Trying to create a photo book and am getting bumped on resolution
Sep 20, 2016 14:59:45 #
Should had thought about utbe university. Where I go for some problems.
www.google.com/search?q=create+a+photobook&client=ms-android-verizon&prmd=sivn&source=lnms&tbm=vid&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwicr9rqz57PAhVK0oMKHRdzBnoQ_AUICSgD&biw=360&bih=512&dpr=3
www.google.com/search?q=create+a+photobook&client=ms-android-verizon&prmd=sivn&source=lnms&tbm=vid&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwicr9rqz57PAhVK0oMKHRdzBnoQ_AUICSgD&biw=360&bih=512&dpr=3
Sep 20, 2016 20:07:16 #
romanticf16 wrote:
You may have sent 72dpi images meant for monitor viewing and posting to websites INSTEAD of sending jpegs at a dpi of 240-300 needed for print production?
Why on Earth would you send 72PPI files for monitor viewing?
Sep 20, 2016 20:08:44 #
Sep 20, 2016 20:18:33 #
CaptainC wrote:
It was my first time doing a photo book. It was for print and I didn't know better! Once again, I learned from our community. I'm not sure that answered your question. Much thanks, JenniferWhy on Earth would you send 72PPI files for monitor viewing?
Sep 20, 2016 20:22:00 #
Thank you very much for your thoughtful replies. I appreciate all of your comments. Best Regards, Jennifer
Sep 20, 2016 20:24:55 #
dirtpusher wrote:
My thanks was meant for you. I am learning and your post made me feel okay about that. Thank you for being a value-added member of this community. Jenniferwe all learning.
Sep 20, 2016 20:39:35 #
jdm wrote:
It was my first time doing a photo book. It was for print and I didn't know better! Once again, I learned from our community. I'm not sure that answered your question. Much thanks, Jennifer
My point is that there is NO reason to use 72PPI for monitor viewing as the pixel pitch is irrelevant.
Sep 20, 2016 20:47:46 #
jdm wrote:
It was my first time doing a photo book. It was for print and I didn't know better! Once again, I learned from our community. I'm not sure that answered your question. Much thanks, Jennifer
Great - glad that was easily repaired. My point is that there is NO reason to EVER use that silly 72PPI thing for monitor use. Monitors have no idea what pixel pitch means. All that matters is pixel dimensions. a 1000x1500 pixel image will display at the same size whether is is 72ppi, 267ppi, 344ppi, etc.
So knowing that, you will never make that error again.
Sep 20, 2016 21:03:59 #
CaptainC wrote:
Great - glad that was easily repaired. My point is that there is NO reason to EVER use that silly 72PPI thing for monitor use. Monitors have no idea what pixel pitch means. All that matters is pixel dimensions. a 1000x1500 pixel image will display at the same size whether is is 72ppi, 267ppi, 344ppi, etc.
So knowing that, you will never make that error again.
So knowing that, you will never make that error again.
Thank you CaptainC. Regards, Jennifer
Sep 20, 2016 21:07:36 #
jdm wrote:
Hi Awesome Hogs, br br I recently volunteered to ... (show quote)
If you post one of your JPGs with store original, then we can help you to better solve the problem.
Sep 20, 2016 21:12:48 #
jcboy3 wrote:
thanks jcboy3, I uploaded way higher res images and the book came out great! My thanks for your help!If you post one of your JPGs with store original, then we can help you to better solve the problem.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.