Which would you choose?
Jun 1, 2015 20:49:25 #
BebuLamar wrote:
My Nikon Df doesn't have video and I believed I had to pay more because of that.
I don't think that was the reason.
Jun 1, 2015 20:58:00 #
I think the Df was built as a nostalgia camera that only does stills even though it is an advanced DSLR. I don't think you were charged extra because it was left off. I think it was designed with purist in mind who don't do video. It gained some criticism because of that lack, but I wouldn't have let that stop me if I were a Nikon user. It is a fine camera for those who don 't care about video. Bab
Jun 1, 2015 21:05:02 #
robrory wrote:
I remember when an slr camera was used to shoot only still images. Now, with today's dslr, it is possible to also shoot video. If you could choose; would you prefer a camera that on shoots single shots or one that does both?
I have no interest in video.
Jun 1, 2015 21:26:58 #
Grammieb1 wrote:
I think the Df was built as a nostalgia camera that only does stills even though it is an advanced DSLR. I don't think you were charged extra because it was left off. I think it was designed with purist in mind who don't do video. It gained some criticism because of that lack, but I wouldn't have let that stop me if I were a Nikon user. It is a fine camera for those who don 't care about video. Bab
Certainly I chose the Df instead of the D800 or D610 but why does it cost almost twice the D610, $800 more than the D750 and only $250 less than the D810. All of those camera were introduced after the Df and yet all of them have been discounted but the Df is still selling for the same price? Isn't it because it's more expensive to make things with less features?
Jun 1, 2015 21:41:41 #
ebbote wrote:
I don't care for video on a camera, that is what a camcorder
is for.
is for.
But you pay for a camera that shoots great stills and they throw HD video in as part of the package. It's high quality HD video. There are things that you might just want to record in HD video.
Some of the younger folks, instead of typing out a long how-to list for a procedure at work, are creating short training videos. Very useful and people like them. See Adobe's training site, for example.
Jun 1, 2015 21:46:06 #
Something that is classic doesn't lose value or go out of style as quickly as something that is trendy & more common. I think that this is the reason that your Df holds its value more easily than other DSLRs. The whole premise is to appeal to a photographer who appreciates a more classic camera & doesn't easily follow trends. Bab
Jun 1, 2015 22:27:44 #
BebuLamar wrote:
Certainly I chose the Df instead of the D800 or D610 but why does it cost almost twice the D610, $800 more than the D750 and only $250 less than the D810. All of those camera were introduced after the Df and yet all of them have been discounted but the Df is still selling for the same price? Isn't it because it's more expensive to make things with less features?
No.
The Df is designed to take all F-Mount lenses, including legacy lenses which also includes pre-AI lenses.
Jun 1, 2015 22:49:56 #
Grammieb1 wrote:
Something that is classic doesn't lose value or go out of style as quickly as something that is trendy & more common. I think that this is the reason that your Df holds its value more easily than other DSLRs. The whole premise is to appeal to a photographer who appreciates a more classic camera & doesn't easily follow trends. Bab
G, now that's FUNNY!!
The Df is about as trendy as it gets!! Just because it appeals to old people doesn't mean it's not trendy.
Why do you think people buy it, and who?!?! :lol: :lol:
SS
Jun 1, 2015 23:05:02 #
Jun 1, 2015 23:43:15 #
mwsilvers
Loc: Central New Jersey
SharpShooter wrote:
G, now that's FUNNY!!
The Df is about as trendy as it gets!! Just because it appeals to old people doesn't mean it's not trendy.
Why do you think people buy it, and who?!?! :lol: :lol:
SS
The Df is about as trendy as it gets!! Just because it appeals to old people doesn't mean it's not trendy.
Why do you think people buy it, and who?!?! :lol: :lol:
SS
I don't know. I think its fits more into the definition of retro than trendy.
Retro- "Imitative of a style, fashion, or design from the recent past.
Trendy- "very fashionable or up to date in style or influence."
Jun 2, 2015 05:35:19 #
robrory wrote:
I remember when an slr camera was used to shoot only still images. Now, with today's dslr, it is possible to also shoot video. If you could choose; would you prefer a camera that on shoots single shots or one that does both?
Both, absolutely. There are times that still photos are called for -- and times when video is needed. It all depends on the situation. Why carry two when one will do it?
Jun 2, 2015 05:43:38 #
robrory wrote:
I remember when an slr camera was used to shoot only still images. Now, with today's dslr, it is possible to also shoot video. If you could choose; would you prefer a camera that on shoots single shots or one that does both?
It doesn't seem to matter much anymore - many current cameras offer video. And the quality of video is way beyond what inexpensive camcorders can produce - the bigger sensor does have an advantage.
Jun 2, 2015 05:45:33 #
Years ago you were able to select various additional options when purchasing your car. They would add to the cost of the car, but were available if you were willing to pay for it. It would be nice if that were the case for the camera also. If I could reduce the cost of my DSLR by not having the video option I would do without it.
Jun 2, 2015 05:58:55 #
robrory wrote:
I remember when an slr camera was used to shoot only still images. Now, with today's dslr, it is possible to also shoot video. If you could choose; would you prefer a camera that on shoots single shots or one that does both?
If you are a photographer then find the best camera that fills your needs. If it comes with video it's like A/C in you car.
You are not going to find many, if any, that only do pics, so your question is moot.
Jun 2, 2015 06:00:41 #
Grammieb1 wrote:
I have never used a DSLR for video, but it doesn't hurt to have the capability. It might improve resale value. Never turn down free additions. Bab
Uh...Grammieb1....that video capability in your dslr IS NOT a free addition! You pay for it...if it wasn't added to your camera, your camera would be less expensive!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.