Susan Davy wrote:
Panasonic ZS40 LUMIX with Leica lens shoots RAW and fits into a pocket. It takes great pics and video for a point and shoot
Also has built in GPS, WiFi, 30X optical and 120X digital.
wthomson wrote:
I'm looking for a good pocket (shirt or side pants--or recommended belt case) camera to keep in the car and take to family events (situations where I don't want to lug my DSLR or my Canon SX50). Perhaps the size of a Canon A1400 (2.44x1.18x3.74 inches / 6oz). Gotta' be able to do my "Elaine dance" at weddings without having the camera fly away ;).
Required features:
Size & weight as above
Excellent build quality
Excellent images
Optical viewfinder
Some optical zoom (eg, 5X or so)
Decent battery life
Less than $500--Refurbished is fine
Desired features:
Raw capability
Good in low light
Reasonable macro capability
Irrelevant features:
Video/sound
Giant megapixel count
Quality of screen (rarely used)
I've already searched UHH and have found little information, in particular, on the optical viewfinder requirement. Plus, I often couldn't determine the camera size without looking it up.
By the way, Costco is having a "Black Friday" event this Wednesday (7/15/2015), and I as hoping to narrow the choices by then.
I'm looking for a good pocket (shirt or side pants... (
show quote)
Personally, I prefer an optical viewfinder on a "point and shoot" camera. Some have offered some excellent suggestions, others, although I'm sure unintentionally, have not. Some of the cameras being suggested have ELECTRONIC viewfinders, not OPTICAL viewfinders. Both have their own advantages and disadvantages. If an optical viewfinder is truly what you would like, I would begin by looking at Canon's G series cameras. True, you will not be looking "through the lens", nor would you be if you were using a Leica. It has never been a problem for me. Many p&s cameras with optical viewfinders have some degree of parallax compensation, or framing correction with a zoom lens. The Canon is a fine camera and has raw capability. There is still a high demand for these cameras. Used ones, even older models, tend to be scooped up very quickly. Nevertheless, B&H usually has several in their used department at very affordable prices. Other major manufacturers also offer excellent cameras in this category, many with fixed very fast lenses. Of course you are the person to decide what camera best suits your needs; my only recommendation is to be sure that the viewfinder is in the center of the camera, or aligned with lens. Some of the p&s cameras that have the optical viewfinder located far, to one side other, from the lens have terrible parallax problems. Good luck.
khalidikram wrote:
Which Sony is this?
How big is your pocket if you can fit a 720mm lens into it? And what pocket camera from SONY are you referring to?
Or are you multiplying the digital zoom by the analog zoom to come up with that number?
If you're lucky enough to find a used or re-furb Canon PowerShot SD 500, buy it.
wilikioti wrote:
If you're lucky enough to find a used or re-furb Canon PowerShot SD 500, buy it.
:?: Ten year old technology.
7 MP on a 1/2 inch sensor, 3X optical zoom, ISO range 100-400, 2-inch LCD, 2 fps continuous, 9 AF points, 37-111mm focal range.
OddJobber wrote:
:?: Ten year old technology.
7 MP on a 1/2 inch sensor, 3X optical zoom, ISO range 100-400, 2-inch LCD, 2 fps continuous, 9 AF points, 37-111mm focal range.
Yep, that's about how long I've had mine. Still fits in my pocket, has an optical view finder, still takes great pictures and it fits the OP's requirements. :thumbup:
Chuck_893 wrote:
We are all apt to suggest the one we own, and the one I own is a Nikon P7800, which has an EVF rather than an optical finder, but the EVF is 100% and shows everything that you wish, or less, or nothing. It's more than twice the weight and size of your parameters, but it does raw, and can now be had for under $500. If you are wedded to an optical finder, there is the P7100 (I have one of those as well, serves now as my backup). Here are the specs for each:
http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/coolpix/p/p7100/spec.htm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/coolpix/p/p7800/spec.htm[/ur
[url]
http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/coolpix/p/p7100/spec.htmWe are all apt to suggest the one we own, and the ... (
show quote)
Ditto to this recommendation. I have had the P7100 for about four years and love everything about it. patrick
I use the Canon G series for that. Might be just a touch larger than you want though. 4 wide 3 tall and 1 3/4 thick. I had a G12 and now still use a G15 and G16. About a third the size of my XS50. Supper great low light. I love taking pics with natural light and stealthy.
I hope you guys had better luck,i didn't see any that I liked that would fit in my shirt pocket. the onei settled on might fit in my cargo pants pocket, but would still bulge out.
John_F wrote:
sudo is probably a typo
No...really...Panasonic never uses the full sensor for either of the aspect ratios used in the LX-100. That's why I say the quoted 20mp of the sensor is "Seudo" and a not a fully utilized 4/3 sensor. It actually only uses 16 - 18mp max of the whole sensor, depending on which ratio is chosen.
I'm not knocking the camera, but I just dislike gimmicks that make things seem untruthful or misleading. I think they did the ad and gimmick to be competitive with SONY's 20mp sensor in the RX100.
JMHO
singleviking wrote:
No...really...Panasonic never uses the full sensor for either of the aspect ratios used in the LX-100. That's why I say the quoted 20mp of the sensor is "Seudo" and a not a fully utilized 4/3 sensor. It actually only uses 16 - 18mp max of the whole sensor, depending on which ratio is chosen.
I'm not knocking the camera, but I just dislike gimmicks that make things seem untruthful or misleading. I think they did the ad and gimmick to be competitive with SONY's 20mp sensor in the RX100.
JMHO
No...really...Panasonic never uses the full sensor... (
show quote)
I agree with you absolutely. The LX-100 is certainly a very good camera, but Panasonic have spoilt things with purposefully misleading technical information.
I'd recommend the Fuji X100s or 't. The viewfinder is wonderful, the camera is excellent, speed, color, and exposure are very good. It has a fixed 35mm equiv lens which is my favourite focal length.
If you must have zoom, look for a used Canon SD800is. 28--105mm equiv zoom, but only 7Mpx. The viewfinder is adequate, but nothing special. It is a competent camera. This is my pocket backup camera for all occasions.
Bob
Delderby wrote:
Hi - please, what is a sudo-4/3 sensor?
The pseudo- micro 4/3 sensor. It's not pseudo- it's the
same sensor as used in the Panasonic and Olympus micro 4/3 mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras, like the OMD E-M5. Excellent sensor.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.