SBW

Which is exactly why you remain so ignorant. Stupid is as stupid does. That is you turd.

Checkmate Loc: Southern California

Typical. You are always blowing smoke out of your backside so much that only a few on the lower end of the sub human scale can follow you.

Checkmate Loc: Southern California

Twardlow is Arkansas's resident r****t. He seems to look for any reason to think that his black race is never in the wrong and tries to blame white people and especially police on dispatching the bad black ones. Per capita the b****s are incarcerated many times that of w****s and b****s k**l b****s many times that of w****s. He still is trying to have Holder try Warren Wilson, the officer in Ferguson, tried, but even that r****t Holder couldn't make anything stick.

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

Only one point worth reposting to--the source. Really, that's a pitiful news source.

BTW, I don't h**e Paul; agree with him on (rare) occasion--drones, for example.

But he doesn't have a chance...well, maybe VP nomination, but not e******n.

Republicans have a really poor crop this e******n.

NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian

Boyfriend coming over?

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

A thinking person Always Questions the content! But you can make the work easier by not even opening sources that have proved their weaknesses in the past.

It's not easy, understanding what's going on, and who's trying to manipulate you (which is Everybody!).

Lossa Work!

SBW

It is amazing how ignorant and stupid you are. On a good day at your best you are probably just a functional i***t. Barely functional. Oh there are lots of people around that are as stupid as you, maybe some even more stupid. But usually they do not continuously open their mouths and confirm it time and time again. You assume because something comes from a certain source it just cannot be true. It does not fit your preconceived view of everything so it cannot be true and it is mostly because of the source of the news. What ignorant fools like you fail to realize is something that is so obvious if it were a snake it would bite you. And that is in the past 15 or so years alternative media and media that was not even in place 15-20 years ago as gained traction. It has gained traction for two primary reasons. One, it was sorely needed as an alternative to the alphabet channels and dominant print media. In other words there was a waiting audience. Second, this alternative media has brought forth information and published facts that before 15-20 years ago would not even has seen the light of day. If this alternative media that you and your ilk h**e so much and are so threatened by were not t***hful they would have been litigated out of business years ago. Some of your ilk that can think and reason (certainly not you) realize that and it scares them to death. I have said it before and I will say it again; a liberal will always tip you off as to what threatens them. If the libs had their way this alternative media that has had such great recent success would be stamped out. It would suit you just fine if only one side were presented. And that makes your kind not only stupid and ignorant but dangerous. You are just a r****t parasite and nothing more.

Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal

By way of preface, we must note that Brietbart is not known for journalistic integrity, as we should all recall the case of Shirley Sherrod. So Brietbart should always be taken with a huge grain of sal.

To the specifics:

1. This was an editorial comment, not a lie, unless the NYT is guilty of expressing an opinion that they do not believe. It is true that the venue for the conventions has a no firearms policy, if the NRA was true to their convictions, they could have chosen another site.

2. Rand Paul has a well known history of acrimonious relations with the press, and especially female journalists and these stories are going to keep coming, unless Paul suddenly grows a thicker skin. Exactly who turned off the lights is really not important. We are not privy to the ground rules for the interview, but politicians on the national stage all have packed media schedules. Rarely doe one just walk off the set.

3. Bloomberg fall for a f**e news scm. Right wing outlets do this all the time. Bloomberg retracted. It seems that that should be the endo of the story, not blown up into an hysterical rant about the t***hfulness of MSM.

Especially by the likes of Brietbart. See introductory comment.

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

You know, your tirades would be much easier to read if you broke them into paragraphs. Think about it.

That said, I must have really touched a sore point, an insecurity perhaps, to have drawn out such a response. After you vomited a bit, you actually got a thought out:

"And that is in the past 15 or so years alternative media and media that was not even in place 15-20 years ago as gained traction. It has gained traction for two primary reasons. One, it was sorely needed as an alternative to the alphabet channels and dominant print media. In other words there was a waiting audience. Second, this alternative media has brought forth information and published facts that before 15-20 years ago would not even has seen the light of day."

