Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
I'm beginning to agree with Obama
Jul 7, 2015 07:07:09 #
RixPix wrote:
Therein lies the problem. Legislation that puts in place stringent background checks and a national database with all legal firearms registered would eliminate a lot of issues. Someone has a gun...the serial number is checked by mobile connection if it is legit then no problem if it is not then both gun and "owner" are hauled in.
I would agree, if, and only if, we had the same restrictions on speech, the press, petitions, assemblies, and churches. Then, we have to have the same burdens on anyone exercising their right against self-incrimination, and against cruel and unusual punishment.
Hell, let's just start calling it the "Bill of Privileges" and let the government decide how to administer them.
Jul 7, 2015 07:09:42 #
Kombiguy wrote:
I would agree, if, and only if, we had the same restrictions on speech, the press, petitions, assemblies, and churches. Then, we have to have the same burdens on anyone exercising their right against self-incrimination, and against cruel and unusual punishment.
Hell, let's just start calling it the "Bill of Privileges" and let the government decide how to administer them.
Hell, let's just start calling it the "Bill of Privileges" and let the government decide how to administer them.
I was going to say, don't give Obama any ideas and then I remembered, he already has that one.
Jul 7, 2015 08:16:05 #
Kombiguy wrote:
No. To the authors of the phrase, it meant "working as designed, efficient." Sort of like that brand of clock, "regulator."
A well-regulated m*****a is a m*****a that functions well.
A well-regulated m*****a is a m*****a that functions well.
:thumbup: :thumbup:
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Jul 7, 2015 10:37:47 #
RixPix wrote:
New legislation is needed to put the teeth back into the existing laws before any further restrictions should be added.
It is a fact that in areas were firearms ownership is considered an earned privilege, there are fewer incidences where firearms are an active component of the crimes.
Responsible gun owners are not the problem there needs to be regulations in place to determine if a person has earned the privilege to have firearms.
It is a fact that in areas were firearms ownership is considered an earned privilege, there are fewer incidences where firearms are an active component of the crimes.
Responsible gun owners are not the problem there needs to be regulations in place to determine if a person has earned the privilege to have firearms.
Does the constitution mention how to earn that firearms ownership privilege?
Is there a different constitution for libtardians?
Jul 7, 2015 13:04:05 #
There seems to be if you talk to one of them.
Jackinthebox wrote:
Does the constitution mention how to earn that firearms ownership privilege?
Is there a different constitution for libtardians?
Is there a different constitution for libtardians?
Jul 7, 2015 13:22:50 #
RixPix wrote:
It is a fact that in areas were firearms ownership is considered an earned privilege, there are fewer incidences where firearms are an active component of the crimes.
Unfortunately, there is a Harvard graduate, Nobel Prize winner who doesn't understand that.
Jul 7, 2015 13:29:47 #
RixPix wrote:
It is a fact that in areas were firearms ownership is considered an earned privilege, there are fewer incidences where firearms are an active component of the crimes.
It is a fact that in areas were firearms ownership is considered an earned privilege, there are fewer incidences where firearms are an active component of the crimes.
You mean like Chicago?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.