jpeg
Jul 28, 2015 07:12:34 #
johneccles wrote:
I stopped using RAW over a year ago now. The main ... (show quote)
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jul 28, 2015 07:12:44 #
Jul 28, 2015 07:30:45 #
Wahawk wrote:
Change them, YES, but "Improve" them??? That is questionable and up to the individual taste of every photographer AND VIEWER!!
Post something and let's have a go at it. You be the judge. :)
Jul 28, 2015 07:32:13 #
[quote=Bobbee]
Also, if I did not want to edit the RAW, I could.......just go into PS, click the Image Processor button, and boom, I have JPGS.[quote]
But the JPG this produces is not the same (or as good) as a JPG the camera produces with custom settings. BOOM.
Also, if I did not want to edit the RAW, I could.......just go into PS, click the Image Processor button, and boom, I have JPGS.[quote]
But the JPG this produces is not the same (or as good) as a JPG the camera produces with custom settings. BOOM.
Jul 28, 2015 07:34:32 #
[quote=Delderby][quote=Bobbee]
Also, if I did not want to edit the RAW, I could.......just go into PS, click the Image Processor button, and boom, I have JPGS.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :lol: :lol:
Also, if I did not want to edit the RAW, I could.......just go into PS, click the Image Processor button, and boom, I have JPGS.
Quote:
But the JPG this produces is not the same (or as good) as a JPG the camera produces with custom settings. BOOM.
But the JPG this produces is not the same (or as good) as a JPG the camera produces with custom settings. BOOM.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :lol: :lol:
Jul 28, 2015 07:36:49 #
waegwan wrote:
Post something and let's have a go at it. You be the judge. :)
I won't post anything for anyone else to play with, because any shots I keep (more than 80% of my shots) are the way I want them, sometimes with a LITTLE pp but usually with very little or NONE!! I know how to properly expose my shots for the effects I want.
Jul 28, 2015 07:39:50 #
Wahawk wrote:
With todays cameras, from P&S to Bridge to DSL... (show quote)
Best quote I ever read on this forum, thanks.
Jul 28, 2015 07:51:21 #
Delderby wrote:
When shooting JPG the photogs can make all the dec... (show quote)
"The RAW will usually be flat and nasty before PP" Maybe that depends on the camera and software. I use an old Canon 50D and I shoot RAW and JPG and I have the resolution on the camera maxed out. I use Paint Shop Pro X7 on 64 bit Windows 7. My RAW files are sharper and the color is truer. The JPGs are really good but when I compare them side by side the edges on things like painted lines on a curve are sharper in the RAW file and colors are noticeably better when compared side by side. Maybe it's just because of the camera but maybe something worth noting when trying to decide.
Jul 28, 2015 07:54:41 #
ecrocker wrote:
I have been shooting raw with ff cameras for years and was considering a newer crop dslr. How good are theses camera using jpeg, since raw is time consuming. What kind of results are you getting?
Also would be interesting knowing if anyone that once used raw is no using only jpeg?
thanks for your reply!
Also would be interesting knowing if anyone that once used raw is no using only jpeg?
thanks for your reply!
Oh no. Not again. :thumbdown:
Jul 28, 2015 07:56:02 #
WessoJPEG wrote:
Best quote I ever read on this forum, thanks.
I agree with the first paragraph only.
Jul 28, 2015 08:04:29 #
ecrocker wrote:
I have been shooting raw with ff cameras for years and was considering a newer crop dslr. How good are theses camera using jpeg, since raw is time consuming. What kind of results are you getting?
Also would be interesting knowing if anyone that once used raw is no using only jpeg?
thanks for your reply!
Also would be interesting knowing if anyone that once used raw is no using only jpeg?
thanks for your reply!
I use a Canon 50D crop sensor and I shoot RAW and JPG at the same time. The JPGs are really good but when compared to the RAW at the same time before any PP in Paintshop Pro X7 the RAW is noticeably sharper and truer colors.
Jul 28, 2015 08:04:51 #
ecrocker wrote:
I have been shooting raw with ff cameras for years and was considering a newer crop dslr. How good are theses camera using jpeg, since raw is time consuming. What kind of results are you getting?
Also would be interesting knowing if anyone that once used raw is no using only jpeg?
thanks for your reply!
Also would be interesting knowing if anyone that once used raw is no using only jpeg?
thanks for your reply!
I use a DX (D7100 and an older D70s constantly and never shoot jpg..I do all of my RAW (NEF) to jpg conversios AFTER I have everything adjusted in Lightroom. Don't Compromise your images. Shoot in RAW then convert. Remember that anything you shoot in jpg will always be jpg and you can never go back. Anything that you shoot in RAW (NEF) can be converted to jpg, tiff or what ever at anytime and you still have your original RAW and it's container or side car with adjustments. Plus you can always make RAW Duplicates in Lightroom and adjust, crop or whatever each seperately. While LR does allow for some lattitude in JPG, it is nowhere near what you have in RAW.
Jul 28, 2015 08:12:47 #
waegwan wrote:
"The RAW will usually be flat and nasty befor... (show quote)
You surprise me - usually all digipics need some sharpening. BUT RAWS are not sharpened "in camera", however JPGs ARE sharpened "in camera" even if left to mfgs default settings.
Usually colors in RAWs are not so good before PP - they are, after all, raw pics designed for developing and improving out of camera. :-)
Jul 28, 2015 08:16:03 #
dcampbell52 wrote:
I use a DX (D7100 and an older D70s constantly and... (show quote)
Yes - but LR and PS are not the only professional editors on the globe!
Jul 28, 2015 08:20:25 #
TheDman
Loc: USA
Ah, here we go again. Same rank amateurs talking about how they know how to shoot better than all the pros.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.