Police slapped hard for prohibiting photography in public place.
jerryc41 wrote:
woodworker236 wrote:
What was the name of the town in Pa?
New Hope
Thought we had New 'Hope and Change'. That should have taken care of it.
skydiverbob wrote:
WxGuesser wrote:
http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2012/01/eugene_verdict_clarifies_law_p.htmlWhile this case isn't specifically about still photography it is a landmark case upholding the right of citizens to photograph and video (nearly everyone with a cell phone has photo and video capability) police from a public place. While this occurred in Oregon and a Oregon Jury ruled against the police this has national implications because a Federal Court upheld the verdict finding that Mr. Schlossberg's fourth amendment rights had been violated.
What bothers me about this case is the the arrogance of the one cop. In the print copy of this article it said that the other cops realized that they didn't have the right to order the protesters to move on but the cop against whom the lawsuit was aimed still doesn't think he did anything wrong and would do it again.
url
http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-n... (
show quote)
Obviously you weren't around when God gave the police the absolute right to make the rules.
quote=WxGuesser url
http://www.oregonlive.com/pa... (
show quote)
which stone tablet was that on?
docrob wrote:
which stone tablet was that on?
Evidently, the ones that Moses broke on purpose.
I was reading that the U.S. is now toward the top of the list for arresting journalists covering events, and that includes photographers. I cover a lot of protests and am working on getting a press pass, but realistically the police don't care much. I've seen a trend toward more police repression even in non-violent protests.
They may get slapped a few times but it's not stopping them.
Police are definitely becoming more militarized and that's a worrisome trend.
If it looks like it'll be an issue for you, organize a little with other photographers. One can be up close photographing the action directly. Another can be across the street photographing. Another can be down the street a little bit photographing. The police can't justify arresting, detaining or confiscation of all in that case. especially if you have a 4th photographer down the street a block where he can't even photograph the protest, but he can photograph the other photographers being hassled.
Eventually, it could come to photo journalists organizing this way to be able to protect their rights.
docrob wrote:
skydiverbob wrote:
WxGuesser wrote:
http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2012/01/eugene_verdict_clarifies_law_p.htmlWhile this case isn't specifically about still photography it is a landmark case upholding the right of citizens to photograph and video (nearly everyone with a cell phone has photo and video capability) police from a public place. While this occurred in Oregon and a Oregon Jury ruled against the police this has national implications because a Federal Court upheld the verdict finding that Mr. Schlossberg's fourth amendment rights had been violated.
What bothers me about this case is the the arrogance of the one cop. In the print copy of this article it said that the other cops realized that they didn't have the right to order the protesters to move on but the cop against whom the lawsuit was aimed still doesn't think he did anything wrong and would do it again.
url
http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-n... (
show quote)
Obviously you weren't around when God gave the police the absolute right to make the rules.
quote=WxGuesser url
http://www.oregonlive.com/pa... (
show quote)
which stone tablet was that on?
quote=skydiverbob quote=WxGuesser url
http://ww... (
show quote)
The one that got left behind on the mountain.
[quote=WxGuesser]
http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2012/01/eugene_verdict_clarifies_law_p.htmlWhile this case isn't specifically about still photography it is a landmark case upholding the right of citizens to photograph and video (nearly everyone with a cell phone has photo and video capability) police from a public place. While this occurred in Oregon and a Oregon Jury ruled against the police this has national implications because a Federal Court upheld the verdict finding that Mr. Schlossberg's fourth amendment rights had been violated.
You got to know that cops in Oregon are not to be messed with. They have more shooting by cops than just about any other state. I have been on the receiving end of a cop with a bad attitude. I've been thrown down and cuffed for just telling a cop to ease up on a guy he was screaming at. And just about everybody I know that lives in Oregon has been hasseled by cops. Even my daughter has been thrown down, cuffed and detained for no other reason than being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Which is just about anywhere a cop happens to be.
