Nicely done, Peterff, on both counts.
I don't find the first one objectionable in the least. The vast majority of such scenes probably could be underexposed by 1/2 stop to 2/3 stop. Then you could use Photoshop's Shadow/Highlight tool to equalize the values a bit. Once it hits Zillow, it's going to be a tiny, highly squashed JPEG anyway.
If your camera has a highlight compensation tool, and/or dynamic lighting control tool, play with those menu settings a bit. Some of them are surprisingly useful for holding detail.
Only a photographer will care about retaining detail in the windows. Most people know they are windows, are used to their cell phone photos being burned out there, and won't give it a second thought. It's really the shadows that have to be open.
I would strongly encourage anyone doing real estate photography to go to Zillow, Trulia, and the other real estate catalogs you can find online. Note what is there, and what is used to sell very expensive properties and average properties.
Think about the:
Aspect Ratio (usually 4:3)
Use of HDR or Shadow/Highlight tools and other post-processing
Image size in pixels and file size in KB
Subject Matter
Camera Placement
Room Layout (clutter/lack thereof)
Distortion (or lack thereof)
Use of flash, available light, or a blend
Depth of Field vs Depth of Light
White Balance Consistency (or lack thereof)
General smoothness of the entire image
Use of actual video vs. a "scan and pan" of stills
Since most of this work is done with 10-20mm (or similar range) UWA lenses on APS-C cameras, it might be shockingly interesting to download a DOF calculator and play around with the variables in it to see what sorts of depth of field you have at 10, 14, and 20 mm, at 5, 7, and 15 feet... at various wide apertures (f/2.8 and f/4).
Peterff wrote:
I've just remembered that I have a picture or two from a couple of years ago of a friend's house just before a gathering. It is a relatively small San Francisco house. Taken with a T3i and the EF-S10-22mm at 10mm 0.8s f/8.0 using a tripod. All natural lighting, which I think meets your indoor / low light description. This is straight out of the camera, I know the windows are blown out etc., but my wife just walked past, saw it and said "Oh! You caught the atmosphere nicely."
So this is nowhere like the earlier examples which are very impressive indeed, but may give you a realistic idea of what the lens would do on your camera.
The second, I realized I had used auto exposure bracketing as I was just beginning to experiment with HDR concepts, so once again a very early attempt, but I have just taken the three exposures and combined them using the DPP HDR tool. So, once again, I'm sure many people could do much, much better but it does show what some very basic quick shots can accomplish with minimal work and even less skill!
Hope it helps.
I've just remembered that I have a picture or two ... (
show quote)