Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Sony RX10 111
Page <prev 2 of 2
May 22, 2016 19:10:24   #
le boecere
 
lone ranger wrote:
i just purchased the very hard to find Sony RX10 111....its a fabulous mirrorless bridge camera..it boasts a 600MM Zeiss lens that goes from 2.8 to F4.at 600MM...and shoots 4k Video as well....The camera is loaded with so many options..its going to take me a little while to master all it can do,even with my engineering background!!....but it surely is worth it!!.does anyone else have any experience with this camera??


Tom Dempsey recently changed his advice about primary cameras for "light travel".

http://photoseek.com/2016/sony-rx10-iii-superb-25x-travel-zoom-outshines-11x-on-aps-c/

Reply
May 24, 2016 12:57:42   #
Shutterbugsailer Loc: Staten Island NY (AKA Cincinnati by the Sea)
 
le boecere wrote:
Tom Dempsey recently changed his advice about primary cameras for "light travel".

http://photoseek.com/2016/sony-rx10-iii-superb-25x-travel-zoom-outshines-11x-on-aps-c/


I saw the images in this website, as well as those in Ken Rockwell's review, and I agree 100% that this is perhaps the best choice for getting eye-popping images in a reasonably light and portable package. IMHO, those images are good enough for 90% of enthusiast photographers, unless their primary interests are night photography, action sports, or extreme long distance wildlife. I also feel that it could be an option for less demanding professional applications such as local real estate publications, cruise ship photos, or low budget outdoor weddings. The only fly in the ointment is that it's build quality and potential durability is not worthy of its $1600.00 asking price. Were this model to be used as a primary camera for a serious hobbyist or professional, in all likelihood, Sony would be swamped by warranty claims.

Reply
May 24, 2016 13:22:03   #
le boecere
 
Shutterbugsailer wrote:
I saw the images in this website, as well as those in Ken Rockwell's review, and I agree 100% that this is perhaps the best choice for getting eye-popping images in a reasonably light and portable package. IMHO, those images are good enough for 90% of enthusiast photographers, unless their primary interests are night photography, action sports, or extreme long distance wildlife. I also feel that it could be an option for less demanding professional applications such as local real estate publications, cruise ship photos, or low budget outdoor weddings. The only fly in the ointment is that it's build quality and potential durability is not worthy of its $1600.00 asking price. Were this model to be used as a primary camera for a serious hobbyist or professional, in all likelihood, Sony would be swamped by warranty claims.
I saw the images in this website, as well as those... (show quote)


I'll be taking another workshop from him, this fall, when he gets back from his summer excursions. I'll be interested to see how the camera holds up for "light travel".

Reply
 
 
May 24, 2016 13:41:49   #
Shutterbugsailer Loc: Staten Island NY (AKA Cincinnati by the Sea)
 
le boecere wrote:
I'll be taking another workshop from him, this fall, when he gets back from his summer excursions. I'll be interested to see how the camera holds up for "light travel".


Hope you are delighted with your results. Just remember to bring along a backup camera in case it craps out

Reply
May 24, 2016 14:35:16   #
le boecere
 
Shutterbugsailer wrote:
Hope you are delighted with your results. Just remember to bring along a backup camera in case it craps out


Now realize I wrote that incorrectly. I don't own an RX10_, but have had several conversations with Tom about his past and current choices for "light travel" ~ (my own current Sony's are an a6000 + a new RX100III for the pocket). I intend to attend another local workshop, taught by Dempsey, when he returns from his August trip to Switzerland. I'll be asking him about the durability of his RX10 III, at that time.

His wife (and travel companion) is now carrying a Panny ZS100, and he probably has an old first generation RX100 in his pocket, when not packing one of the larger cameras. I'm guessing he'll leave his new a6300 + lenses at home, dunno. (one camera with one permanently attached zoom lens does seem like a good concept for his type of "light travel")

http://photoseek.com/2016/5138/

Sorry for the confusion.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.