The amazing capabilities of the Canon SX50 !!!!
Sep 11, 2014 21:13:18 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
Who needs to spend thousands of dollars when you can get macros like these photos. Taken by a friend (Cheryl Johnson) with a Canon Powershot SX50 and Raynox DCR-250 snap-on macro lens
Sep 11, 2014 21:32:03 #
Too close to the spider for me. Nice shots I like the detail in the water drop on the fly's eye.
Sep 11, 2014 21:32:59 #
They take nice photos but are out of my price range. I looked at them before I made my decision when I bought my new camera earlier this year.
Sep 11, 2014 21:34:30 #
Sep 11, 2014 21:35:07 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
photo guy wrote:
They take nice photos but are out of my price range. I looked at them before I made my decision when I bought my new camera earlier this year.
Photo guy, you can get the Raynox DCR-250 snap-on macro lens and snap it to one of the cameras you already own.
Sep 11, 2014 21:35:44 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
GrandmaJoy wrote:
Great shots but a bit too buggy . Lol nice work
Good thing they are not 3D ;)
Sep 11, 2014 22:15:30 #
GrandmaJoy
Loc: North Carolina
Racmanaz wrote:
Photo guy, you can get the Raynox DCR-250 snap-on macro lens and snap it to one of the cameras you already own.
The sx40 canons are now selling for approx $250.00
Sep 11, 2014 22:25:59 #
lighthouse
Loc: No Fixed Abode
Racmanaz wrote:
Who needs to spend thousands of dollars when you can get macros like these photos. Taken by a friend (Cheryl Johnson) with a Canon Powershot SX50 and Raynox DCR-250 snap-on macro lens
Very impressive, especially considering that i have been known to call front element macro adapters as a piece of junk.
Thank you for making me reassess my opinion.
Just love the beautiful colour contrast of the last one.
Sep 11, 2014 22:28:57 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
lighthouse wrote:
Very impressive, especially considering that i have been known to call front element macro adapters as a piece of junk.
Thank you for making me reassess my opinion.
Just love the beautiful colour contrast of the last one.
Thank you for making me reassess my opinion.
Just love the beautiful colour contrast of the last one.
Ya I thought the same thing about front lens adapters till I saw her photos.
Sep 11, 2014 23:22:03 #
photo guy wrote:
They take nice photos but are out of my price range. I looked at them before I made my decision when I bought my new camera earlier this year.
Currently the SX50 is under $400 (360 some places) and the Raynox adds about $70-75.
Sep 11, 2014 23:24:12 #
lighthouse wrote:
Very impressive, especially considering that i have been known to call front element macro adapters as a piece of junk.
Thank you for making me reassess my opinion.
Just love the beautiful colour contrast of the last one.
Thank you for making me reassess my opinion.
Just love the beautiful colour contrast of the last one.
Other than the Raynox 150 and 250, that would be correct. Most any of the others are generally not worth the time to put them on!
Sep 11, 2014 23:32:12 #
These are VERY good. Great job!
Did you use a flash or is this natural light? I see reflections in the jumping spider's eyes that remind me of a speedlite with a diffuser.
Did you use a flash or is this natural light? I see reflections in the jumping spider's eyes that remind me of a speedlite with a diffuser.
Sep 12, 2014 06:33:06 #
gym wrote:
These are VERY good. Great job!
Did you use a flash or is this natural light? I see reflections in the jumping spider's eyes that remind me of a speedlite with a diffuser.
Did you use a flash or is this natural light? I see reflections in the jumping spider's eyes that remind me of a speedlite with a diffuser.
I would go all the way to WOW (esp #2) - and it looks like sun in #1 to me - too even on the foreground and background.
Sep 12, 2014 07:41:39 #
Sep 12, 2014 08:52:57 #
Racmanaz wrote:
Who needs to spend thousands of dollars when you can get macros like these photos. Taken by a friend (Cheryl Johnson) with a Canon Powershot SX50 and Raynox DCR-250 snap-on macro lens
Great photos. Quite scary: I'm afraid to look at them on my large monitor :)
Hey, just wondering about the snap on macro lense. I didn't think the SX50 needed a snap on macro since it can focus to 0.0 inches. What did I miss?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.