Gene51 wrote:
Been on the subscription for 18 months - have received numerous updates and 3 version upgrades for PS and 2 (I think) for Lighrroom. It so far has proven to be economical and completely stable. Given the alternative of using 3 yr old software - I have no doubt that I have the right software on my computer.
Just for kicks and giggles - I still have my perpetual licensed CS6 on my computer - and try to use it from time to time. And each time I do, it feels like "old" outdated software - the newer version is slicker and faster and there are certain features, like the ACR filter, local perspective adjustment, blur reduction, focus masking, much much faster content aware and blur effects, and more, that are a complete joy to use and really lessen the time I spend in Photoshop to do the things I typically do to an image.
Discontinue my subscription? Maybe with a gun pointed at my head. But just maybe.
And I am not an Adobe fanboy - I just recognize a great value and excellent software, and I have no "hangups" about subscription-based software especially when it is this good, and the alternatives are 3 yr old software for which support can be withdrawn at any point, or 3rd party applications that don't work as well as PS.
Been on the subscription for 18 months - have rece... (
show quote)
It is a pity Adobe doesn't provide the same value outside the US in Europe you have to pay around $16 a month instead of the $9.99 that Americans pay. Although there is VAT to be paid which Americans don't have to pay it still doesn't account for the difference (at 23% thats still around $12.30). My bank would have no issue with me paying in US dollars and charging me at the current exchange rate but Adobe will not accept the payment without a US address.
The Swiss get it even worse at around $30.43 a month. Adobes answer appears to be we are used to paying more, although all the downloads come from the same US Servers.
Alternatives.
OnOne's perfect Photo suite is also a US product and due to having a UK office they do charge VAT on top of the US price, it is on the US price and not a made up we must charge you more price.
It's not quite photoshop although the modules do work within photoshop. The raw support is very good for my G5 for example it reads the panasonic raw format directly where Photoshop CS6 doesn't. The updates for CS6 finish before they added support in adobe camera raw.
Adobe DNG converter will convert the raw files to a DNG format that CS6 does understand. However it isn't clear if the lens profile information within the RAW file is applied in the conversion.
The Demo of photoshop CC does apply the embedded lens profile automatically, the lens profile is embedded within the raw file. Thats one strong reason for considering photoshop CC.
The question is can you photoshop without photoshop?
Photoshop lets you launch adobe camera raw adjust the raw image before taking it into photoshop and then often you'll use a plugin module to do further refining of the image such as nik or topaz. photoshop itself often is just a launcher for third party modules.
A work flow might be photoshop > ACR > Photoshop > third party modules > photoshop > save.
Photoshop is like a drug dealer giving you access to the goodies you do want.
worth thinking the subscription to photoshop does not give you nik or topaz or perfect photo these have to be bought separately.
So is there an alternative launcher? It seems there might be unfortunately there are several, onOne has its standalone for its modules topaz has its one for its modules nik also has... It might be the gimp which has the best support for a mix of these modules.
The most compelling thing about photoshop is ACR and the way you can integrate third party modules into your work flow. I'm not convinced that Photoshop is an essential component to the work flow that cannot be replaced.