Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Suggestions on long reaching lens, please!
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Feb 26, 2012 16:20:03   #
rjb0765
 
I am currently shooting a Nikon D3100 with a af-s 200 lens. I use paint shop pro 4x and aftershot for processing. My heart is in lanscape and wildlife photos so I find myself really pushing that little 200 mm lens to get me photos its not really meant to get. So i end up trying to blow them up for detail in paint shop and wind up with photo degredation. I can have a crystal clear shot of an eagle feeding as a 5x7 but when i try to make it grow i get noise. oh, by the way I view my pics on my tv, a visio 32 inch hi def. that may be part of the problem too. A 5x7 or 8x10 may always look noisy when it fills a 32 inch screen? I don't know. On the other hand I get some really great shots if conditions are right and i can get closer. Sorry about the blah blah....what I'd like is some advice on a great quality lens in the 500 to 600 mm range with auto focus that will work with my nikon (only because i've read that the manual focus on those is very tough to deal with) and some opinions as to whether i'm causing myself trouble by using my tv as a monitor. thanks to all. There is such a curve to this stuff i can use all the help i can get.

Reply
Feb 26, 2012 17:35:42   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
rjb0765 wrote:
I am currently shooting a Nikon D3100 with a af-s 200 lens. I use paint shop pro 4x and aftershot for processing. My heart is in lanscape and wildlife photos so I find myself really pushing that little 200 mm lens to get me photos its not really meant to get. So i end up trying to blow them up for detail in paint shop and wind up with photo degredation. I can have a crystal clear shot of an eagle feeding as a 5x7 but when i try to make it grow i get noise. oh, by the way I view my pics on my tv, a visio 32 inch hi def. that may be part of the problem too. A 5x7 or 8x10 may always look noisy when it fills a 32 inch screen? I don't know. On the other hand I get some really great shots if conditions are right and i can get closer. Sorry about the blah blah....what I'd like is some advice on a great quality lens in the 500 to 600 mm range with auto focus that will work with my nikon (only because i've read that the manual focus on those is very tough to deal with) and some opinions as to whether i'm causing myself trouble by using my tv as a monitor. thanks to all. There is such a curve to this stuff i can use all the help i can get.
I am currently shooting a Nikon D3100 with a af-s ... (show quote)


I have a D90 and just recently bought a D7000. I had been using the Nikkor 55-300mm for birds and critters, but on some occasions it just didn't reach out far enough. Last week I ordered a Sigma 150-500mm for more distance, it should be delivered tomorrow. Since I don't have it yet, I can't speak on it's quality, but others on this forum have indicated that it is a pretty good lens.

Reply
Feb 26, 2012 17:53:31   #
Wabbit Loc: Arizona Desert
 
rjb0765 wrote:
I am currently shooting a Nikon D3100 with a af-s 200 lens. I use paint shop pro 4x and aftershot for processing. My heart is in lanscape and wildlife photos so I find myself really pushing that little 200 mm lens to get me photos its not really meant to get. So i end up trying to blow them up for detail in paint shop and wind up with photo degredation. I can have a crystal clear shot of an eagle feeding as a 5x7 but when i try to make it grow i get noise. oh, by the way I view my pics on my tv, a visio 32 inch hi def. that may be part of the problem too. A 5x7 or 8x10 may always look noisy when it fills a 32 inch screen? I don't know. On the other hand I get some really great shots if conditions are right and i can get closer. Sorry about the blah blah....what I'd like is some advice on a great quality lens in the 500 to 600 mm range with auto focus that will work with my nikon (only because i've read that the manual focus on those is very tough to deal with) and some opinions as to whether i'm causing myself trouble by using my tv as a monitor. thanks to all. There is such a curve to this stuff i can use all the help i can get.
I am currently shooting a Nikon D3100 with a af-s ... (show quote)


Looks like you want to go long for the wildlife but for landscape you need wide and a tripod

Reply
 
 
Feb 26, 2012 18:40:19   #
PhotoMan1929 Loc: Virginia, USA
 
rjb0765 wrote:
I am currently shooting a Nikon D3100 with a af-s 200 lens. I use paint shop pro 4x and aftershot for processing. My heart is in lanscape and wildlife photos so I find myself really pushing that little 200 mm lens to get me photos its not really meant to get. So i end up trying to blow them up for detail in paint shop and wind up with photo degredation. I can have a crystal clear shot of an eagle feeding as a 5x7 but when i try to make it grow i get noise. oh, by the way I view my pics on my tv, a visio 32 inch hi def. that may be part of the problem too. A 5x7 or 8x10 may always look noisy when it fills a 32 inch screen? I don't know. On the other hand I get some really great shots if conditions are right and i can get closer. Sorry about the blah blah....what I'd like is some advice on a great quality lens in the 500 to 600 mm range with auto focus that will work with my nikon (only because i've read that the manual focus on those is very tough to deal with) and some opinions as to whether i'm causing myself trouble by using my tv as a monitor. thanks to all. There is such a curve to this stuff i can use all the help i can get.
I am currently shooting a Nikon D3100 with a af-s ... (show quote)


Unfortunately, you do not give enough information for anyone to make a definitive recommendation. So I will make an assumption that your working distance will be 200 yards (600 feet). In that case, a Nikon 500 mm lens will give you a field of view of about 19 x 28 feet. If you add a Nikon 2.0 teleconverter, your field of view will be about 9 x 14 feet.

