Oh My..Decisions Decisions
May 7, 2012 15:56:40 #
I am in the market for a new Nikon. Thought I'd made my decision with the D7000. Then, along comes the D3200. Since I have AF-S lenses, the D3200 isn't a problem. I know the D7000 is much sturdier and m.o.l. dust proof. But, the weight is a factor. I currently have a D80 and my arthritis acts up in my hand.
Bottom line: I do shoot parties & some pet photography. What would be the customers perception if I used the D3200? It's the old "bigger is better" idea I guess. Sorry to get so wordy.
Bottom line: I do shoot parties & some pet photography. What would be the customers perception if I used the D3200? It's the old "bigger is better" idea I guess. Sorry to get so wordy.
May 7, 2012 16:00:30 #
don't think most people would notice the model number, know what it means, or even care as long as the photos came out nice. if anyone asks you can tell them the 3200 is the latest model nikon and is highly recomended in the reviews.
May 7, 2012 16:09:03 #
sinatraman wrote:
don't think most people would notice the model number, know what it means, or even care as long as the photos came out nice. if anyone asks you can tell them the 3200 is the latest model nikon and is highly recomended in the reviews.
The D5100 is lightweight, similar to the D3200. It has gotten good reviews. kenrockwell.com dpreviews.com
If your clients are that concerned with the model camera you are using, ask them to buy you a D800 or D4. You can't choose equipment based on what people think because most people do not get enough practice. Nikon DSLRs can take excellent photos.
May 7, 2012 16:30:26 #
I guess I'm thinking what other photogs wouldthink. In fact, I'm probably thinking too much on the issue. Bottom line is it will cost less $ & maybe allow me to get another lens. Thanks for holding my hand on this!
Steve
Steve
May 8, 2012 10:30:07 #
You might also consider the D5100. It has the same sensor as the D7000 and some other highly attractive features such as an articulated screen and is about half the price.
The one thing that would keep me from the D3200 is that it doesn't have infared inputs. The D5100 has them both bow and stern and I find I use the remote release frequently...more often from the back. I don't know if the D7000 has that.
The one thing that would keep me from the D3200 is that it doesn't have infared inputs. The D5100 has them both bow and stern and I find I use the remote release frequently...more often from the back. I don't know if the D7000 has that.
sah2o wrote:
I am in the market for a new Nikon. Thought I'd ma... (show quote)
May 8, 2012 11:40:23 #
I just recently purchased the D5100 Nikon, and I must say, part of
the reason I purchased it was the weight factor because I too was
concerned about the arthritis factor. It is a great camera... I am
going to take a class on how to use it, since I came from a point
and shoot Olympus digital and this is considerably more complicated
than the point and shoot. These photos were taken with the D5100.
I am happy with them, but I am working on getting the focus spot-on!
the reason I purchased it was the weight factor because I too was
concerned about the arthritis factor. It is a great camera... I am
going to take a class on how to use it, since I came from a point
and shoot Olympus digital and this is considerably more complicated
than the point and shoot. These photos were taken with the D5100.
I am happy with them, but I am working on getting the focus spot-on!
Viburnum using 18-55mm lens
Moon shot in the afternoon/55-300 lens
Papa smoking his pipe/18-55mm lens
May 8, 2012 12:31:58 #
The D-7000 is not that heavy. I just got one. With the 24-70 2.8 attached it can get quite tiring to cary by hand. That is why they make straps. My arthritis will act up but I so enjoy shoting. The little pills helps with the pain.
May 8, 2012 14:10:26 #
Don't worry about what other photogs think. The proof is in the print.
Reminds me of the discussion about painting camera bodies, so it is the same color as everyone else's.
I miss that discussion. So many wonderful ideas.
Reminds me of the discussion about painting camera bodies, so it is the same color as everyone else's.
I miss that discussion. So many wonderful ideas.
May 8, 2012 14:14:13 #
MtnMan wrote:
The one thing that would keep me from the D3200 is that it doesn't have infared inputs. The D5100 has them both bow and stern and I find I use the remote release frequently...more often from the back. I don't know if the D7000 has that.
Yes, it does. It makes a big difference being able to stand back and activate the remote, rather than have to reach around in front of the camera.
May 8, 2012 15:10:34 #
Acountry330 wrote:
The D-7000 is not that heavy. I just got one. With the 24-70 2.8 attached it can get quite tiring to cary by hand. That is why they make straps. My arthritis will act up but I so enjoy shoting. The little pills helps with the pain.
The other reasons I'm considering the D3200 is 1) cost differential to D7000 & 2) 24meg vs 16. Seems to me you could crop much closer without losing focus/detail.
May 8, 2012 15:15:42 #
sah2o wrote:
The other reasons I'm considering the D3200 is 1) cost differential to D7000 & 2) 24meg vs 16. Seems to me you could crop much closer without losing focus/detail.
Acountry330 wrote:
The D-7000 is not that heavy. I just got one. With the 24-70 2.8 attached it can get quite tiring to cary by hand. That is why they make straps. My arthritis will act up but I so enjoy shoting. The little pills helps with the pain.
The other reasons I'm considering the D3200 is 1) cost differential to D7000 & 2) 24meg vs 16. Seems to me you could crop much closer without losing focus/detail.
Here's a comparison of the 3200 and 5100. You can use this site to do other camparisons.
http://snapsort.com/recommend#!brand=Nikon&general=price&price=750&type=DSLR
And the D3200 vs D7000
http://snapsort.com/compare/Nikon-D3200-vs-Nikon_D7000
May 8, 2012 18:38:58 #
sah2o wrote:
The other reasons I'm considering the D3200 is 1) cost differential to D7000 & 2) 24meg vs 16. Seems to me you could crop much closer without losing focus/detail.
The other reasons I'm considering the D3200 is 1) cost differential to D7000 & 2) 24meg vs 16. Seems to me you could crop much closer without losing focus/detail.
If cost is important how come you are leaving out the D5100? Several have told you it takes the same pics as the D7000 because it has the same sensor, and it is 50% less in price.
We've already mentioned some of the other advantages of the D5100 such as the articultated screen and infared remote inputs.
I'd be cautious on more megapixels. In the same size sensor they usually come at the expense of increased noise. I've yet to see a noise comparison between this new sensor and the D5100/7000 sensor. One person mentioned it might be a problem.
May 8, 2012 21:41:01 #
MtnMan wrote:
quote=sah2o br The other reasons I'm considering... (show quote)
I believe it was Ken Rockwell that stated it's the same sensor as in the D4...but I'llhave to verify
May 8, 2012 22:00:09 #
If the weight of any camera is causing problems, I would suggest using a monopod. I have chronic headache and if I hang a camera around my neck it aggreavates the headache. Using my monopod for times when I am moving a lot has kept the headache in its normal condition.
May 9, 2012 06:19:08 #
I want to thank everyone for offering valid opinions. Rest assured that before I buy anything, I will get my hands on different models for evaluation. And yes, the D5100 will be considered also. Thanks again every one.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.