Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Best Backup Software?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Aug 8, 2014 12:46:11   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
Gudehus wrote:
What is the best software?
Carbon Copy Cloner
Why what?
1. Why do a backup?
Bad things can happen.
2. Why is Carbon Copy Cloner the best software/
a. Because you are creating a clone. Everything from your drive
is there, so you can boot off of it, take the clone to another
location, etc. Also a clone will be the same size as what you are
cloning; with Time Machine you can fill up your backup drive
without realizing it until it is too late.
b. Because you can make a clone any time you wish, or
schedule it for one of more times per time interval
c. It's free.
What is the best software? br Carbon Copy Cloner... (show quote)


Gee, you clone everyday as your backup procedure. That would take hours on my PC.

You are a better more patient person than I.

I think I will look at some of the more incremental approaches.

Reply
Aug 8, 2014 12:48:07   #
MikeMcC Loc: Glasgow, Scotland
 
I have used Karens Replicator www.karenware.com for many years. It is free and you can specify source and target locations and schedule it whenever you want. Plain copies are made, so retrieval is easy. Only new or changed files are copied. Every so often I do a full backup to another location - just in case.

Reply
Aug 8, 2014 12:50:58   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
MikeMcC wrote:
I have used Karens Replicator www.karenware.com for many years. It is free and you can specify source and target locations and schedule it whenever you want. Plain copies are made, so retrieval is easy. Only new or changed files are copied. Every so often I do a full backup to another location - just in case.


Thanks

Reply
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Aug 8, 2014 13:03:53   #
Rusty_Stumps Loc: Central Indiana
 
I use NovaStor Backup on my workstation for it's backup's and also the satellite drives, USB and secondary drives in that box.

I also have a web-server with SQL server running for my business so I have Paragon Drive Backup that automatically runs daily for the drives on that unit and a separate package to do the SQL backup. These are then all copied daily to a portable drive that is swapped out once a week and stored in a safe deposit box at the bank.

Better safe than sorry!

Reply
Aug 8, 2014 13:14:29   #
Gudehus Loc: Oregon and California
 
When Carbon Copy Cloner creates a new clone, it looks at what it has written for its previous clone. If nothing new was created on your main drive, then it doesn't have to write anything to the clone drive. Things go really fast, especially it all your drives are SSD.

Reply
Aug 8, 2014 13:19:57   #
proteus1 Loc: NEVADA
 
dsmeltz wrote:
Often I see backup software discussed, but usually as a part of a thread on backing up generally or a discussion of hard drives and/or cloud backup.

What I want to find is the best (most functional balanced with ease of use) backup software for photography. It should do automated incremental backups and (possibly) maintain some level of historical versions, unless there is a consensus that it is not necessary (I would think if you do a lot of RAW work version backup is not as big a deal.)

The discussion can (and should) include the pros and cons of doing photographic backup as part of the overall backup approach vs. having a separate approach specifically for photography related files.

Any thoughts?
Often I see backup software discussed, but usually... (show quote)


There are only two types of backups - - ->

Those that are lost - - ->

and


Those that will be lost...

Pick a GOOD system and stick with it......

Reply
Aug 8, 2014 13:31:29   #
proteus1 Loc: NEVADA
 
dsmeltz wrote:
Often I see backup software discussed, but usually as a part of a thread on backing up generally or a discussion of hard drives and/or cloud backup.

What I want to find is the best (most functional balanced with ease of use) backup software for photography. It should do automated incremental backups and (possibly) maintain some level of historical versions, unless there is a consensus that it is not necessary (I would think if you do a lot of RAW work version backup is not as big a deal.)

The discussion can (and should) include the pros and cons of doing photographic backup as part of the overall backup approach vs. having a separate approach specifically for photography related files.

Any thoughts?
Often I see backup software discussed, but usually... (show quote)


Your gear. . . .


t3i
Sigma 18-35 1.8
Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM
Canon 50mm 1.4
Canon 70-300

You have spent good money on good photo equipment,
Now spend some more on a Good backup system...
Just how much are your photos worth ? ? ?

