Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Has anyone discontinued their Adobe CC subscription? Other questions, also
Page <prev 2 of 7 next> last>>
Dec 27, 2014 01:47:08   #
luvmypets Loc: Born & raised Texan living in Fayetteville NC
 
minniev wrote:
I have subscribed since the photographers' package became available (9.99 a month), no problems with payment or downloads. Had one problem with Adobe due to changing email address which was very difficult to solve with Adobe's sketchy tech support, but eventually got it worked out.

If you quit paying/unsubscribe, you will soon be unable to use the applications, as described by others already, as one would expect.

Lightroom and Photoshop are well worth the money, and the monthly payment suits my retiree's budget better than a big lump sum every couple of years. I do have some concern about price increases down the road, but I figure by the time that happens, there may well be other alternatives. On One looks like a good candidate, as they are making their programs more versatile and powerful with every iteration.
I have subscribed since the photographers' package... (show quote)


Thank you for your insights. I really appreciate it.

Reply
Dec 27, 2014 03:42:44   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
luvmypets wrote:
Thank you for the information and insights. I agree Photoshop is a great product and even tho I have never used Lightroom I have seen videos and tutorials that used it and see that it, too, is a great product.

I just can't get past the idea that I am paying for something I will never own and will eventually have paid more in the subscription than I would to buy the program's outright. I will just have to think about it a little longer.


I am not sure if you realize this, but you never "own" the software in either scenario. You purchase a license to use it - but ownership remains with Adobe. You cannot resell it, you cannot transfer it to someone else, if you load it on more than one computer at attempt to run simultaneous sessions you can get "found out" and so on. All you own with a perpetual license is the right to use it in accordance with Adobe's intent. There is little value to owning something that will not be supported. At some point in time I am certain I will have to reload CS6 if I want to still use it, and if something is wrong with the media I would be able to download a working copy from Adobe.

But that is a hypothetical - the reality is that I have no use for CS6. I will never use it. In the event Adobe raises its price on the PS/LR bundle, I will be better serviced by an alternate - perhaps a combination of Photoline, Capture One and DXO - each of which is pretty good and does certain things that are not easily possible in PS/CC. I like the catalog system, but DXO's project system and CaptureOne's browser/catalog are also pretty good - so if I have to start using a different raw converter it won't be the end of the world.

I am not an Adobe Loyalist - I simply use the best software for the task - I waited until PS/CC went to $10/mo -before buying in. It was my primary objection - $120/yr works for me.

If think about it - a corporation buys a custom written application - it pays an initial up front price for development and implementation. Then it pays an ongoing price for maintenance - that constitutes a subscription. Adobe's plan is no different - and it offers the same benefits. It just doesn't come on a DVD.

Reply
Dec 27, 2014 05:03:55   #
blackest Loc: Ireland
 
luvmypets wrote:
Thank you for your input. You have given me more to think about before I commit to this.


It doesn't appear that the Gimp will work as a host program on OSX as the plugin that is required doesn't exist for OSX just Windows and Linux via wine.
I'm still looking for a viable alternative host.

Reply
 
 
Dec 27, 2014 05:43:45   #
sodapop Loc: Bel Air, MD
 
No more updated hard copies of Lightroom I presume? I>E> stuck with LR 5.7 forever if you don't sign up for cc?

Reply
Dec 27, 2014 05:49:38   #
minniev Loc: MIssissippi
 
sodapop wrote:
No more updated hard copies of Lightroom I presume? I>E> stuck with LR 5.7 forever if you don't sign up for cc?


Adobe says Lightroom will continue to be updated and sold independently of CC. There sometimes may be tiny incremental updates that go to the CC version in between. Lots of people are quite content with just Lightroom and don't want or need the rest of the CC package.

Reply
Dec 27, 2014 05:50:01   #
Wallbanger Loc: Madison, WI
 
blackest wrote:
It doesn't appear that the Gimp will work as a host program on OSX as the plugin that is required doesn't exist for OSX just Windows and Linux via wine.
I'm still looking for a viable alternative host.


GIMP has been OSX native since 2012. Just download it from GIMP.org.

Take a look at Pixelmator as well. http://www.pixelmator.com/mac/

Really though, at $10/mo, PS and LR is a great value, you always have the latest version of both apps. If you actually update your software, it works out to about the same or a little less than the outright purchase every year or so for both apps. (Although you can't do that with PS).

Reply
Dec 27, 2014 06:36:13   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
lightcatcher wrote:
It is my understanding no payment program no work. That is why I will not do it.

That's why I'm glad I bought PS when it was still available.

Reply
 
 
Dec 27, 2014 06:37:38   #
blackest Loc: Ireland
 
Wallbanger wrote:
GIMP has been OSX native since 2012. Just download it from GIMP.org.

Take a look at Pixelmator as well. http://www.pixelmator.com/mac/

Really though, at $10/mo, PS and LR is a great value, you always have the latest version of both apps. If you actually update your software, it works out to about the same or a little less than the outright purchase every year or so for both apps. (Although you can't do that with PS).


I think you misunderstood what I was saying, Photoshop often isn't used for much beyond launching other programs. e.g ACR for basic adjustments then back to photoshop to launch say silverfx to process as B&W then back to photoshop to export as a jpeg.

GIMP on windows has had a plugin to call photoshop plugins since 2001 but that plugin doesn't exist for MAC there might be a way to call the standalone version of the plugin suite though. Maybe save as psd open in perfect effects and open again in Gimp for example.

