markngolf wrote:
...I had 2000+ images to view, sort, adjust and upload to one of my Shutterfly sites....
That's what Lightroom is all about... handling large volumes of images quickly (the trade-off is that it's NOT a complete individual image editing tool, which is why it's packaged with Photoshop)..
markngolf wrote:
....upload to Shutterfly...
Are you able to Export (i.e., "upload" during the conversion process) directly to Shutterfly? I know some common sites are built into LR, just not sure if Shutterfly is one of them. If not, do a search for Jeffrey Friedl's website and plug-ins... I'm using his Exposure-Manage export tool and it works very well.
markngolf wrote:
...It seems many UHHers use LR to import images. I had never done that. Decided to try it. I love it!! It reduces the selection process to about 1/10 the time and I discovered I can open multiple photos in PS for editing.... ...
I'm not sure how letting LR "download" images off your memory cards would speed up the process by very much or at all, if that's what you mean. I don't use that, but do Import all my images into LR once they've been copied into a folder on my... same thing and just as fast, as far as I can tell.
markngolf wrote:
... Now I just have to learn how to delete the ones not worthy of keeping from the catalog. Can't be too hard....
It's not hard at all. If you use the "flags" (which can be done from a menu or with a key stroke) to "pick", "reject" or just leave images unflagged, you can later have LR delete all the rejects en masse, if you wish. You'll be given the choice to remove the images just from the LR catalog, or to delete them both from that and from your hard disk (permanent and complete deletion). If you do the latter, don't forget to empty your recycle bin on your desktop (note: this will really make the deletion permanent... so be certain). A large number of image files in the recycle bin and "on the desktop" will cause your computer's performance to bog down.
markngolf wrote:
...
I may have to read the 500 page book by Scott Kelby I've had on my bookshelf for 4 months!!!...
You definitely should read it and keep it near your computer for reference. It's a huge help getting the most out of LR. There are all sorts of features you won't know to use, unless you spend a little quality time studying. I'd suggest a quick read of the book... then keep it nearby so that you can go back and study individual items more closely while working in LR. To me, that's the best way to learn your way around LR.
I made up my own cheat sheet for keystroke shortcuts, in particular. Those can be a huge time saver when you have 2000 images to plow through!
Also, have you learned about the "Previous" button yet? When you have a large number of images to tweak and are working through them one at a time, often you'll find several in a row that need mostly the same adjustments... and that's where this button comes handy. It will quickly apply all the same settings as were used on the immediately preceding image. (There's also a "Sync" button, when you have more than one image selected. I sometimes use that to apply some things to an entire batch of images.. such as a particular keyword or lens profile corrections or a change to the copyright info.)
markngolf wrote:
...I usually view them, one at a time, in Windows Photo Viewer, open the better ones in PS....
Windows Photo Viewer isn't very good. For one, it's not color calibrated.
Also, you must be shooting JPEGs only, because RAW files are not viewable in Windows PV or in Explorer. One of the key reasons for using LR is that it can handle high volume of RAW files, in particular.
However, still can't see them in Windows... So something else you might find useful is a codec called Fast Picture Viewer. This makes it possible for Explorer to display RAW thumbnails and Windows PV to show them larger. This can be a real time saver when dealing with a large batch of images (even though in Win PV a RAW will always appear lower contrast and desaturated).
Last time I looked Fast Picture Viewer only cost about $10. It works great with most any RAW file. I've used it with RAW files from Canon, Nikon, Pentax and Oly cameras.... Haven't had occasion with Sony yet, but it will handle them too, I know. Also will display a TIFF and some other files types that Windows normally can't handle. Works great and is a real time saver!