I have a 16TB Western Digital wi-fi backup system running Windows storage server 2008 R2, I spent $1600.00 on this system, I do not want to take the chance of losing any of my data and/or photos.

Reply
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Aug 8, 2014 13:34:17   #
Gudehus Loc: Oregon and California
 
Here are some other thoughts.
1. People who write backup software do not really concern themselves with whether the files are for photography, geology, astrophysics, etc. You shouldn't concern yourself either.
2. If you blindly run an automatic backup program, and your main drive somehow becomes corrupted or, someone has accidentally deleted files, then the backup program will back up the corrupted or incomplete collection of files. Therefore create several clones of your main drives, and keep some of them in a secure place. Remember: if you have only one backup, and something goes wrong with either the main drive(s) or the backup, then you have NO BACKUP.

Reply
Aug 8, 2014 13:42:59   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
Gudehus wrote:
Here are some other thoughts.
1. People who write backup software do not really concern themselves with whether the files are for photography, geology, astrophysics, etc. You shouldn't concern yourself either.
2. If you blindly run an automatic backup program, and your main drive somehow becomes corrupted or, someone has accidentally deleted files, then the backup program will back up the corrupted or incomplete collection of files. Therefore create several clones of your main drives, and keep some of them in a secure place. Remember: if you have only one backup, and something goes wrong with either the main drive(s) or the backup, then you have NO BACKUP.
Here are some other thoughts. br 1. People who wr... (show quote)


OK..... Soooooo what software do you use to avoid that?

Reply
Aug 8, 2014 13:44:19   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
proteus1 wrote:
Your gear. . . .


t3i
Sigma 18-35 1.8
Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM
Canon 50mm 1.4
Canon 70-300

You have spent good money on good photo equipment,
Now spend some more on a Good backup system...
Just how much are your photos worth ? ? ?

I have a 16TB Western Digital wi-fi backup system running Windows storage server 2008 R2, I spent $1600.00 on this system, I do not want to take the chance of losing any of my data and/or photos.


And what software do you use to move the files to the server?

Reply
Aug 8, 2014 13:45:43   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
proteus1 wrote:
There are only two types of backups - - ->

Those that are lost - - ->

and


Those that will be lost...

Pick a GOOD system and stick with it......


Lots of great threads regarding the systems. Not so many regarding the software part.


What software do you think should be part of a "GOOD system" and why?

Reply
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Aug 8, 2014 15:25:14   #
aammatj Loc: Zebulon, NC / Roscoe, Ill
 
dsmeltz wrote:
Often I see backup software discussed, but usually as a part of a thread on backing up generally or a discussion of hard drives and/or cloud backup.

What I want to find is the best (most functional balanced with ease of use) backup software for photography. It should do automated incremental backups and (possibly) maintain some level of historical versions, unless there is a consensus that it is not necessary (I would think if you do a lot of RAW work version backup is not as big a deal.)

The discussion can (and should) include the pros and cons of doing photographic backup as part of the overall backup approach vs. having a separate approach specifically for photography related files.

Any thoughts?
Often I see backup software discussed, but usually... (show quote)


I've used FBackup4 for a few years and love it. It is free and easy to setup.

Reply
Aug 8, 2014 22:07:48   #
cwhonda Loc: SLC, UT.
 
I read through the replies and found something that was not mentioned. Everyone talks about hard drives but nobody talked about solid state drives while much more expensive they are also many times more reliable than mechanical drives. Again as I am finding out more money LOL

Reply
Aug 8, 2014 22:45:45   #
Gudehus Loc: Oregon and California
 
I mentioned SSDs today, Aug 8, 2014 at 13:14:29

Reply
Aug 8, 2014 22:58:50   #
cwhonda Loc: SLC, UT.
 
Gudehus, OOPS sorry!!!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.