I have a Canon 40D and was thinking about a new camera. Would like to switch to Nikon and maybe get the Nikon 3300 for starters. Would that be a good choice.
Heli pilot wrote:
I have a Canon 40D and was thinking about a new camera. Would like to switch to Nikon and maybe get the Nikon 3300 for starters. Would that be a good choice.
Only you can make that choice. No one else. Any opinions you get either pro Nikon or pro Cannon are going to be biased opinions. Do your own research. Consider what kind of photography you do. Determine what your budget is. Then evaluate camera models to determine which ones deliver what you need. If it comes down to there not being a clear winner between Canon or Nikon then chose the one your gut is leaning towards.
Go to your nearest store and get the feel of the Nikon in your hands and play with it whilst there and take a couple of shots
I have a Nikon d3200 and am happy with it and the d3300 gets good reports
Bkh42
Good hunting😀
Why not mirror less ? With the recent advancements in electronics and optics , mirror less might provide you with more choices . If size and weight are issues , give it real close look. There's a ton of stuff on YouTube.
As you can see from my signature , my gear is all Fuji- now. I just switched from Nikon DX to the Fuji and am having a placed . Your mileage may differ.
Good hunting .
I've been using Nikon equipment since 1971. It would be a good choice. However, it's your choice in the end. First off, why do you want to switch? What does Nikon offer that your Canon doesn't? Do you have a collection of lenses for your Canon? If so, you'll have to scrap those. They won't work on you new Nikon. There's lots to consider. That is all up to you.
--Bob
Heli pilot wrote:
I have a Canon 40D and was thinking about a new camera. Would like to switch to Nikon and maybe get the Nikon 3300 for starters. Would that be a good choice.
The new D3400 is almost the same but has a few significant improvements. Also, it is listed on B&H at the exact same price as the D3300 (bundles include 18-55mm lens or two lenses with the 70-300mm lens). Now would be a great time to buy a new Nikon camera because of the discounts being offered. Not sure how long it will last, and they only offer them a couple of times a year.
If you have a certain price range in mind, look at all the DSLR options that fit your needs and budget. Get the best and newest model you can afford. The D3400 seems to only be offered with the bundles that include lenses, which are a very good deal.
Hope this helps!
Heli pilot wrote:
I have a Canon 40D and was thinking about a new camera. Would like to switch to Nikon and maybe get the Nikon 3300 for starters. Would that be a good choice.
If I had it to do all over again by turning the calendar back in time, I would opt for Leica over Nikon or Canon. If not Leica, then Canon over Nikon.
I will not recommend a new system. Keep on using Canon if you are satisfied with the ergonomics and performance.
You have the lenses anyway.
abc1234
Loc: Elk Grove Village, Illinois
If you used the 40D this long, then you must like Canon and will love the 80D. So many improvements and the learning curve will be a lot less than switching brands. As for brands, when all is said and done, they are all excellent and no single brand has it all.
As for lenses, if you have older lenses, you will be pleasantly surprised with the quality of today's lenses.
I don't think you can have a good answer asking such a question here. Everyone has different idea and ultimately only your opinion is important. In my opinion I have used Nikon SLRs for 39 years and I like Nikon better than Canon but I certainly do not recommend you to switch.
Looking for something a little lighter and the best Quality in Pictures. Is the 5300 the same size as the 3300
Heli pilot wrote:
Looking for something a little lighter and the best Quality in Pictures. Is the 5300 the same size as the 3300
Nothing wrong with starting over, other than the expense of replacing both lenses and camera body (and brand specific accessories ...). If looking smaller or lighter, consider the EOS SL1.
Have you handled a Nikon? They're not wrong, just opposite in the most fundamental ways. Try putting the lens on. Try navigating the menus. You'll be surprised ... Do they produce better pictures? No: the photographer does that.
Heli pilot wrote:
Looking for something a little lighter and the best Quality in Pictures. Is the 5300 the same size as the 3300
You should be doing this kind of research yourself. Go to B&H and click on each camera you are considering. Look at the Specs, down near the bottom of the list, and it will give you the weight.
That said, to answer your question, the 3300 is 30 grams lighter than the 5300 and they are virtually the same size. As for quality of images, take a look at the specs and decide for yourself. And, as others have said, it is the photographer not the camera that determines how good they are. The camera only makes a difference in the technical aspect of capturing light and recording the image.
Have you considered getting the newer models of each of these cameras?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.