This might be so.

How about this for your alternative media:

'I wish there was a RAG I could read and not question the content.'


"A thinking person Always Questions the content! But you can make the work easier by not even opening sources that have proved their weaknesses in the past.

It's not easy, understanding what's going on, and who's trying to manipulate you (which is Everybody!).

Lossa Work!"

I think it stands up.

To get the attention of others, you need to clean up your language a bit, and please stop accusing me of emotions I don't have, but which live within you, and surge to the surface whenever you panic.

You'll go farther for it.

Pepper Loc: Planet Earth Country USA

Oh hell folks we have links and articles posted here continually that are full of half t***hs, misinformation and even some flat out lies. You can find these “rags” in support of either party or as Larry Payne and Toother showed us even sites to promote theories and ideologies. Even so many go right on promoting this stuff like its gospel. Not many read these for their content but rather to grab little bullets to support some BS they’re slinging probably here on the hog. Some of these publications are looking to create sensation some are really trying to get the t***h out there BUT even these folks have their bias. This stuff is kind of like talking to a couple going through a divorce, you get her side and his side both believing they’re telling the t***h. Fact is the t***h most probably lies somewhere in the middle.

SBW

Oh SPAZBO there you go again. Your are a lying bastard. The venue for this year's NRA convention DOES NOT have a no firearms policy. The NYT is lying and they know it. The NYT is lying and YOU know it. There was a reporter from CBS this morning on TV reporting from the NRA convention and she shot this myth down quickly. I did not know CBS had it in them but good for her. I have been to about 15 or so NRA conventions and here is the NRA policy on WORKING firearms at a NRA convention. The NRA requires that attendees follow local, state and federal laws on firearms and concealed carry. It happens that the state of Tennessee has a reciprocal agreement with most states that issue concealed carry licenses. That is it, it is very simple. Something even a simpleton and fool like you SPAZBO could understand.

A few years ago if you attended the convention in Charlotte, NC (I did) you were NOT allowed to carry because the city of Charlotte would not allow carry at that venue. Simple. Again, even a simpleton like you could understand it. As a group NRA members might be the most law abiding people on the planet. But since so many lies are perpetrated by the left wing media and ignorant jerks like you a lot of people might not know it.

This myth of no carry or working firearms at this years' convention is something started by the left wing media and picked up by all of them including the NYT. It is a lie and they know it. The media are also reporting with a good bit of smugness that if a NRA member purchases a weapon at this year's convention then it has to be shipped and picked up at a Federally licensed firearms dealer in their local community or state they live in. Oh gee, what a silly thing that is according to the media. Well that is normal as it is the law. The NRA strictly adheres to all firearms laws and regulation.

You would not know any of this because you are too stupid. So stupid that you take everything as gospel that the left wing media spews out. You are a liar and a parasite prick. Nothing to you. You are a loser SPAZBO. A loser.

I do not know anything about the rest of your post as I stopped at the first lie you told. I would imagine if investigated it would be equally untrue.

Here are a couple of balanced articles about this year's NRA convention in Nashville and the subject of carrying guns.

You are a lying prick and a loser SPAZBO.

http://bearingarms.com/nra-isnt-banning-carry-guns-convention/

http://investmentwatchblog.com/surprise-the-new-york-times-is-blatantly-lying-about-guns-at-the-nra-annual-convention/

user47602 Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32

Mike, correct me if I'm wrong here, but it looks like only the liberal viewpoint actually is mostly adult-like and comments on the actual article, while the conservative viewpoint relies on infantile name-calling to make its points. (ok, mainly SBW, NeilL and Checkmate)

dljen Loc: Central PA

With the exception of Pepper, I disagree with him but never saw him calling names and acting like the ones you name above who are just trolls on this site.

Pepper Loc: Planet Earth Country USA

And of course the liberal faction here on the hog never stoop to name calling,,,,shhhhhh you're bias is showing.

Pepper Loc: Planet Earth Country USA

Why thank you Donna that was most kind of you.