As for landscape lenses, there is a "newbie notion" that only a wide angle lens should be used. It is typical of newcomers that they usually want to include the whole world in their landscape shots. A wide angle lens will make a mountain range look like a row of low hills. There is no one "best" lens for landscape work. It all depends upon the scene and the image the photographer wants.

Reply
Feb 26, 2012 18:48:15   #
Wabbit Loc: Arizona Desert
 
PhotoMan1929 wrote:
rjb0765 wrote:
I am currently shooting a Nikon D3100 with a af-s 200 lens. I use paint shop pro 4x and aftershot for processing. My heart is in lanscape and wildlife photos so I find myself really pushing that little 200 mm lens to get me photos its not really meant to get. So i end up trying to blow them up for detail in paint shop and wind up with photo degredation. I can have a crystal clear shot of an eagle feeding as a 5x7 but when i try to make it grow i get noise. oh, by the way I view my pics on my tv, a visio 32 inch hi def. that may be part of the problem too. A 5x7 or 8x10 may always look noisy when it fills a 32 inch screen? I don't know. On the other hand I get some really great shots if conditions are right and i can get closer. Sorry about the blah blah....what I'd like is some advice on a great quality lens in the 500 to 600 mm range with auto focus that will work with my nikon (only because i've read that the manual focus on those is very tough to deal with) and some opinions as to whether i'm causing myself trouble by using my tv as a monitor. thanks to all. There is such a curve to this stuff i can use all the help i can get.
I am currently shooting a Nikon D3100 with a af-s ... (show quote)


Unfortunately, you do not give enough information for anyone to make a definitive recommendation. So I will make an assumption that your working distance will be 200 yards (600 feet). In that case, a Nikon 500 mm lens will give you a field of view of about 19 x 28 feet. If you add a Nikon 2.0 teleconverter, your field of view will be about 9 x 14 feet.

As for landscape lenses, there is a "newbie notion" that only a wide angle lens should be used. It is typical of newcomers that they usually want to include the whole world in their landscape shots. A wide angle lens will make a mountain range look like a row of low hills. There is no one "best" lens for landscape work. It all depends upon the scene and the image the photographer wants.
quote=rjb0765 I am currently shooting a Nikon D31... (show quote)


I beg to differ, I'm no Newbie, shooting landscape with film since the 60's.

Landscape is generally associated with wide angle glass and tripods if for no other reason than it's deep depth of field, mirror lock up, and slow shutter speed ability on a tripod.

But you can call me a newbie if it makes you happy.

Reply
Feb 26, 2012 23:41:48   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
I just got rid of my Sigma 50-500mm zoom in order to get the Sigma 150-500mm zoom with OS. Its quite sharp and the OS allows me to use it handheld at full zoom. Only had it less than a week but love it already, its at least as sharp as the old one was, maybe more so. Taking it to Yellowstone Park next weekend for a real field test. And the price is right too! $1069, also it will yield a 225-750mm zoom on your crop sensor body.

Reply
Feb 26, 2012 23:43:11   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
Mac wrote:
rjb0765 wrote:
I am currently shooting a Nikon D3100 with a af-s 200 lens. I use paint shop pro 4x and aftershot for processing. My heart is in lanscape and wildlife photos so I find myself really pushing that little 200 mm lens to get me photos its not really meant to get. So i end up trying to blow them up for detail in paint shop and wind up with photo degredation. I can have a crystal clear shot of an eagle feeding as a 5x7 but when i try to make it grow i get noise. oh, by the way I view my pics on my tv, a visio 32 inch hi def. that may be part of the problem too. A 5x7 or 8x10 may always look noisy when it fills a 32 inch screen? I don't know. On the other hand I get some really great shots if conditions are right and i can get closer. Sorry about the blah blah....what I'd like is some advice on a great quality lens in the 500 to 600 mm range with auto focus that will work with my nikon (only because i've read that the manual focus on those is very tough to deal with) and some opinions as to whether i'm causing myself trouble by using my tv as a monitor. thanks to all. There is such a curve to this stuff i can use all the help i can get.
I am currently shooting a Nikon D3100 with a af-s ... (show quote)


I have a D90 and just recently bought a D7000. I had been using the Nikkor 55-300mm for birds and critters, but on some occasions it just didn't reach out far enough. Last week I ordered a Sigma 150-500mm for more distance, it should be delivered tomorrow. Since I don't have it yet, I can't speak on it's quality, but others on this forum have indicated that it is a pretty good lens.
quote=rjb0765 I am currently shooting a Nikon D31... (show quote)


Yes Mac, I got mine, you will love it! Only complaint I have is the location of the OS switch, to easy to turn off accidentally.