One friend of mine was murdered by a cop in Washington state. It was covered up as usual. Pretty hard to explain why he ended up being shot in the back as he was running away from a hateful cop with a gun. "By the way, my friend, he was Gay"
Sorry for the rant.... I'm just real tired of Martial law attitude in the N.W. especially Oregon. That's why I moved to NY.
[quote=naturalite]
WxGuesser wrote:
http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2012/01/eugene_verdict_clarifies_law_p.htmlWhile this case isn't specifically about still photography it is a landmark case upholding the right of citizens to photograph and video (nearly everyone with a cell phone has photo and video capability) police from a public place. While this occurred in Oregon and a Oregon Jury ruled against the police this has national implications because a Federal Court upheld the verdict finding that Mr. Schlossberg's fourth amendment rights had been violated.
You got to know that cops in Oregon are not to be messed with. They have more shooting by cops than just about any other state. I have been on the receiving end of a cop with a bad attitude. I've been thrown down and cuffed for just telling a cop to ease up on a guy he was screaming at. And just about everybody I know that lives in Oregon has been hasseled by cops. Even my daughter has been thrown down, cuffed and detained for no other reason than being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Which is just about anywhere a cop happens to be.
One friend of mine was murdered by a cop in Washington state. It was covered up as usual. Pretty hard to explain why he ended up being shot in the back as he was running away from a hateful cop with a gun. "By the way, my friend, he was Gay"
Sorry for the rant.... I'm just real tired of Martial law attitude in the N.W. especially Oregon. That's why I moved to NY.
url
http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-n... (
show quote)
It could be worse. How in about the bellybutton of corruption, Illinois? In that state it is illegal to photograph or video any cop under any situation without his permission. So if he is exceeding his authority or beating up on someone it's his word against yours. If the Rodney King situation had occurred in Illinois, the guy who video taped the cops would have spent several years in jail.
Yes, yours was an upsetting exprience happening once in your life. Sorry it happened to you, but I'm glad a member of the general public has had the "safety inspection" experience.
Adding the word "safety" seems to allow cops to do whatever they want. After all, they are acting in the name os "safety."
As a CDL diver "safety and other inspections" are almost everyday events in my, and every CDL drivers life.
We also get to go into rest areas to pee in bottles with a government official watching. Guess that is in the interest of safty too.
We often have a cop (without reason or warrant) tear our trucks apart looking for drugs, or if lucky we can simply allow a drug sniffing dog to run loose in our trucks.
Our trucks must pass state and federal inspections. Still on every nice day we know we will be detained someplace for roadside "safety" inspections.
New scale facilities, we call "super coops", are poping up all over. Super coop areas include scales, mechanical inspection garages, truck impound areas, and jail cells.
Damn, the welfare recipients we support don't even have to take a drug test. Oh, excuse me, I forgot the one welfare woman I knew who was ask to appear for a drug test. Ask, to appear for the appointment scheduled in three weeks.
As Americans, we put up with one hell of lot of governmental bullshit to enjoy our ??? freedom ????
jerryc41 wrote:
This is a no-brainer. Taking someone else's property is called theft. This was a mugging by a public servant.
I'm sure I will never find myself in this situation because I know that might makes right. If a cop decides to rough you up and arrest you and you resist, that is a legitimate offense, and you could suffer the consequences. His arm was twisted, his head hit the pavement, and he spent time in jail. The jury said the cop was wrong. Too little too late. I'm sure the exact same thing will happen again somewhere.
Years ago I was riding my motorcycle through a small town in Pennsylvania with maybe a dozen others. I had a very quiet Honda, so noise was not an issue. There was a large sign in the middle of town directing all motorcycles to pull into a side road for a "safety check." I did as I was told and showed my license and registration. They didn't seem to care if I had insurance or not. Then I was sent on my way.
This was a very minor event in my life - no pain involved, but it has stuck with me. I get mad every time I think about it.
quote=WxGuesser url
http://www.oregonlive.com/pa... (
show quote)
les_stockton wrote:
Generally speaking, I have respect for law enforcement. It goes with having respect for the law. I have a few friends that are officers, in fact.
