Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Analysis
Full moon, 2015-11-25
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Nov 27, 2015 06:40:25   #
waegwan Loc: Mae Won Li
 
filzfotoz wrote:
There are no dumb questions - only dumb mistakes!

Yes to the tripod and remote release. My camera does have magnification in live view. My problem was the image was so washed out that I couldn't see detail to focus on it. I also use an Android app called DslrDashboard on my tablet tethered to my camera but I couldn't find the cable for it so used the remote.

Love your 300 mm shot. (Is that with a cropped senser or full frame?)

Mrs. Claus tells me that 500 mm lens I'm drooling over is just out of the question! Guess I just have to make do with my 200. I'll keep toiling with it.

A bad day of photography is better than my best day at work!
=================================
There are no dumb questions - only dumb mistakes! ... (show quote)


My camera is full frame but that doesn't make any difference on the focal length or sharpness.

You might try a good 2X tele-converter to push your 200 lens to 400. It won't be as good as a regular lens but it should be better than without. I'd shoot one for you tonight but we have too much cloud cover, maybe sometime over the weekend.

Reply
Nov 27, 2015 06:46:35   #
waegwan Loc: Mae Won Li
 
Ugly Jake wrote:
How about a second body / lens ? The SX-50 ?


That's not bad. Was the moon low or high in the sky? I live in a valley in South Korea by the time we see the moon it is always high in the sky. I remember seeing moons in the US when they were low in the sky and sometimes it looked like you could reach out and touch it.

Reply
Nov 27, 2015 07:03:30   #
Bloke Loc: Waynesboro, Pennsylvania
 
waegwan wrote:
That's not bad. Was the moon low or high in the sky? I live in a valley in South Korea by the time we see the moon it is always high in the sky. I remember seeing moons in the US when they were low in the sky and sometimes it looked like you could reach out and touch it.


That is an optical illusion caused by seeing it close to objects on the ground. You should get that same effect even when it rises from beyond a hill...

Reply
 
 
Nov 27, 2015 12:18:28   #
boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
 
filzfotoz wrote:
Nikon D5100, Nikkor 55-200 lens, 1/60 sec., f/22, ISO 200
My question: This is the best of about 100 shots. Most are out of focus. How do I focus on the moon for clear images??? I tried the LCD screen, can't see it well enough to adjust, TTL no better. Resorted to autofocus with moon centered so the autofocus could do its job and got about 10 decent shots. Want to shoot the moon with some trees / buildings / people in the images but focusing is always a problem. HELP?!?!?!


You shot this at 1/60 second. It's amazing how much the moon moves, so you must shorten the shutter speed to at least 1/250

Reply
Nov 28, 2015 11:23:13   #
hiker60 Loc: Northern Idaho
 
nice shot

Reply
Dec 4, 2015 19:56:58   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
No one has mentioned haze. I'm not a moon shooter but you're tackling lots of atmosphere on a moon shot. I think it would be a major issue in some locations, not so much in others.

Reply
Dec 4, 2015 21:49:44   #
par4fore Loc: Bay Shore N.Y.
 
filzfotoz wrote:
Nikon D5100, Nikkor 55-200 lens, 1/60 sec., f/22, ISO 200
My question: This is the best of about 100 shots. Most are out of focus. How do I focus on the moon for clear images??? I tried the LCD screen, can't see it well enough to adjust, TTL no better. Resorted to autofocus with moon centered so the autofocus could do its job and got about 10 decent shots. Want to shoot the moon with some trees / buildings / people in the images but focusing is always a problem. HELP?!?!?!

F22? Try f/5.6-F/8 to avoid lens diffraction. Also use "exposure delay mode" , I think its D4 in the custom settings. This will put the mirror up for 2 seconds to avoid additional vibration. Good luck.

