markngolf wrote:
I don't think ADMIN interferes with these type "dialogues". It would improve the site for the rest of us, if ADMIN did monitor and keep it sane and free of this type vitriolic chatter. Maybe, freedom of press & speech prohibit that.
Thanks for your support.
Mark
Mark, I know that I am a significantly guilty party in this situation, but I mostly agree with you.
What do we do with someone like MT that spreads misinformation periodically and presents that information as fact? Unfortunately these things sometimes cross multiple threads. I have no objection to the information MT has put in this thread, but he sometimes gets things very wrong and yet will not even discuss those things.
How do we address those situations? I've tried being polite and it doesn't even move the needle. The man doesn't seem to want to respond to reasonable questions or to even provide any evidence to support his assertions.
We have seen B&H (Henry and Hershel) and Adorama (Helen) on the receiving end of significant abuse here on UHH and yet they continue to respond in a highly professional manner. If we compare and contrast that with MT's contributions does he meet the same standards?
MT does add significant value, but he does sometimes get things wrong as we all do. If he can't actually deal with those situations in a civil manner then what does that say about the rest of his statements? If he can't deal with things when he really is wrong, then what does that say about his credibility?
For myself, unfortunately, I have lost trust in MT's integrity. I'm totally happy with B&H, Adorama, Amazon (when used carefully), even eBay, but I struggle to do that with MT when he is unwilling to respond.
So, I may be guilty here, but I certainly don't see MT as an innocent victim, just another opinionated person such as myself.