However, the people that I know that went to the same high school that I attended, were the bullies. They were people that never did much in class (just showed up), and likely couldn't get a job doing much else.
So I think there is a percentage (not sure how much) of law enforcement that have always been a bit on the bully side of things.
Right or wrong, they have the badge and the gun and even though they work for us, they don't always care.
A person has to stand up for their rights where they can, and at least let the officer know that he is in violation. if they choose to ignore and do it anyway, that's what the courts are for.
Generally speaking, I have respect for law enforce... (
show quote)
Funny how you say that. I don't know about anywhere else, but over here, a lot of people don't know their rights. We used to have neighbors complaining about our boats (even though they were parked on private property), TV being too loud (at 8:30), etc. These neighbors would call 911 for trivial matters, so the cops would have to come. They would just step on our property, walk into our garage, etc. My husband would tell them to get off our property and they were not invited in (in a not very quiet way).
The neighbors stopped calling since we bought the property, but the last time the cops came (we were watching "It's a Wonderful Life" too loud for the neighbors at 9:00 p.m.), they were outside with their flashlights. I asked if I could help them and they asked for permission to step on our property. I laughed in my head and told them "no." I met them on the sidewalk.
I know of a few kids as well that went into law enforcement. The ones that disrupted the class or just never showed up. I'm sure there are those that really want to protect citizens, but the basic mentality...
Someone once proposed this question to my husband, "If you want to be a professional criminal, what would you be?"
I am not sure what kind of people some of you hang out with, but my experience & people I know have had just the opposite experience with police. Sure, 10% of any group of people will be the trouble makers and get all the headlines, but most are just just trying to do a job and go home to their families each night.
As far as taking photos of police in action, if your in a public location you should be free to do so. One exception is if your using video with sound, while the video part is no different some states (like Washington) have laws against recording speech without the person's permission. Turn your mikes off if your in such a state. Your equipment could be confiscated as evidence. Also, the five second video you see on the news might show something completely different if the complete 20 minutes of video in context was viewed.
And if your around a disruptive demonstration, why would you be surprised at being swept up with everyone else? You should know when it's time to just leave.
On the subject of shooting photos in a public place....does anyone know if it is true that you have to purchase an expensive permit in order to shoot photos in Times Square in NYC these days?
Thanks ..that's on the other side of the state from me.
wingincamera wrote:
....Also, the five second video you see on the news might show something completely different if the complete 20 minutes of video in context was viewed.
That's why I say that TV news, whether on the left or on the right, cannot possibly do justice to any story.
WxGuesser wrote:
http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2012/01/eugene_verdict_clarifies_law_p.htmlWhile this case isn't specifically about still photography it is a landmark case upholding the right of citizens to photograph and video (nearly everyone with a cell phone has photo and video capability) police from a public place. While this occurred in Oregon and a Oregon Jury ruled against the police this has national implications because a Federal Court upheld the verdict finding that Mr. Schlossberg's fourth amendment rights had been violated.
What bothers me about this case is the the arrogance of the one cop. In the print copy of this article it said that the other cops realized that they didn't have the right to order the protesters to move on but the cop against whom the lawsuit was aimed still doesn't think he did anything wrong and would do it again.
url
http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-n... (
show quote)
I have read most of this thread. It is a topic that has been discussed ofton before. However, let me put a different twist to this. I recently was in Washington DC on official business. On a particular morning I had a meeting on Capitol Hill with my congressman. I was in my class A uniform for my fire company. My hotel was in Arlington so I road the meto to the hill. Many people smiled, waved, a nod of the head or other pleasing non-verbal signs. This also included other uniformed folk military, cops, and civilian uniforms (suits). Later that day, I was in my cives, other than my haircut, I was just another guy. It was very interesting experience. Some of my Brother and sisters in uniform here might be able to tell you of simular expirences
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.