I will take a look at pixelmator. If you read my earlier post $10 a month is only available to US subscribers for users elsewhere its more, for me it's $16 a month and that stinks, other American companies such as onone don't price this way.

If Photoshop is the only game in town then the price is what the price is, if not they may reconsider.

Reply
Dec 27, 2014 06:40:06   #
Davethehiker Loc: South West Pennsylvania
 
Gene51 wrote:


the reality is that I have no use for CS6. I will never use it. In the event Adobe raises its price on the PS/LR bundle, I will be better serviced by an alternate - perhaps a combination of Photoline, Capture One and DXO - each of which is pretty good and does certain things that are not easily possible in PS/CC. I like the catalog system, but DXO's project system and CaptureOne's browser/catalog are also pretty good - so if I have to start using a different raw converter it won't be the end of the world.

I am not an Adobe Loyalist - I simply use the best software for the task - I waited until PS/CC went to $10/mo -before buying in. It was my primary objection - $120/yr works for me.

If think about it - a corporation buys a custom written application - it pays an initial up front price for development and implementation. Then it pays an ongoing price for maintenance - that constitutes a subscription. Adobe's plan is no different - and it offers the same benefits. It just doesn't come on a DVD.
br br the reality is that I have no use for CS6.... (show quote)


You make very convincing and elegant arguments. I get by with an old version of CS5. Granted, I don't know what I'm missing because I have never used PS CC. I'm also a straggler and still use Aperture with Nik filters to store my photos. I'm holding off to see what Apple is going to replace Aperture with in 2015. I would never notice $120 per year. I think I lose that much in the loose change that falls from my pockets and is lost in my couch cushions. :wink:

I hold off for a few reasons:
1) I live out in the boonies where my Internet is slow and intermittent. (Typically 4 Mbps download with occasional bursts to 10 Mbps) Sometimes on weekends it will go out completely and I must wait until Monday when the linemen return to work. If my files are on a CC I'm screwed. I prefer them on a dedicated HD attached with Velcro to the lid of my lap top. I also back EVERYTHING up wirelessly to another bigger HD.

2) I don't like/trust being at the whim of Adobe's will and pricing where they have all my photos.

3) I enjoy the independence of living on a hill top with my own back-up whole house power, natural gas powered generator. When the power grid goes off in storm, as it does a couple times a year, I lose my connection to the Internet but I still have power and can enjoy taking photos and processing them.

Am I missing something? Please point out any errors in my thinking.

I'm also a big fan of DxO and recently piccure+ to process my raw files. I use CS5, Aperture, and Nik filters to manipulate the images. The latest version of DxO does 90% of what needs to be done. I only use PS when I need layers or serious touch up.

Reply
Dec 27, 2014 06:43:34   #
Wallbanger Loc: Madison, WI
 
Davethehiker wrote:
You make very convincing and elegant arguments. I get by with an old version of CS5. Granted, I don't know what I'm missing because I have never used PS CC. I'm also a straggler and still use Aperture with Nik filters to store my photos. I'm holding off to see what Apple is going to replace Aperture with in 2015. I would never notice $120 per year. I think I lose that much in the loose change that falls from my pockets and is lost in my couch cushions. :wink:

I hold off for a few reasons:
1) I live out in the boonies where my Internet is slow and intermittent. (Typically 4 Mbps download with occasional bursts to 10 Mbps) Sometimes on weekends it will go out completely and I must wait until Monday when the linemen return to work. If my files are on a CC I'm screwed. I prefer them on a dedicated HD attached with Velcro to the lid of my lap top. I also back EVERYTHING up wirelessly to another bigger HD.

2) I don't like/trust being at the whim of Adobe's will and pricing where they have all my photos.

3) I enjoy the independence of living on a hill top with my own back-up whole house power, natural gas powered generator. When the power grid goes off in storm, as it does a couple times a year, I lose my connection to the Internet but I still have power and can enjoy taking photos and processing them.

Am I missing something? Please point out any errors in my thinking.

I'm also a big fan of DxO and recently piccure+ to process my raw files. I use CS5, Aperture, and Nik filters to manipulate the images. The latest version of DxO does 90% of what needs to be done. I only use PS when I need layers or serious touch up.
You make very convincing and elegant arguments. I ... (show quote)


Your files ARE NOT stored in the cloud with CC. They reside on your local HD.

Reply
Dec 27, 2014 06:45:57   #
Graeme Loc: El Cerrito, California
 
Pardon a simple question: what happens when one has no Internet connection? E.g. traveling for sometime. What access does one have?

Reply
 
 
Dec 27, 2014 06:47:33   #
Wallbanger Loc: Madison, WI
 
Graeme wrote:
Pardon a simple question: what happens when one has no Internet connection? E.g. traveling for sometime. What access does one have?


http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/faq.html

Reply
Dec 27, 2014 06:50:57   #
Davethehiker Loc: South West Pennsylvania
 
Wallbanger wrote:
Your files ARE NOT stored in the cloud with CC. They reside on your local HD.


Ah, Thank you for clearing up my misconception.:idea:

Now PS CC is looking more attractive to me.

Reply
Dec 27, 2014 06:55:31   #
Wallbanger Loc: Madison, WI
 
Davethehiker wrote:
Ah, Thank you for clearing up my misconception.:idea:

Now PS CC is looking more attractive to me.


The latest version of LR has a great library import tool to migrate from Aperture/iPhoto as well.

Reply
Dec 27, 2014 06:58:47   #
Graeme Loc: El Cerrito, California
 
Wallbanger wrote:
http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/faq.html


Thanks for the quick reply!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.