track record may be far better than any thing that the government has ever done. The so called privatization of Social Security only allows for a percentage of your contribution to be privately invested and it would be in a controlled fashion similar to most company's 401K programs.