Reply
 
 
Dec 5, 2015 08:13:00   #
Peeb Loc: NE Oklahoma
 
boberic wrote:
You shot this at 1/60 second. It's amazing how much the moon moves, so you must shorten the shutter speed to at least 1/250


Not sure that's motion blur. Here is the moon at 1/45 second at f/13 with a nikon 55-300 zoomed to 300, then cropped.

Not stellar, but much less blurry than OP effort. I do agree that motion blur is an issue that must be taken into account, however. Amazing how fast the moon tracks across the night sky. Stars too.

cropped moon
cropped moon...
(Download)

Reply
Dec 5, 2015 14:05:25   #
Bear2 Loc: Southeast,, MI
 
Very nice!
Duane


quote=Peeb]Not sure that's motion blur. Here is the moon at 1/45 second at f/13 with a nikon 55-300 zoomed to 300, then cropped.

Not stellar, but much less blurry than OP effort. I do agree that motion blur is an issue that must be taken into account, however. Amazing how fast the moon tracks across the night sky. Stars too.[/quote]

Reply
Jan 13, 2016 11:19:39   #
wolfman
 
One taken at night, and one in the early evening. Both were taken with my arm resting on a wrought iron railing, using auto focus . Both were heavily cropped. D810 & Sigma 150-600 Sport.

1/160, f/8, ISO 200, 600 mm
1/160, f/8, ISO 200, 600 mm...
(Download)

1/500, f/8, ISO 400, 600 mm
1/500, f/8, ISO 400, 600 mm...
(Download)

Reply
Jan 13, 2016 18:58:30   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
filzfotoz wrote:
Nikon D5100, Nikkor 55-200 lens, 1/60 sec., f/22, ISO 200
My question: This is the best of about 100 shots. Most are out of focus. How do I focus on the moon for clear images??? I tried the LCD screen, can't see it well enough to adjust, TTL no better. Resorted to autofocus with moon centered so the autofocus could do its job and got about 10 decent shots. Want to shoot the moon with some trees / buildings / people in the images but focusing is always a problem. HELP?!?!?!

Hey Fil, your Shutter Speed is way to slow, the f/stop is to slow and the ISO to high.
The Moon is a moving target and transverses through the Lens very quickly.
I would start with 1/200 sec, f/5.6, ISO 100 for your Camera on a tripod.
Adjust the Shutter Speed up if need be.
Use the Autofocus and the Vibration Control too.
Craig

Reply
 
 
Jan 14, 2016 12:25:54   #
wolfman
 
CraigFair wrote:
Hey Fil, your Shutter Speed is way to slow, the f/stop is to slow and the ISO to high.
The Moon is a moving target and transverses through the Lens very quickly.
I would start with 1/200 sec, f/5.6, ISO 100 for your Camera on a tripod.
Adjust the Shutter Speed up if need be.
Use the Autofocus and the Vibration Control too.
Craig

There is nothing wrong with ISO 200, and you don't use VR when on a tripod.

Reply
Jan 14, 2016 13:06:53   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
wolfman wrote:
There is nothing wrong with ISO 200, and you don't use VR when on a tripod.

1. You do Not use ISO 200 on a very bright subject.
2. You Do use VR on a moving subject.
Craig
1/200 sec, ISO 100, f/8, 600mm Lens, VR on a tripod.
To say don't use VR on a Tripod is a complete Myth.


(Download)

Reply
Jan 14, 2016 13:55:48   #
wolfman
 
CraigFair wrote:
1. You do Not use ISO 200 on a very bright subject.
2. You Do use VR on a moving subject.
Craig


Really, a moving subject. How far do you think the moon is going to travel in 1/160th to 1/200th of a second. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with using ISO 100, but there is certainly nothing wrong with ISO 200. One more thing, you DO NOT use VR when on a tripod when your head is locked down.

Reply
Jan 14, 2016 14:13:43   #
Normanicus Loc: Glasgow : Scotland
 
To get decent shots of the moon you have to use a long lens with camera on a tripod.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Analysis
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.