Reply
 
 
Feb 27, 2012 00:40:14   #
Mpeter45 Loc: Springfield, Illinois
 
If you want increase file size to facilitate cropping, try Genuine Fractals, a PS plugin. It interpolates files and and make a 6mb file into a 90mb file. Supposed to do a real good job.
Has anyone used this?

Reply
Feb 27, 2012 05:33:25   #
bull drink water Loc: pontiac mi.
 
you could try useing a long lens,photographing a bunch of overlaping photos and stitching them together.

Reply
Feb 27, 2012 06:01:34   #
audpro1988
 
My wife has a Sigma 150-500 on a Nikon D7000 and it is great!!

Reply
Feb 27, 2012 06:10:25   #
dlwhawaii Loc: Sunny Wailuku, Hawaii
 
Genuine Fractals has been incorporated into the OnOne Photo Suite (Perfect Resize 7). I have used this as well as Alien Skin BlowUp and find that with either the larger the initial file size the better the final results.

Reply
 
 
Feb 27, 2012 07:29:27   #
Lupane Loc: Gainsville, Ga.
 
MT Shooter wrote:
I just got rid of my Sigma 50-500mm zoom in order to get the Sigma 150-500mm zoom with OS. Its quite sharp and the OS allows me to use it handheld at full zoom. Only had it less than a week but love it already, its at least as sharp as the old one was, maybe more so. Taking it to Yellowstone Park next weekend for a real field test. And the price is right too! $1069, also it will yield a 225-750mm zoom on your crop sensor body.


The Sigma 150-500mm is an extremely excellent lens, I own one and have been using it often. It is a bit heavy as it should be expected; no complaints here!. It is sharp throughout the zoom range, the pictures will satisfy anyone, my cost was around $900 then and it is a "steal" investment. Buy it, enjoy it, and use it, definitely you will not be disappointed.

Reply
Feb 27, 2012 08:25:48   #
Wabbit Loc: Arizona Desert
 
Lupane wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
I just got rid of my Sigma 50-500mm zoom in order to get the Sigma 150-500mm zoom with OS. Its quite sharp and the OS allows me to use it handheld at full zoom. Only had it less than a week but love it already, its at least as sharp as the old one was, maybe more so. Taking it to Yellowstone Park next weekend for a real field test. And the price is right too! $1069, also it will yield a 225-750mm zoom on your crop sensor body.


The Sigma 150-500mm is an extremely excellent lens, I own one and have been using it often. It is a bit heavy as it should be expected; no complaints here!. It is sharp throughout the zoom range, the pictures will satisfy anyone, my cost was around $900 then and it is a "steal" investment. Buy it, enjoy it, and use it, definitely you will not be disappointed.
quote=MT Shooter I just got rid of my Sigma 50-50... (show quote)


I don't normally buy third party lenses but you guys sure have my attention

Reply
Feb 27, 2012 08:35:19   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
Rabbit wrote:
Lupane wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
I just got rid of my Sigma 50-500mm zoom in order to get the Sigma 150-500mm zoom with OS. Its quite sharp and the OS allows me to use it handheld at full zoom. Only had it less than a week but love it already, its at least as sharp as the old one was, maybe more so. Taking it to Yellowstone Park next weekend for a real field test. And the price is right too! $1069, also it will yield a 225-750mm zoom on your crop sensor body.


The Sigma 150-500mm is an extremely excellent lens, I own one and have been using it often. It is a bit heavy as it should be expected; no complaints here!. It is sharp throughout the zoom range, the pictures will satisfy anyone, my cost was around $900 then and it is a "steal" investment. Buy it, enjoy it, and use it, definitely you will not be disappointed.
quote=MT Shooter I just got rid of my Sigma 50-50... (show quote)


I don't normally buy third party lenses but you guys sure have my attention
quote=Lupane quote=MT Shooter I just got rid of ... (show quote)


Ring (Rabbit),
You can't beat it for the price, I have posted some pics from mine already, will have many more next week.

Reply
Feb 27, 2012 09:02:16   #
thefunxtr Loc: Atlanta
 
MT Shooter wrote:
I just got rid of my Sigma 50-500mm zoom in order to get the Sigma 150-500mm zoom with OS. Its quite sharp and the OS allows me to use it handheld at full zoom. Only had it less than a week but love it already, its at least as sharp as the old one was, maybe more so. Taking it to Yellowstone Park next weekend for a real field test. And the price is right too! $1069, also it will yield a 225-750mm zoom on your crop sensor body.


Hi MT ... have you used it long enough to offer any comments on it's performance handheld at settings below 1/500 @ 500mm?

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.